Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Houston

Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente

10800 Flora Mae Meadows Rd, Houston, TX 77089 · Harris County · (832) 328-2350

128 certified beds, about 104 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676333 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 19 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.26 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.21 of those hours.

58.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 16, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Not yet corrected
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 of 18 residents (Residents #2, #3, #13 and #22) reviewed for care plans. -The facility did not develop Resident #2's care plan related to bladder and bowel incontinence. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan included her diagnoses diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, pain, Dehydration and Psychosocial wellbeing that were triggered on her admission assessment. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #13, and Resident #22 had a Comprehensive Care Plan in place for pressure ulcers/injury. [...]
  2. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Not yet corrected
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a preadmission PASSAR Level 1(PL-1) screening accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #4) of 6 residents reviewed for PL-1 screenings. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASSAR Level 1 screening for Resident #4. The PL-1 screening for Resident #4 did not reflect the diagnosis of PTSD that was present on admission. This failure could place residents with mental illness of not receiving a PASSAR Evaluation, individualized care, or special services to meet their needs. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 7/16/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally on 7/12/2025 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had a diagnosis of PTSD (a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event either being part of it or witnessing it). [...]
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Not yet corrected
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan by the interdisciplinary team after assessment or change of condition for 2 of 21 residents reviewed for care plan revision (Residents #7, #42). Resident # 7's fall on 3/21/26 was not documented in the comprehensive care plan. Resident # 42's fall on 4/6/26 was not documented in the comprehensive care plan. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving proper care.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Not yet corrected
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #13 and #22) observed for pressure ulcer/injury treatment. LVN A failed to ensure wound care was provided in accordance with accepted standards of nursing practice by failing to use aseptic wound cleansing technique, including using separate clean gauze for cleansing the wound bed and the peri wound during pressure ulcer/injury treatment. This failure could place residents at risk for contamination, infection, delayed wound healing, and further decrease in quality of life.
April 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 15, 2026
    Inspectors wrotePurpose for Visit: Complaint and Incident Investigations. Entrance date: 4/22/2026Census: 102Intakes:2988707297733729832282975728298799829764842989108 Abbreviations:ADM: AdministratorCMA: Certified Medication AideDON: Director of NursingG-tube: GastrostomyHCI: HydrochlorideMCG: microgramMg: milligramsNP: Nurse Practitioner Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys to meet the needs for 1 out of 2 medication (Medication Cart #1) carts reviewed for pharmacy service in that: The facility failed to ensure CMA B did not leave medications on top of the mediation cart. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications, choking and respiratory distress. [...]
March 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from PASSR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning and transition of care for 1 (Resident#1) of 1 residents reviewed for PASSR services. The facility failed to submit the NFSS form in a timely manner to coordinate with the PASRR unit. This failure could place residents who were PASRR positive at risk of not getting the PASARR services for a better quality of life and could lead to a decline in health. [...]
March 5, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for nursing services received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents.
December 1, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (CR #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to perform an assessment on CR #1 when she reported to have trouble breathing. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in treatment or diagnosis, a decline in the resident's condition and/or the need for hospitalization and prolonged treatment.
August 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviewed, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for implementing abuse policy. -The facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedures when Nurse A did not report to the Administrator that Resident #1's family member reported to Nurse A on 08/16/25 that CNA A allegedly hit Resident #1 on his right eye, on an unknown date. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse to go undetected, to continue due to lack of identification, investigation, and reporting in accordance with policy, serious psychological and physical harm, and injury.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for reporting of alleged allegations. - The facility failed to ensure Nurse A reported to the facility Administrator when Resident #1's family member's reported an alleged abuse allegation. [...]
May 22, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 3 of 6 Residents (Resident #95, Resident #64, and Resident #356,) reviewed for the use of side rails. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff obtained physician orders and consent for the use of side rails for Residents #95, #64 and #356. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, hinder residents from getting out of bed, and/or cause a decline in resident's ability to engage in activities of daily living.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each residents individuality for 2 of 8 resident (Resident #36 and Resident #86) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA G treated Resident #36 with respect and dignity when CNA G left Resident #36 without a brief and exposed while in the hallway after leaving her room. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN R and CNA M treated Resident #86 with respect and dignity when LVN R and CNA M made the resident get out of bed and take a shower after she refused. These failures could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth.
  3. D
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    F790 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 was referred to the dentist after she complained of tooth pain. This failure could place residents at risk of pain and decline in health.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #36 and Resident #86) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA G followed appropriate infection control and hand hygiene procedure when providing care to Resident #36 and Resident #86 2. LVN U failed to follow appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions; and, failed to wash or sanitize her hands prior to, and after providing incontinent care to Resident #86. These failures could place the residents at risk for infection and cross-contamination.
May 9, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment for 1 of 8 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for resident rights in that: 1. Resident #1's linen had not been changed in 8 days, had dried fecal matter and food crumbs. This failure could have caused skin breakdown, infections and dignity issues. Findings Included: Observation on 5/7/2025 at 12:04pm, revealed Resident #1 linen was dirty due to dry fecal matter, and food crumbs. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 5/7/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, functional quadriplegic, pain in right and left shoulders, muscle wasting and atrophy and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed C0500: [...]
  2. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received her bed baths on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays on the morning shift as scheduled. This failure could have caused residents skin breakdown, discomfort, and embarrassment.
April 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. CNA A fell asleep while feeding Resident #1 lunch on 04/18/2025 and did not wake up to evaluate Resident #1 after she began to cough. This failure placed residents who required feeding assistance at risk of aspirating food particles, pneumonia (an infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs), and possible death.
March 21, 2024Standard inspection · 0 citations
November 13, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 4 of 4 resident's (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4) reviewed for PASRR. -The facility failed to submit authorization of PASRR Habilitative Services for Resident#1, #2, #3, #4. This failure could place residents identified at a level II for PASRR evaluation at risk for their specialized services not being provided in a timely manner.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse, neglect or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made for 1 (CR#1) out of 4 residents reviewed for reporting alleged abuse and neglect. -The facility failed to report CR#1's right hip fracture that was discovered on 10/27/2023 to the state agency. This failure could place residents at risk for not having incidents reported as required and continued abuse and neglect which could result in diminished quality of life.

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 16, 2026, 2 on May 22, 2025, 1 on March 21, 2024.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · May 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · March 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.263.393.86
Registered nurses0.210.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.892.983.42
Nurse aides2.00
Licensed practical nurses1.04
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)58.9%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover87.5%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.41 on weekdays and 2.89 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.13 in April to June 2025 to 3.26 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.260.213.412.89 0.0%0 of 90104
Oct to Dec 20253.100.193.232.76 0.5%0 of 92108
Jul to Sep 20253.210.243.352.86 0.0%0 of 92104
Apr to Jun 20253.130.253.252.85 1.6%3 of 91103
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.515.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.20.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.33.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.414.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.23.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.19.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
39.225.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.712.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.22.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

37.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

6.1% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BOOKER HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Booker Hospital District5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%12/01/2021
Armstrong, DwayneCorporate directorIndividual03/01/2004
Bartosiewiez, MatthewCorporate directorIndividual01/17/2008
Clevenger, JoshCorporate directorIndividual08/05/2021
Hoover, ShawnCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2021
Sheppard, RichardCorporate directorIndividual01/15/2002
Wade, HunterCorporate directorIndividual12/17/2020
Pecot, SandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/05/2025
Booker Hospital DistrictAdp of the SNFOrganization02/26/2025
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center IncAdp of the SNFOrganization02/26/2025
Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/26/2025
Regency IHS Rehab LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/26/2025
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/26/2025
Wellsential of Magnolia LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/26/2025
Clapp, BarbaraAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2021
Dekowski, DonovanAdp of the SNFIndividual12/16/2024
Lucas, DeniseAdp of the SNFIndividual12/16/2024
Mougouris, TasoAdp of the SNFIndividual12/16/2024
Norman, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual12/16/2024
Pecot, SandraAdp of the SNFIndividual05/05/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 19, 2025: "Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 22, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.89 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 16, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente?
CMS lists 20 owners and managers, and links the home to Wellsential Health. Legal business name: BOOKER HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection