Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Kansas City

Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

4301 Ne Parvin Road, Kansas City, MO 64117 · Clay County · (816) 702-8000

118 certified beds, about 101 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2018

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265870 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 24, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since December 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.42 of those hours.

60.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to Tutera Senior Living & Health Care, an affiliated group of 25 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
11E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 21, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly transfer resident (Resident #1), in a safe manner, when staff did not use two staff members and the sit to stand lift (a mechanical lift used to transfer residents) from bed to shower chair, as directed in the resident's plan of care. The resident fell, resulting in a fracture to the right femur. Facility census was 95. On 04/21/2026 the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance that began on 03/30/2026. The Administrator immediately began an investigation and audit to identify incorrect care plans. The administrator implemented corrective actions to include re-education for nursing staff to provide care as directed in each resident's care plan and Kardex. [...]
December 30, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    F809 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve meals in accordance with facility policy and scheduled mealtimes. This affected two of five sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) The facility census was 97. Review of facility undated policy titled Dining Service Mealtimes, included, there should be no more than 14 hours between the time the evening meal is offered, and the breakfast meal is offered, or 16 hours if a substantial evening snack is provided. A substantial evening snack included a protein source and a fruit or bread source. Review of the facility mealtimes posted in the hallways and dining room showed:-Breakfast is served at 8:30 A.M.-Lunch is served at 12:30 P.M.-Dinner is served at 5:30 P.M.1. [...]
July 24, 2025Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to discard expired leftovers in the refrigerator, failed to wear beard nets and hand wash while working in the kitchen, failed to maintain proper standards of cleanliness and storage in the kitchen area, and failed to take accurate temperature readings of cooked food items. This affected all residents by putting them at risk for a food borne illness. The facility census was 95. [...]
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a manner to maintain their dignity when staff failed to knock on a resident's door and wait for a response before entering which affected one of the 19 sampled residents, (Resident #57), and when staff stood to assist Resident #29 to eat. The facility census was 95. [...]
  3. E
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives when staff did not provide satisfactory meals or offer evening (HS) snacks to four residents (Resident #5, #60, #71, and #76), failed to honor resident menu choices for two residents (Resident #33 and #55), failed to serve meals according to one resident's preferences (Resident #8), failed to offer to one resident menu items prepared for the meal (Resident #11), and failed to offer condiments to the alternate dining room. This affected eight of 19 residents sampled. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, dated 12/2024, showed each resident residing in this community has the right and will be afforded the right to a dignified existence and self-determination. [...]
  4. E
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    F569 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide personal funds and a final accounting within thirty days upon discharge for two residents (#111, #112). This affected two of 19 residents sampled. Facility census was 95. Request for a policy covering resident funds upon discharge was not provided by the facility;1. [...]
  5. E
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    F606 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the Nurse Assistant (NA) registry prior to employment to ensure all newly hired employees did not have a Federal Indicator (marker given to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect for four out of the 10 sampled employees and failed to check the Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) prior to employment to ensure all newly hired employees did not have negative records/backgrounds for two out of 10 sampled employees hired since October 2024. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's abuse policy, revised on 1/2024 showed- Each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff, volunteers, and other residents. All employees will have a criminal and state/federal required criminal background checks completed prior to start of employment. 1. [...]
  6. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, by not following physician orders regarding oxygen maintenance of tubing and/or oxygen flow rate on four of the 21 sampled residents, #30, #82, #107 and #108. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's policy Oxygen Administration dated 3/20/25 showed:-to verify that there is a physician's order for oxygen administration;-to check the tubing connected to the oxygen cylinder or concentrator to assure that it is free of kinks;-to turn on the oxygen and start the flow of oxygen at the rate ordered. [...]
  7. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff discarded expired medications and biologicals stored in the rehabilitation nurse's medication room. The sample size was 19 residents. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated policy, Medication Administration, showed:Adherence to this medication administration policy is essential to ensure the well-being and safety of the residents. All staff members are expected to follow these guidelines strictly and to report any issues or deviations from the policy. Continuous improvement and open communication are encouraged to uphold best practices in medication administration. Residents who self-administer must have a profile only medication administration record (MAR) which lists their medications and indicates that they self-administer. [...]
  8. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when the facility failed to ensure that staff used proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing cares for two of the 19 sampled residents (Resident #2 and # 10) and failed to ensure that new staff had completed a Tuberculin (TB) skin test prior to working. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility policy Infection and Prevention and Control Program (IPCP), dated 2019, showed: [...]
  9. E
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    F925 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when numerous flying insects were observed by three residents (Resident #60, #71, and #76) throughout the facility. This affected three of 19 residents sampled. Facility census was 95. Request for facility Pest Policy not provided; Record review of facility pest service, showed:- 7/11/25 Vendor observed fly activity around dumpsters and applied fly treatment. Food residue on equipment and food filth on walls and drains under dish machine, interior door left open;- 6/10/25 Vendor observed fly activity around dumpsters and applied fly treatment. Food residue on equipment and food filth on walls and drains under dish machine, interior door left open; 1. [...]
  10. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 19 sampled residents (Residents #69) by not addressing incontinence care with person-specific goals, measurable objectives, and time frames in order to evaluate the resident's progress towards obtaining his/her goals. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's Care Planning policy, dated 12/2024, showed:- Every resident will be assessed using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) according to the guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual;- Upon completion of comprehensive assessments, CAAs will be triggered to flag areas of concern that may need to be addressed in the care plan for the resident;1. [...]
June 28, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store foods in sealed containers in the freezer, ensure the cleanliness of the ice machine, and use adequate hand hygiene during food service in one of one kitchen. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of foodborne illness to all 96 residents.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for three of four residents (Resident (R) 247, R14, and R2) reviewed for implementation of EBP with chronic wounds or indwelling devices (intravenous (IV) line, enteral feeding tubes, urinary catheter, or central venous catheter) who were candidates for EBP of 25 sample residents. These failures created the potential to spread multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) throughout the facility.
  3. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one out of four residents (Resident (R) 37) reviewed for abuse out of 25 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect resident safety at the facility.
  4. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse for one of four residents (Resident (R) 37) reviewed for abuse out of 25 sample residents. This had the potential to affect resident safety in the facility.
  5. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for two of three residents (Resident (R) 345 and R3) reviewed for care plan accuracy of 25 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify the inaccurate medical diagnosis for R345 and did not revise the care plan to address hospice services for R3. Failure to update the care plan could result in the residents not receiving care to meet their specific needs.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatment orders and pressure ulcer prevention measures were implemented for one of two residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for pressure ulcers of 25 sample residents. These failures had the potential to lead to wound deterioration or the development of avoidable pressure ulcers.
  7. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications when one of five residents (Resident (R) 10) was given two separate doses of psychotropic medications without any documented clinical need for either medication of 25 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect the safety of all residents who received psychotropic medications.
November 8, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained physician's orders and assessed residents for safe administration of medication to be kept at the bedside for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2). The facility census was 96. The facility provided no policy on medication administration. 1. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/6/23, showed: -Cognitive skills intact; -Diagnoses included diverticulitis (an inflammation or infection in one or more pouches in digestive tract), diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood sugar is too high), and rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue that releases a damaging protein in blood). Review of care plan, dated 11/6/23, showed the staff were to administer medications as ordered. [...]
December 22, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

21 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 24, 2025, 2 on June 28, 2024, 17 on December 22, 2022.

Every fire safety citation21 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · July 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · July 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · June 28, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · June 28, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
    E 18 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · December 22, 2022 · Waiver
  7. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
    K 223 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Install resident room doors of proper design and width.
    K 233 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. E
    Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
    K 354 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 22, 2022 · Waiver
  16. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. E
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  21. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · December 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.863.433.86
Registered nurses0.420.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.323.013.42
Nurse aides2.40
Licensed practical nurses1.04
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)60.9%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover56.3%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.83 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.08 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.83 in April to June 2025 to 3.86 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.860.424.083.32 4.3%0 of 90101
Oct to Dec 20253.870.444.053.40 4.2%0 of 92101
Jul to Sep 20253.620.423.743.31 4.7%0 of 92102
Apr to Jun 20253.830.514.033.31 2.6%0 of 91100
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.418.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.51.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.72.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.14.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.02.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.617.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.74.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.623.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.926.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.113.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.32.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.72.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

47.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 203 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

13.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 216 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 101 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

53.9% this home

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 104 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.7% this home

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.4% this home

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: NORTHLAND REHABILITATION & HEALTH CARE CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Tutera Senior Living & Health Care, a group of 25 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Tutera Group, Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/18/2017
Brooks, KileyCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2013
Walnut Creek Management Company LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/18/2017
Bloom, RandallOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/18/2017
Brooks, KileyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/18/2017
Tutera, JosephOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/18/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 21, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 30, 2025: "Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2025: "Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center get at its last inspection?
10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 24, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to Tutera Senior Living & Health Care. Legal business name: NORTHLAND REHABILITATION & HEALTH CARE CENTER, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection