Find a nursing home

Home / Michigan / Sterling

Medilodge of Sterling

500 School Road, Sterling, MI 48659 · Arenac County · (989) 654-2496

39 certified beds, about 37 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1981

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235416 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 5, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).

None of its 19 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.66 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.39 of those hours.

25.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).

CMS links it to Medilodge, an affiliated group of 53 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
2E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
September 5, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of 1 resident (Resident #46) during 3 transfer's using a mechanical lift (wrong sling size used, it was too large) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for mechanical (Hoyer) lift, resulting in the residents lower back and bottom hanging out of the large opening on the backside of the sling, verbalizing of discomfort and fear while being transferred. Findings Included:Resident #46:Review of the Face Sheet, Material Data Set/MDS dated 9/25, care plans dated 9/1/25, and admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #46 was [AGE] years old, alert, admitted to the facility on [DATE], incontinent of bowel and bladder with a Foley urinary catheter in place, totally dependent on staff for his Activities of Daily Living/ADL's, and was mechanical lift for all transfers. [...]
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity by 1) not ensuring a dignity bag was covering 1 resident's (Resident #46) urinary catheter bag, and 2) acknowledge 1 resident (Resident #19) when yelling for help for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings Include: Resident #46: Review of the Face Sheet, Material Data Set/MDS dated 9/25, care plans dated 9/1/25, and admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #46 was [AGE] years old, alert, admitted to the facility on [DATE], incontinent of bowel and bladder with a urinary catheter (Foley) in place, totally dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living/ADL's, and required a mechanical lift for all transfers. [...]
  3. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use and administration of insulin with an insulin pen per manufacturer recommendations and professional standards of practice for one (#35) of two residents reviewed for insulin administration.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize procedures to ensure follow-up assessment and monitoring of abnormal laboratory testing results of medications with for one (#19) of five residents reviewed.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions/EBP were used, and handwashing was done after glove removal for 1 resident (Resident #46) of 13 resident's reviewed for handwashing and proper personal protective equipment usage, resulting in the protentional for cross contamination, resident and staff illness and increased antibiotic use. Findings Include: Resident #46:Review of the Face Sheet, Material Data Set/MDS dated 9/25, care plans dated 9/1/25, and admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #46 was [AGE] years old, alert, admitted to the facility on [DATE], incontinent of bowel and bladder with a Foley urinary catheter in place, totally dependent on staff for his Activities of Daily Living/ADL's, and was mechanical lift for all transfers. [...]
  6. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted in a clear and prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for all 39 facility residents.
August 21, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Properly label and date food and food products, 2. Dispose of expired food and food products, 3. Thoroughly dry dishes prior to stacking, and 4. Ensure air gap for ice machine drainage pipe, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination and foodborne illness. These deficient practices have the potential to affect 37 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings Include: During a tour of the facility kitchen on 8/19/24, beginning at 9:04 AM, the following items were noted: - Kitchen Aid stand mixer was uncovered and not in use. When the mixer was tilted back, chunks of dried food substances were observed. - The floor appeared dirty with a build up of unknown substances and dirt behind the tables, oven, and near the walls. [...]
  2. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program encompassing outcome and process surveillance, resulting in a lack of accurate and comprehensive infection control tracking including potential infections, surveillance and data monitoring/analysis, appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use, lack of implementation of water management sample recommendations, contamination of linens, and the likelihood for spread of microorganisms and illness to all 37 facility residents.
  3. E
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable and appealing food per preference for one resident (Resident # 35) of two residents reviewed and seven of seven confidential group Residents resulting in feelings of frustration and verbalization of discontentment.
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately record and obtain code status (level of medical interventions that an individual wishes to have enacted in a medical emergency situation) documentation for two residents ( Resident #29 and Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for Advance Directives (legal documentation enabling an individual to specify end-of-life care decisions), resulting in lack of accurate assessment and documentation of code status and the potential for a Resident to receive life sustaining medical treatment against their wishes.
  5. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure prompt attending physician's review of pharmacy recommendations and documentation of rationale for lack of action related to pharmacy medication irregularity recommendation reports for one resident (Resident #11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in Resident #11 receiving double the recommended medication dosage, the potential for Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR), and additional medication errors despite pharmacy oversight.
  6. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate medication administration and storage of insulin for one resident (Resident #139) and two inhalers for one resident (Resident #23), resulting in the likelihood of decreased medication efficacy and side effects such as mouth discomfort and/or mouth infection.
August 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    F622 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake Numbers MI00141220 and MI00141312. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to return to the facility following the hospitalization of one resident (Resident #702) of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge, resulting in Resident #702 being transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment related to mental health, and not being allowed to return to the facility without an alternative placement arrangement, necessitating them to stay in the Emergency Department for six days.
September 22, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean ice machine, a proper functioning dish machine, a clean process for clean drying dish racks and a clean fan in the main kitchen, resulting in cross contamination of clean dishes and dish racks, a leaking dish machine with the likelihood of dirty dust particles likely to contaminate clean dishes on the dying rack and the likelihood of cross contamination for all residents using dishes in the facility.
  2. D
    Meet the legal definition of a skilled nursing facility or nursing facility.
    F540 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 18, 2023
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and follow up on Pacemaker checks and a Pacemaker machine for one resident (Resident #3), resulting in no follow up for 17 months, no documented assessment of Pacemaker function, no Pacemaker machine found with the likelihood of Pacemaker complications going unnoticed.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure ongoing assessment, accurate documentation, and care coordination of pressure ulcer (wounds caused by pressure) wound care for one resident (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed resulting in inaccurate documentation, insufficient facility knowledge of pressure ulcer status, lack of wound status and assessment documentation from external wound care provider and the potential for inappropriate and/or delayed care/treatment, wound progression, and decline in overall health status.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to institute and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure comprehensive Range of Motion (ROM) monitoring, documentation, and implementation of a restorative nursing program for one resident (Resident # 1) of two residents,, resulting in a lack of restorative nursing services to maintain and/or prevent further decline in ROM, lack of quantitative assessment and documentation of ROM limitation, and the likelihood for increased ROM limitations, pain, and decline in independence and quality of life.
  6. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a gait belt and walker during a toilet transfer for one resident (Resident #3), resulting in the care plan not being followed and an unsafe transfer.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 5 on August 21, 2024, 2 on September 22, 2023.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. F
    Create arrangements with other facilities to receive patients.
    E 25 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
    K 232 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · September 22, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 22, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.663.993.86
Registered nurses1.390.780.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.693.503.42
Nurse aides2.59
Licensed practical nurses0.69
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)25.6%44.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover22.2%39.2%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.06 on weekdays and 3.69 on weekends, 27% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.31 in April to June 2025 to 4.66 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.661.395.063.69 0.0%0 of 9037
Oct to Dec 20254.601.174.933.76 0.0%0 of 9237
Jul to Sep 20254.371.074.623.73 0.0%0 of 9238
Apr to Jun 20254.310.974.533.75 0.0%0 of 9138
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Michigan, Jan to Mar 20263.950.704.143.453.3%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Michigan

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Michigan, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$19.03$18.35 to $21.5943,290
LPNs and LVNs$31.47$29.83 to $35.5210,880
Registered nurses$45.34$39.46 to $49.74104,950
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.310.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.60.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.93.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.21.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.812.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.45.14.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.514.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.224.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.111.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Medilodge of Sterling's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

50.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

64.0% this home

Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: STERLING OPCO, LLC. CMS links this home to Medilodge, a group of 53 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Fifteeninone Opco Group LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/24/2013
B&y Healthcare S Corp5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization06/24/2013
B&y Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization06/24/2013
Cody Healthcare S Corp5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization06/24/2013
Craig Flashner 2007 Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization06/24/2013
Norcross, RobertContracted managing employeeIndividual06/24/2013
Kirk, KristineW-2 managing employeeIndividual11/01/2013
Flashner, CraigCorporate directorIndividual11/01/2013
Generations Healthcare Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/24/2013
Prestige Administrative Services, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/01/2013
Flashner, CraigOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/24/2013
Perlstein, YitzchokOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/24/2013
Rogers, StaceyOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/20/2014

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on September 5, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 5, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 5, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Medilodge of Sterling's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Medilodge of Sterling 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Medilodge of Sterling get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 5, 2025. The Michigan average is 9.9.
Has Medilodge of Sterling been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Medilodge of Sterling accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Medilodge of Sterling?
CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to Medilodge. Legal business name: STERLING OPCO, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection