Home / Pennsylvania / Millmont
17350 Old Turnpike Road, Millmont, PA 17845 · Union County · (570) 922-3351
57 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395614 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 1, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 16 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.09 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.64 of those hours.
38.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Akiko Ike, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice to a resident's responsible party before the resident's room change for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely notification to a resident's representative of changes in payment coverage and liability for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident privacy for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services for an indwelling urinary catheter as ordered by the physician for one of one resident reviewed for urinary catheter concerns (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide professional dental services for two of two residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 27 and 46).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dependent resident assistance with nail hygiene for one of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living concerns (Resident 46).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the highest practicable care regarding a pacemaker for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 44).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's bed system for potential accident hazards for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 15).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist reported any irregularities to the attending physician (and the facility's medical director if applicable) and the Director of Nursing on a separate, written report; and that the attending physician documented a review and actions taken to address the identified irregularity in the resident's medical record for one of five residents reviewed for medication regime concerns (Resident 27).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records were readily accessible to individuals performing health oversight activities for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 27).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for three of three residents reviewed (Residents 13, 37, and 46).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by three of three residents reviewed (Residents 4, 42, and 49).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident needs regarding the accessibility of a call bell for one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident 39)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of select facility policies and procedures, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding the care of a pacemaker for one of one resident reviewed with a pacemaker (Resident 12).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility investigation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an accident regarding an elopement and implement interventions to prevent recurrence for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 51).
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.09 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.59 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.16 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.28 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.1% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.32 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.29 on weekdays and 3.59 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.18 in April to June 2025 to 4.09 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.64 | 4.29 | 3.59 | 2.3% | 0 of 90 | 52 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.04 | 0.60 | 4.20 | 3.65 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 52 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.15 | 0.67 | 4.33 | 3.69 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 49 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.18 | 0.62 | 4.36 | 3.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 52 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.4 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Rolling Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (41.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
41.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
12.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ROLLING HILLS NURSING AND REHABILITATION LLC. CMS links this home to Akiko Ike, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magyar, Sharon | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/15/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.