Home / Kentucky / Calvert City
10456 Us Highway 62, Calvert City, KY 42029 · Marshall County · (270) 898-6288
100 certified beds, about 79 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 185195 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 25, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Kentucky average is 2.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 16 health citations since August 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $15,646 in the last three years; the largest was $7,823, and the latest is dated June 13, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.95 across Kentucky and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.60 of those hours.
67.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kentucky average 46.4%).
CMS links it to Signature Healthcare, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Observations revealed containers filled with a dark liquid that were opened, not dated, and/or labeled. This had the potential to affect 76 of 76 residents. Observation during the initial kitchen tour on 06/03/2024 at 11:15 AM, revealed five drink containers that were not labeled, dated, or had expired in the walk-in cooler.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to have an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pest. All 76 residents had the potential to be affected. Observation during the initial tour on 06/03/2024 at 11:15 AM, revealed rodent and bird droppings in the emergency food storage supply room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program to prevent, recognize, and control the onset and spread of infection to the extent possible related to clean supplies stored with Biohazard Waste in an outside storage building.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented for one of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #66 (R66)). R66 was post-op from a surgical procedure performed on 04/26/2024. However, record review revealed the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan to monitor the surgical incisions until 05/07/2024. On 05/15/2024, R66 was seen by the Podiatric Surgeon for complaints of left ankle pain and was transferred to the emergency room (ER) to be evaluated. The ER assessed and diagnosed R66 with diffuse redness, swelling, purulent and foul smelling drainage of the left ankle surgical incisions. R66 was admitted to the hospital for intravenous antibiotic therapy on 05/15/2024 and discharged on 06/04/2024. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #66 (R66)). The facility admitted R66 from the hospital post-treatment for an ankle fracture. On 04/26/2024, R66 underwent an open reduction internal fixation trimalleolar to repair the left ankle. The facility failed to implement the physician's orders or provide wound care to R66's incisional cites as ordered. On 05/15/2024, R66 was seen by the Podiatric surgeon for complaints of left ankle pain and was transferred to the emergency room (ER) to be evaluated. The ER assessed R66 for diffuse redness, swelling, purulent and foul smelling drainage of the left ankle surgical incisions. Further review revealed R66 met sepsis criteria. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with/encouraged to perform hand washing before meals and the facility staff failed to avoid touching ready-to-eat foods with their bare hands during meals. This affected two (2) of three (3) halls observed. In addition, the facility did not maintain proper clean to dirty techniques in the laundry room, for one (1) of one (1) laundry room. Also staff failed to ensure proper dirty linen placement while providing incontinent care for Resident #43. Further observations revealed personal protective equipment (PPE) was not properly disposed of after use or before exiting residents' rooms who were on isolation for two (2) of two (2) residents observed on isolation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity by failing to close the privacy curtain during care and failed to address the resident in a dignified manner by calling the resident a feeder. This affected one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #43).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for notification of changes in condition (Resident #41).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan for one (1) of twenty-four (24) sampled residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #24). Resident #24 did not have a care plan developed for activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident had scheduled care conferences with involvement from the resident representative. This affected one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for participation in care planning. (Resident #48).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide supervision and verbal cueing to complete oral hygiene for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #13).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure two (2) of two sampled residents received nail care and foot care (Resident #43 and Resident #68). Staff failed to provide Resident #68 with adequate nail care and Resident #43 with adequate nail and foot care.
Inspectors wroteBased on an observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide activities per resident's preferences for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for activities (Resident #24).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to obtain orders for an indwelling urinary catheter, failed to obtain orders for catheter care, and failed to secure an indwelling urinary catheter for one (1) of one (1) sampled residents reviewed who had an indwelling urinary catheter (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five (5%) percent. Two (2) errors were made in twenty-five (25) opportunities, for a medication error rate of eight (8%) percent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide pneumococcal vaccines for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations (Resident #54 and Resident #15).
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 13, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 13, 2024 | Fine | $7,823 |
| June 13, 2024 | Fine | $7,823 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kentucky | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.47 | 3.95 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.99 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.81 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.06 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 67.7% | 46.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.80 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.67 on weekdays and 2.99 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.84 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.47 | 0.60 | 3.67 | 2.99 | 4.6% | 0 of 90 | 79 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.47 | 0.58 | 3.62 | 3.10 | 5.0% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.77 | 0.69 | 4.01 | 3.15 | 7.8% | 0 of 92 | 77 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.84 | 0.50 | 4.02 | 3.37 | 11.3% | 2 of 91 | 79 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kentucky, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.85 | 0.71 | 4.04 | 3.40 | 3.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.45 | $17.38 to $21.21 | 23,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.07 | $26.10 to $31.29 | 8,570 |
| Registered nurses | $38.96 | $36.38 to $46.73 | 50,300 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kentucky | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.2 | 13.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.4 | 16.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.9 | 24.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.6 | 13.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Oakview Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Kentucky: 38 better, 49 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 107 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kentucky: 0 better, 12 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 133 eligible stays.
7.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kentucky: 0 better, 6 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.
63.5% this home
Median of homes: Kentucky49.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kentucky0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kentucky2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
83.3% this home
Median of homes: Kentucky98.1% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LP CALVERT CITY LLC. CMS links this home to Signature Healthcare, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shc Ky Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2013 |
| Asbr Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2018 | |
| Jjla LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Lpsnf LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Shc LP Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Wheaten LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Steier III, Elmer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Bullock, Stacey | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/26/2024 | |
| Harrison, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Kentucky. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.