Home / North Dakota / Minot
600 S Main St., Minot, ND 58701 · Ward County · (701) 852-1255
76 certified beds, about 34 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1971
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355031 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since May 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $39,212 in the last three years; the largest was $17,063, and the latest is dated November 24, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.01 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.00 of those hours.
88.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).
CMS links it to North Shore Healthcare, an affiliated group of 59 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, resident and family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for 1of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) dependent on staff assistance for toileting. Failure to maintain a clean and sanitary bathroom does not promote a homelike living environment or enhance the resident's quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to promote care in a manner that maintained or enhanced residents' dignity for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #11 and #14) who required assistance with personal hygiene/care. Failure to assist with personal hygiene and appropriately clothe residents does not promote the resident's mental well-being or dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly utilize assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents and/or injury for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) observed during a pivot transfer. Failure to utilize gait-belts placed residents at risk for falls and/or injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #11) observed during cares and storage of resident supplies. Failure to follow infection control practices while handling soiled linen, while providing cares for resident in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and disinfecting shared equipment has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse/neglect for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #4) who utilized a commode for toilet needs. Failure to place the call light within reach and check on the resident while on the commode resulted in discoloration to the resident's buttocks, a bruise to the wrist, and has the potential to cause anxiety, fear, and psychosocial harm. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following discovery of the incident.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to report an incident of abuse/neglect to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #4) left on the commode for toilet needs. Failure to report incidents of neglect may result in Resident #4 and other residents experiencing abuse and/or neglect and psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of facility housekeeping checklist, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 6 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #3, #7, #16, #23, #25, #133) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident #4 and #9) and 1 of 1 storage rooms. Failure to maintain equipment and maintain a safe, clean, sanitary environment may result in injuries does not provide a homelike living area for residents or promote quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or their representative and the State Long Term Care Ombudsman a written notice of transfer and bed-hold notice for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #3, #7, #11, and #26) and 1 closed record (Resident #32) reviewed for hospital transfers. Failure to provide a written notice of transfer, a written copy of the bed-hold notice that includes the reserve bed amount, or notify the State Ombudsman of the transfer does not allow the residents and/or their representative to make informed decisions regarding their rights or inform the State Ombudsman of the transfer.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.19.1), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 4 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #5, #7, #20, and #23) and one closed record (Resident #30). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #21) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to transcribe physician's orders and obtain laboratory tests as ordered may result in adverse health effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #17) dependent on staff for bathing. Failure to provide bathing as scheduled may result in poor personal hygiene and decreased self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the hospice contract, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records contained the hospice election form for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #20) receiving hospice services. Failure to obtain the hospice election form limits staff's ability to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the hospice.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility documents, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) investigation and interview, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from sexual and mental abuse for 5 of 30 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) and 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #7) identified on a staff members electronic device through the review of images/videos. Failure to protect residents from sexual abuse may result in mental and emotional distress, and physical injury. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action the facility implemented immediately following the incident. During the on-site investigation of the facility reported incident, the survey team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 12/30/24 at 5:17 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of a facility reported incident, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) who experienced unwanted sexual contact from another resident. Failure to protect the resident from sexual abuse placed the resident at risk for mental and emotional distress. This citation is considered past noncompliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 supplemental resident (Resident #138) identified as having a stage IV pressure ulcer and exposed hardware. Failure to evaluate risk factors that may impact the development of a pressure ulcer, and implement, monitor, and modify interventions to reduce those risk factors resulted in Resident #138 developing an avoidable, facility-acquired pressure ulcer. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) reviewed for care conferences. Failure to notify the resident representative of the care conferences does not allow the representative to be fully informed of the resident's current status.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2, #18, and #28). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #6 and #16) observed for insulin preparation and administrations. Failure to properly prepare insulin pens and administer the insulin correctly may result in residents receiving an inaccurate dose.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) observed during medication administration. Failure to obtain a medication label for an insulin pen and identify and open date may result in a resident receiving an incorrect or ineffective dose of insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide dignity for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #21). Failure to address the resident with the name of the resident's choice does not preserve the resident's personal dignity or enhance the quality of life and places the resident at risk for anger, anxiety, lack of self-esteem, and other forms of emotional distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide personal privacy for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #26) observed during a glucometer check and insulin administration, and 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #335) observed during personal cares. Failure to provide privacy in a manner/environment that maintains bodily privacy does not preserve the resident's right to privacy or enhance their quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 1 of 5 sampled resident (Resident #335) reviewed for edema (fluid retention). Failure to ensure timely and consistent implementation of support stockings may result in worsening edema.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #24) reviewed for restorative therapy received the services developed by the therapy staff. Failure to consistently provide restorative nursing/therapy services may adversely affect the residents' abilities to maintain their range of motion (ROM), balance, strength, and mobility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for 3 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #21, #185, and #235) observed during dressing changes and/or blood glucose monitoring. Failure to follow infection control practices for wound care (Resident #21) and blood glucose monitoring (Resident #185 and #235) has the potential for transmission of communicable diseases and infections to residents, staff, and visitors.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 24, 2025 | Fine | $9,620 |
| December 31, 2024 | Fine | $17,063 |
| May 16, 2024 | Fine | $12,529 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.01 | 4.42 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.33 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.33 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.67 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 88.1% | 48.8% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 90.0% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.84 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.28 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.09 in April to June 2025 to 4.01 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 1.00 | 4.28 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 34 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.06 | 1.07 | 4.22 | 3.64 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 27 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.67 | 1.16 | 3.87 | 3.17 | 3.3% | 0 of 92 | 28 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.09 | 1.21 | 4.32 | 3.50 | 0.3% | 0 of 91 | 30 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Dakota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.57 | 0.92 | 4.81 | 3.96 | 11.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.03 | $17.51 to $23.06 | 6,840 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.95 | $28.03 to $31.26 | 1,920 |
| Registered nurses | $38.81 | $33.47 to $44.75 | 11,340 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.6 | 19.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.6 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.3 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Minot Health and Rehab, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (32.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
32.7% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Dakota: 0 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Dakota: 2 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · North Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
60.7% this home
Median of homes: North Dakota50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Dakota0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 42 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: North Dakota2.9% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 42 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: North Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MINOT HEALTH AND REHAB LLC. CMS links this home to North Shore Healthcare, a group of 59 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minot Health and Rehab LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 11/13/2015 | |
| Peshek, Paul | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 11/01/2015 | |
| Minot Health and Rehab LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/13/2015 | |
| Peshek, Paul | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Minot Health and Rehab LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/13/2015 | |
| Baumann, Troy | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Hoehn, Jeffrey | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Peshek, Paul | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Peshek, Paul | Corporate director | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Baumann, Troy | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Hoehn, Jeffrey | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Minot Health and Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/13/2015 | |
| Baumann, Troy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Hoehn, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/13/2015 | |
| Peshek, Paul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/13/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.