Woodside Post Acute
301 Ridings Avenue, Molalla, OR 97038 · Clackamas County · (503) 829-5591
92 certified beds, about 78 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1981
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
1 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385150 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 9, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since October 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 5 fines totaling $115,888 in the last three years; the largest was $55,607, and the latest is dated March 18, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.72 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
57.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
710/22
1101/24
111/24
102/25
205/25
107/25
303/26
206/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
3J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
7E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
June 17, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 4 sampled residents (# 7) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical abuse.
- C Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were readily accessible to residents and visitors for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for survey postings. This placed residents and visitors at risk for not having access to the most recent survey results.
March 18, 2026Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate allegations of sexual abuse for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 102, 103, and 108) reviewed for allegations of sexual abuse. This placed all residents at risk for sexual abuse and constituted substandard quality of care. A determination was made that the facility's noncompliance placed Residents 102, 103, and 108 in immediate jeopardy, beginning on 3/17/26. On 3/17/26 at 2:12 PM, Staff 14, Staff 15 (Regional Directors of Clinical Service), and Staff 2 (DNS) were notified of the immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation and provided a copy of the IJ template related to the facility's failure to investigate allegations of sexual abuse.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were followed for transfers for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#107) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for injury and falls.
- D Provide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure rehabilitative services were provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#107) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for a decline in range of motion.
July 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to timely administer CPR for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for CPR. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in Resident 1 receiving emergency CPR 13 to 20 minutes after Resident 1 was found unresponsive. This placed all residents at risk for not receiving timely CPR and constituted substandard quality of care.
May 9, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for screening potential employees to prevent abuse for 3 of 3 sampled new employees (#s 16, 17, and 18) reviewed for employee screening. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician of blood sugar measurements outside of parameters for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for diabetic complications.
February 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
November 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was safe from elopement for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for elopement. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in Resident 9 leaving the facility without appropriate supervision and placed the resident at risk for serious injury or death.
January 17, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for 3 of 3 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an uncomfortable and unhomelike environment.
- E Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess 5 of 9 sampled residents (#s 2, 5, 11, 13 and 21) reviewed for medications and ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely assessment care needs.
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents attained or maintained their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for 6 of 7 sampled residents (#s 3, 15, 30, 33, 88 and 237) and 2 of 3 halls reviewed for call light wait times and staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed ADL care needs.
- E Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 4 of 5 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 5, 6, 7 and 8) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of care.
- E Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 4 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 5, 6, 7, and 8) reviewed for in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for being treated in a dishonorable manner.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate ADL assistance for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for activities of daily living. This placed residents at risk for lack of nutritional intake, grooming and hygiene.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement physician orders timely for bowel care for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 11, 13 and 88) reviewed for ADLs and pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for medical complications from ongoing diarrhea.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility to provide appropriate bowel incontinence care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#237) reviewed for incontinence care. This placed residents at risk for skin breakdown and lack of dignity.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were honored for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 5 and 12) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for food preferences not being honored.
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor the use and storage of food in resident personal refrigerators for 1 of 9 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for activities of daily living. This placed residents at risk cross-contamination and food-borne illness.
October 21, 2022Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prepare, serve, and handle food in a sanitary manner in 1 of 1 kitchen. This placed residents at risk for food borne illness.
- E Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 2 of 3 sampled CNA staff (#s 26 and 27) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide timely care conferences to ensure the resident or resident representative had an opportunity to participate in the review or revision of her/his care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#10) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents at risk for a lack of a person-centered care plan.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Staff 4 (Former Staff/LPN) adhered to professional standards related to a change of condition and documentation. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, increased pain and worsening conditions.
- D Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary was thoroughly completed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#193) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for a lack of coordinated care needs.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a communication device was implemented for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for a decrease in communication and quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address a change of condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#143) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and worsening conditions.
Fire safety inspections
16 fire safety citations on file: 4 on June 10, 2025, 2 on May 9, 2025, 1 on May 9, 2024, 6 on January 17, 2024, 3 on October 21, 2022.
Every fire safety citation16 citations
- L Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Create arrangements with other facilities to receive patients.
- F Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- L Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 18, 2026 | Fine | $55,607 |
| July 24, 2025 | Fine | $16,985 |
| June 10, 2025 | Fine | $15,961 |
| November 14, 2024 | Fine | $5,294 |
| January 10, 2024 | Fine | $22,041 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.72 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.34 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.47 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.6% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 87.5% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.28 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.87 on weekdays and 4.34 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.46 in April to June 2025 to 4.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.72 | 0.38 | 4.87 | 4.34 | 14.8% | 0 of 90 | 78 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.21 | 0.37 | 5.37 | 4.81 | 23.3% | 1 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.25 | 0.38 | 5.45 | 4.74 | 38.8% | 1 of 92 | 65 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.46 | 0.37 | 5.66 | 4.94 | 34.5% | 1 of 91 | 60 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.4 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.7 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: WOODSIDE SNF HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence Group Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2013 |
| Truist Bank | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Collins, Amanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/10/2024 | |
| May, Luke | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/10/2024 | |
| Morris, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Molalla 301 Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| Providence Administrative Consulting Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| May, Luke | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2025 | |
| Morris, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on March 18, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 17, 2024: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
- How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 17, 2024: "Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 17, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.34 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Marquis Hope Village Canby, 8.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Mt Angel Health and Rehabilitation Mount Angel, 11.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Marquis Oregon City Post Acute Rehab Oregon City, 12.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Rivercrest Post Acute Oregon City, 13 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab Wilsonville, 13.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City Oregon City, 14.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- French Prairie Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Woodburn, 14.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 62 citations
- Rose Linn Care Center West Linn, 14.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Woodside Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Woodside Post Acute 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Woodside Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 9, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Woodside Post Acute been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 5 fines totaling $115,888 in the last three years.
- Does Woodside Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Woodside Post Acute?
- CMS lists 12 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: WOODSIDE SNF HEALTHCARE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.