6832 Convent Boulevard, Sylvania, OH 43560 · Lucas County · (419) 824-3600
76 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366279 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 9, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since October 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
43.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical record review, review of the Ombudsman notification, staff interview, Ombudsman interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely and accurate required discharge documentation and notification to the Ombudsman office. This affected one (#9) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 68.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during meal service and ensured food was free from contamination. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except Resident #1 who was identified to not eat food by mouth. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician and within prescribed time frames, resulting in delay in administration of anticonvulsant medication, anti-diabetic medication, anti-dementia medication and anti-psychotic medication. This affected four (#12, #36 #40, #66 ) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to doff and appropriately store soiled personal protective equipment (PPE). This had the potential to affect all 23 residents on the second floor (#2, #3, #5, #10, #14, #15, #19, #22, #23, #24, #27, #29, #35, #36, #44, #51, #56, #62, #64, #66, #67, #70, and #71). The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to notify the family when a resident experienced a change in condition requiring a medication change. This affected one (#62) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were taken as self-administration assessments and according to policy. This affected two (#18 and #38) of two residents reviewed for self medication administration. The facility identified four residents participating in self medication administration in a facility census of 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician, and within prescribed time frames, resulting in a medication error rate above five percent (%). A total of 2 medication errors were observed out of 32 opportunities for a medication administrations calculating an error rate of 6.25%. This affected two (#12, #40) of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, fall investigation review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff members exercised care and caution around residents following a fall incident and failed to ensure fall incidents were thoroughly and accurately investigated. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 69. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/26/23. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the left lower limb, sepsis with septic shock, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left calf with fat layer exposed, contusion of left lower limb, acute kidney failure, coronary artery disease and respiratory failure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident account list review and business office file review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident when their personal funds account balance was within two hundred dollars of the state allowed limit. This affected five (#15, #23, #26, #39 and #47) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, review of safety data sheets, review of facility list, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous chemicals were securely stored in the second floor kitchen area. This had the potential to affect four (#12, #14, #15 and #40) residents identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independently mobile residing on the second floor. Additionally, the facility failed to fall interventions were in place as care planned for fall precautions. This affected one (#32) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, dated and stored in accordance with professional standards for food services safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except two (#61 and #65) residents who were identified as receiving no food by mouth. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, physician communication binder review, physician office staff review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician and dietitian of a residents significant weight loss. This affected one (#29) of two residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of beneficiary notices and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure advance beneficiary notification of non-coverage (ABN) was provided to residents who remained in the facility following the end of covered Medicare Part A services. This affected two (#29 and #66) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure reducing mattress was functioning. This affected one (#65) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the dietitian timely assessed a resident following a significant weight loss and failed to monitor weights as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#29) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by the physician. This affected two (#56 and #21) of 12 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received sliding scale insulin injections in accordance with the physician's order. This affected one (#56) of 12 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records regarding fall incidents. This affected three residents (#32, #34, and #53) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 66 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in good repair. This affected one (#37) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer instructions for use, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate concentration of sanitizer was utilized during cleansing of kitchen equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 69 residents identified by the facility to receive food from the facility kitchen in a facility census of 69.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue appropriate notifications of the ending of skilled Medicare Part A services. This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for liability notices. The facility identified six residents with Medicare as their primary payer source and discharged from skilled services in the last six months. The total facility census was 69.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions to prevent potential for urinary contamination of an indwelling urinary catheter for one (#65) of one residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. The facility identified four residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 69.
18 fire safety citations on file: 10 on January 9, 2025, 2 on October 6, 2022, 6 on October 17, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.92 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.58 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.56 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.1% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 12.5% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.30 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.05 on weekdays and 3.58 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.92 in April to June 2025 to 3.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.92 | 0.48 | 4.05 | 3.58 | 6.4% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.96 | 0.49 | 4.10 | 3.60 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.92 | 0.50 | 4.09 | 3.48 | 2.8% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.92 | 0.54 | 4.10 | 3.47 | 3.1% | 0 of 91 | 68 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.9 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.6 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.7 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Rosary Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (41.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
41.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ROSARY CARE CENTER.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvania Franciscan Ministries | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2014 |
| Ellerbrock, Teresa | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2021 | |
| Belt, Jenifer | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Lampkowski, Gayle | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Schrein, Shannon | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2017 | |
| Lampkowski, Gayle | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Sylvania Franciscan Ministries | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/16/2025 | |
| Phillips, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/19/2013 | |
| Sylvania Franciscan Ministries | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/16/2025 | |
| Bazeley, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/1995 | |
| Phillips, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/13/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.