What is Marquis Hope Village's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Marquis Hope Village 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Marquis Hope Village get at its last inspection?

5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 23, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.

Has Marquis Hope Village been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Marquis Hope Village accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Marquis Hope Village?

CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Companies. Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC.

Marquis Hope Village: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 23, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since November 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.85 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.66 of those hours.

48.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).

CMS links it to Marquis Companies, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

011/22

812/23

104/25

505/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

11D

Potential for minimal harm

May 23, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations

E

Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.

F730 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 3 of 3 sampled CNA staff (#s 7, 8 and 9) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff wore appropriate hair restraints during meal preparation and tray line for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for unsanitary foods and food-borne illness.
D

Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to identify, in a timely manner, a resident who experienced a significant change in status for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injuries and unidentified care needs.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were in to prevent falls for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injuries.
D

Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.

F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#19) reviewed for activities of daily living. This placed residents at risk for lack of dental care needs.

April 10, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for residents with diabetic wounds for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for facility acquired infections.

December 29, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations

E

Post nurse staffing information every day.

F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were accurate for 9 of 30 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for incorrect staffing information.
D

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident for safe self-administration of medication for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration.
D

Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received Advance Beneficiary Notification (ABN) information for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for financial hardship.
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement bowel care and follow physician orders timely for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 20 and 21) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and constipation.
D

Provide appropriate foot care.

F687 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for foot care. This placed residents at risk for lack of nail care and increased infections.
D

Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.

F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dialysis treatment and care was in place including physician orders and communication with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for dialysis complications.
D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#240) reviewed for medication administration. The facility's medication error rate was 8%. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences.
D

Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.

F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 2 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 11 and 13) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality care.

November 17, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

16 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 23, 2025, 10 on December 29, 2023, 4 on November 17, 2022.

Every fire safety citation16 citations

F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · May 23, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · May 23, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.

E 13 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.

E 18 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.

K 355 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Meet other general requirements.

K 932 · December 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · November 17, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · November 17, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · November 17, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.

K 325 · November 17, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Oregon	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	4.85	5.03	3.86
Registered nurses	0.66	0.72	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.45	4.51	3.42
Nurse aides	3.18
Licensed practical nurses	1.01
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	48.4%	47.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	50.0%	51.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 3.44 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.01 on weekdays and 4.45 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.99 in April to June 2025 to 4.85 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	4.85	0.66	5.01	4.45	1.9%	0 of 90	42
Oct to Dec 2025	4.91	0.56	5.06	4.55	4.0%	3 of 92	40
Jul to Sep 2025	5.07	0.84	5.30	4.48	10.1%	1 of 92	39
Apr to Jun 2025	4.99	0.91	5.19	4.48	6.9%	0 of 91	40
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026	4.91	0.64	5.12	4.40	6.2%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Oregon	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	20.8	14.9	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.3	1.4	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.8	2.0	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.7	2.4	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.2	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	17.8	20.6	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	6.2	5.8	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.5	13.9	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	21.0	21.4	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	9.0	16.1	12.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC. CMS links this home to Marquis Companies, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Marquis Companies I, Inc	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	03/01/1998
Fogg, Phillip	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Individual	03/01/1998
Bucher, Amy	W-2 managing employee	Individual	12/01/2007
Fogg, Steven	W-2 managing employee	Individual	10/16/2001
Tone, Staci	W-2 managing employee	Individual	03/01/1998
Fogg, Phillip	Corporate director	Individual	03/01/1998
Fogg, Steven	Corporate director	Individual	10/16/2001
Fogg, Phillip	Corporate officer	Individual	03/01/1998
Fogg, Steven	Corporate officer	Individual	10/16/2001
Bucher, Amy	Operational/managerial control	Individual	12/01/2007

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 29, 2023: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.45 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab
Wilsonville, 5.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Rose Linn Care Center
West Linn, 7.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
Marquis Oregon City Post Acute Rehab
Oregon City, 7.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Rivercrest Post Acute
Oregon City, 7.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 35 citations
Woodside Post Acute
Molalla, 8.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 28 citations
Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City
Oregon City, 8.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 61 citations
Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab
Tualatin, 9.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas
Gladstone, 10.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations

Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Marquis Hope Village's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Marquis Hope Village 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Marquis Hope Village get at its last inspection?: 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 23, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
Has Marquis Hope Village been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Marquis Hope Village accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Marquis Hope Village?: CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Companies. Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.