Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Puxico

Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

540 North Highway 51, Puxico, MO 63960 · Stoddard County · (573) 222-3125

60 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265496 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 17, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since March 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.64 of those hours.

50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to Circle B Enterprises, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
3E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 17, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, dated November 2022, showed: [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control practices when staff performed incontinent care for three residents (Residents #3, #14, and #35) out of three sampled residents, catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for two residents (Residents #3 and #35) out of two sampled residents, wound care for two residents (Residents #3 and #12) out of two sampled residents, and during glucose monitoring and insulin administration for four residents (Residents #5, #26, #28, and #36) out of four sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure the laundry building remained in good condition to promote infection control. The facility census was 40. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag was maintained in the proper position for two residents (Residents #3 and #35) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 40. Review of the facility's policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care, dated August 2022, showed:- Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor;- Keep the drainage bag lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary bladder. 1. [...]
July 24, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for three residents (Resident #21, #23 and #33) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility's census was 31. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders; - Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff training. 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record showed: - Diagnoses of type 1 diabetes mellitus (an autoimmune disease that leads to the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells); [...]
  2. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of ongoing assessment and monitoring for one (Resident #21) out of one sampled resident receiving dialysis (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) after returning from treatments. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hemodialysis Catheters-Access and Care of, last revised 2001, showed: Care of arteriovenous fistula (a surgical connection made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access) and arteriovenous graft (a type of access used for hemodialysis): - Check for signs of infection (warmth, redness, tenderness, or edema) at the access site when performing routine care and at regular intervals; [...]
  3. D
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    F728 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two nurse aides (NA) completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nurse Aide Qualification and Training Requirements, revised August 2022, showed: - The facility will employ any individual as a nurse aide for more that four months full-time, temporary, per diem, or otherwise, unless: that individual is competent to provide designated nursing care and nursing related services; and that individual has completed a training program and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the state; [...]
  4. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reconciled narcotics (a process that allows one staff to reconcile the exact narcotic inventory on hand with another staff) at each shift change for one out of two medication carts. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substances, last revised November 2022, showed: - The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications; - Controlled substances inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow up; [...]
  5. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an error rate of less than five percent (%) when medications were administered. There were 26 opportunities with two errors made, for an error rate of 7.69%. This practice affected two residents (Resident #30 and #23) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, last revised April 2019, showed: - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders; - Medication errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff training; [...]
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two vials of Aplisol (a solution used during a tuberculosis (a serious bacterial infection that mainly affects the lungs) test were dated when opened. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 31. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised February 2023, showed multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Review of the manufacturer's recommendations for Aplisol, revised November 2013, showed the medication will be discarded 30 days after date opened. Observation on 07/23/24 at 9:10 A.M., of the locked refrigerator in the medication room showed two opened vials of Aplisol solution not dated. [...]
March 31, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These practices had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 36. Record review of the facility's Food Preparation and Service policy, dated 11/2022, showed: - Food and nutrition service employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; - When meals are assembled in the kitchen and then delivered to residents' rooms or dining areas to be distributed, covering foods is appropriate, either individually or in a mobile food cart; [...]
  2. E
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility staff) assessments within the required time frames for one resident (Resident #18) out of 12 sampled residents and five residents (Resident #131, #132, #133, #181, and #184) outside of the sample. The facility census was 36. Record review of the facility's Resident Assessments policy, revised March 2022, showed: - The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring the appropriate resident assessments and reviews are completed; - The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) (the manual used to help staff gather definitive information on the resident's strengths and needs which must be addressed in the MDS and care plans) provides detailed information on timing and submission of the assessments. 1. [...]
  3. E
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, within the required timeframe for two residents (Resident #16 and #23) of 12 sampled residents and 15 residents (Resident #1, #8, #11, #17, #22, #81, #82, #83, #84, #85, #86, #133, #181, #184, and #185 ) outside the sampled residents. The facility's census was 36. Record review of the facility's Resident Assessments policy, Revised March 2022, showed: - The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the appropriate resident assessments and reviews are completed; [...]
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility's census was 36. Record review of the facility's Maintenance Service policy, revised December 2009, showed: - Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment; - The Maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times; - Functions of maintenance personnel include, but are not limited to: maintaining the building in compliance with current federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines; maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards; maintaining the fire alarm system and emergency generator system in good working order; [...]
  5. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility), assessment for three residents (Resident #18, #19, and #23) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility's census was 36. Record review of the facility's Resident Assessments policy, Revised March 2022, showed: - The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the appropriate resident assessments and reviews are completed; - The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) (the manual used to help staff gather definitive information on the resident's strengths and needs which must be addressed on the MDS and care plans) provides detailed information on timing and submission of the MDS assessments. 1. Record review of the Resident #18's medical record showed: - An admission date of 2/4/21; [...]
  6. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise care plans with specific interventions tailored to meet individual needs for three residents, (Resident #15, #19, #134) or include the resident and/or the guardian for four residents (Resident #15, #18, #19, and #134) and the interdisciplinary care team (IDT) (a group of health care professionals from diverse fields who work in a coordinated effort toward a common goal for a resident) for two residents (Resident #15 and #134) out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 36. Record review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered policy, revised March 2022, showed: [...]
  7. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of ongoing assessments, monitoring, and communication between the facility and the dialysis (a process for removing waste and excess water from the blood) center for one resident (Resident #15) out of one sampled resident. The facility's census was 36. Record review of the facility's End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Care of a Resident With policy, revised September 2010, showed: - Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care of these resident; - Education and training of staff includes the type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the resident's condition; [...]

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on November 17, 2025, 3 on July 24, 2024, 2 on March 31, 2023.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. F
    Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
    K 753 · November 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · November 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · July 24, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · July 24, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · July 24, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. L
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · March 31, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · March 31, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.923.433.86
Registered nurses0.640.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.523.013.42
Nurse aides2.58
Licensed practical nurses0.70
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)50.0%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover40.0%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.51 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.08 on weekdays and 3.52 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.39 in April to June 2025 to 3.92 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.920.644.083.52 0.0%0 of 9036
Oct to Dec 20253.660.523.893.08 0.0%0 of 9239
Jul to Sep 20253.890.514.133.29 0.0%0 of 9238
Apr to Jun 20253.390.553.602.85 0.0%0 of 9138
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.118.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.51.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.82.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.84.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.217.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.14.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.123.515.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

38.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 47 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 16 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PUXICO #1 INC. CMS links this home to Circle B Enterprises, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Circle B Enterprises Holding Company Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%04/01/1996
Bedell, DonaldCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2001
Beaird, ToddCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Bedell, DonaldCorporate officerIndividual01/06/1997
Agh1 LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/02/2016
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/23/2021
Bedell, DonaldOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/06/1997
Caldwell, FredOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/19/2024
Fleetwood, ElaineOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2023
Garris, DellaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2024
King, BobbiOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/15/2024
Bedell, BryanIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual05/27/2025
Agh1 LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/25/2025
Circle B Enterprises Holding Company IncAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/1996
Fg LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization12/02/2016
Forvis Mazars LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization08/16/2021
Mid States IncAdp of the SNFOrganization11/01/2010
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/06/2025
Van De Ven LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2000
Beaird, ToddAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Caldwell, FredAdp of the SNFIndividual05/19/2024
Fleetwood, ElaineAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2023
Garris, DellaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2024
King, BobbiAdp of the SNFIndividual06/15/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2024: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2024: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 17, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 24 owners and managers, and links the home to Circle B Enterprises. Legal business name: PUXICO #1 INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection