1680 Molalla Avenue, Oregon City, OR 97045 · Clackamas County · (503) 655-2588
102 certified beds, about 50 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385221 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since August 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.05 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
24.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Marquis Companies, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of water-borne pathogens. This placed residents at risk for exposure to water-borne pathogens.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident accessible outside space was free from environmental hazards for 1 of 1 memory care outdoor area reviewed for safety and failed to safely transfer 1 of 1 sampled resident (#44) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for injury and elopement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a clean, home-like environment for 1 of 1 memory care units and 1 of 1 dining halls observed. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility had a medication error rate of greater than 5%. The facility's error rate was 18% with six errors in 33 opportunities. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medication dosage and adverse consequences related to medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication storage was free of expired biologicals for 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for diminished treatment efficacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and mental abuse by a resident for 1 of 1 resident (# 32) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS was coded accurately related to the use of hearing devices for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for hearing. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff assisted a resident with wearing hearing aids for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for hearing. This placed residents at risk for a decline in communication.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency within 24 hours for 1 of 8 sampled residents (#3) for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely investigations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise and update a care plan related to a skin impairment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#34) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of repeated refusals of thyroid medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow-up on pharmacist recommendations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects.
18 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 27, 2026, 12 on October 24, 2024, 3 on August 30, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.05 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.54 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.45 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.02 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 24.7% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 25.0% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.25 on weekdays and 4.54 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.43 in April to June 2025 to 5.05 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.05 | 0.58 | 5.25 | 4.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 50 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.38 | 0.66 | 5.60 | 4.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.18 | 0.52 | 5.38 | 4.70 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 52 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.43 | 0.66 | 5.63 | 4.92 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 51 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.7 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.1 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.3 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.6 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.0 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Marquis Oregon City Post Acute Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (70.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
70.0% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oregon: 52 better, 3 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 166 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oregon: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 151 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oregon: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 101 eligible stays.
66.3% this home
Median of homes: Oregon59.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.
1.0% this home
Median of homes: Oregon0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 98 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Oregon2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 98 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Oregon98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES II INC. CMS links this home to Marquis Companies, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquis Companies I, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2013 |
| Fogg, Phillip | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 06/22/2012 |
| Bucher, Amy | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Levee, Kathleen | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Tone, Staci | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Fogg, Phillip | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/22/2012 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/22/2012 | |
| Marquis Companies I, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Bucher, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Levee, Kathleen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Olum, April | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Tone, Staci | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.