Home / Pennsylvania / Philadelphia
4712 Chester Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19143 · Philadelphia County · (215) 727-4450
123 certified beds, about 117 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395628 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since December 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated June 27, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.76 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Nationwide Healthcare Services, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the meals and dietary services, reviews of the resident council and food committee meeting minutes, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to provide meals at regular time frames and in accordance with resident needs and preferences. (Residents R2, R28, R68, R97, R114 and R116).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined facility did not ensure to develop and care plan related to a resident's diagnosis for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R133)
Inspectors wroteBased upon review of clinical records, interview with staff and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure a resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, to a laceration identified after a fall incident for one resident of 24 resident records reviewed (Resident R17).
Inspectors wroteBased upon review of clinical records and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident received services to maintain vision for one of 24 resident records reviewed (Resident R83).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication between the facility and a dialysis provider for two of three residents receiving dialysis reviewed (Residents R1, and R32 ).
Inspectors wrotePharmacy Services Facility did not ensure to provide medications and/or biologicals, as ordered by the prescriber, to meet the needs of resident ([NAME]) Based on observations, review of resident's clinical record and interview with staff, it was determined that facility failed to ensure timely reordering and availability of mediations from pharmacy for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R24)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations during medication administration, review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, as well as interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations of care and services, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that for one of two residents reviewed for oral health services, the facility failed to provide prompt and routine dental care for each resident. (Resident R9)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate medication administration records for one of 23 residents reviewed. (Resident R24)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers and discharges for nine of nine months reviewed (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, and September).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their representatives could file a grievance/concern anonymously by failing to ensure that grievance or complaint forms were available to residents or their representatives without asking for two of two units reviewed. (First floor and Second floor)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that dietary preferences were honored for three of 23 residents (Residents R72, R97, R65).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documents, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that meals and snacks were provided at appropriate times for two of two floors observed (First and Second floor).
Inspectors wroteBased on review clinical records, review of facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents of their rights, rules, regulations, and responsibilities prior to and/or upon the resident's admission for three out of twenty-three residents reviewed. (Residents R29, R74, R317) Findings Include: Resident Council held on October 2, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. with ten awake, alert, and oriented residents revealed that when asked about resident rights being reviewed there were l residents stated they have not received a copy or had a copy reviewed with them. Review of Resident R29's clinical record reveled the resident was admitted on [DATE] and the resident's admission packet was not reviewed with the resident until August 21, 2024. Interview held with Admissions staff, Employee E3 on October 3, 2024 at 12:20 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide copies of medical records as requested in a timely manner for one of one residents reviewed for medical record request (Resident R317).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, observation, review of clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure feeding assistance was provided for one of twenty-three residents reviewed. (Resident R80) Findings Include: Review of facility documentation titled, Facility Food Service Program states, Policy and Procedure: Red/Yellow Program- the facility has developed a program to identify residents more easily at mealtime who are at nutritional risk and is in need of supervision, partial assist, or extensive feeding assistance during mealtimes. The following outlines the procedure for flagging those residents. 1. The residents on the list will receive a RED sticker or YELLOW sticker on their meal tags in addition to their usual white napkin. Red Program-Extensive Feeding assistance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate orders, care plan, and maintenance related to respiratory care were in place for one of twenty-three resident's reviewed. (Resident R83). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP Support with a revision date of March 2015 states, Purpose- 1. To provide the spontaneously breathing resident with continuous positive airway pressure with or without supplemental oxygen. 2. To improve arterial oxygenation (PaO2) in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive/obstructive lung disease. 3. To promote resident comfort and safety. Observation on September 30, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. of Resident R83 in their room revealed the resident had a a CPAP machine bedside. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician assessment was completed related to unplanned weight loss for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident R21).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record and interview with staff, it was determined facility did not ensure that medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents R6 and R58)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to post contact information for the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program as required for two of four nursing units that was accessible to residents and their representatives. (First floor and Second Floor) Findings Include: On October 1, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. a facility tour was conducted with the Director of Social Services Employee E7 to observe where the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program postings were on the first floor and second floor units. Observation during the tour of the first-floor unit revealed there was no information posted as required for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the most recent Department of Health Survey results were in a place readily accessible to residents and visitors for two or two nursing units. (First floor and Second Floor) Findings Include: On October 1, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. a facility tour was conducted with the Director of Social Services Employee E7 to observe where the Department of Health Survey binder was located in the facility. Observation of the facilities front lobby revealed the Department of Health survey results binder was behind the desk in the main lobby not accessible for residents or visitors without having to ask. Review of binder revealed the information in the binder also was not up to date. The last results in the binder were from the annual survey dated March 11, 2022. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility investigation reports, hospital record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents (Resident R1) reviewed was free from physical abuse and neglect which resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who sustained a head injury, hematoma to the right side of the face, lip laceration and required transfer to the hospital. This deficiency was identified as past non-compliance. (Resident R1) Findings Include: A review of the facility policy, titled Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, dated July 2017 stated, the purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. General Guidelines: at least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards for two of two units observed. (Unit One and Unit Two) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Storage of Medication with a revision date of April 2007 states, The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrgiators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. During observation of unit one on February 27, 2024 at 10:50 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of resident's medical information on two or two nursing units. (Unit one and Unit Two) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights last revised December 2016 states, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. The unauthorized release, access, or disclosure of resident information in prohibited. All release, access, or disclosure of resident information must be in accordance with current laws governing privacy of information issues. All inquiries concerning the release of resident information should be directed to the HIPPA Compliance Officer. During observation of unit one on February 27, 2024 at 10:50 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents that maintains or enhances dignity and respect related to dining for two of two dining rooms observed. (First floor and second floor dining rooms.)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, facility policies and facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise a comprehensive person-centered plan of care in a timely manner, for one of 26 clinical records reviewed (Residents R19).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with staff and review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to failing to ensure that recommendations from the resident's cardiologist recommendations were followed for one out of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R24).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration for two of 26 residents observed. (Resident R79 and Resident R42).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility documents, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for one resident and failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R86 and Resident R4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of facility documents and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards for one of two medication rooms observed (second floor medication room).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were served per physician orders for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents R36, R31 and R71).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently implement an antibiotic stewardship program and maintain a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for one of six sampled residents for unnecessary medication usage (Resident R86).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately display facility daily nurse staffing hours as required for one of four days. Findings Include: On September 15, 2023, at 11:04 a.m. observations at the front receptionist desk revealed staffing data was posted for the previous day, December 13, 2023. Further observation revealed that the staffing indicated the projected number of staff, but the actual number was left blank. Further observations in the lobby area, including the front and back doors of the facility, the first and second- floor nursing units failed to reveal posted staffing data. Interview with the facility receptionist, Employee E10, on December 15, 20253 at approximately 11:06 a.m. confirmed the above-mentioned findings, that there was no staffing data posted anywhere in the lobby area. [...]
8 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 11, 2025, 4 on October 3, 2024, 1 on December 15, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 27, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.76 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.47 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.19 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.0% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 15.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.72 in April to June 2025 to 3.76 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.38 | 3.88 | 3.47 | 15.6% | 0 of 90 | 117 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.74 | 0.38 | 3.92 | 3.30 | 17.8% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.71 | 0.43 | 3.86 | 3.31 | 12.9% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.72 | 0.49 | 3.86 | 3.36 | 8.3% | 0 of 91 | 109 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.7 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.8 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Renaissance Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 58 eligible stays.
39.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 48 residents counted.
2.9% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
1.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: RENAISSANCE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Nationwide Healthcare Services, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gelley, Leah | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 01/01/2013 |
| Gelley, Meir | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 95% | 01/01/2013 |
| Nationwide Healthcare Services | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/16/2012 | |
| Gelley, Meir | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2012 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.