Dallas Retirement Village Health Center
377 Nw Jasper Street, Dallas, OR 97338 · Polk County · (503) 623-5581
121 certified beds, about 97 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385207 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 10, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 35 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.40 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.90 of those hours.
44.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Life Care Services, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
2507/23
111/24
312/24
604/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
25D
6E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 10, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to disinfect reusable resident equipment between residents for 2 of 6 halls reviewed for infection control and failed to ensure staff implemented proper hand hygiene while assisting residents with meals 1 of 2 dining rooms reviewed for dining observation. This placed residents at risk for exposure to infections and illness from cross contamination.
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident or resident representative was provided a bed hold policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of information regarding their right to return to the facility.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#59) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for injury from falls.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders for treatment of a change in skin impairment for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#80) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for a delay in treatment.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate transfer interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#59) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for injury.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff assisted a resident with toileting for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#67) reviewed for incontinence. This placed residents at risk for increased incontinence and lack of dignity.
December 6, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure community use CBG glucometers were properly cleaned and sanitized between resident use, failed to follow transmission based precautions, and failed to process laundry to produce hygienically clean laundry to prevent the spread of infection for 4 of 6 sampled residents (#s 33, 80, 83, and 84) and 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for bloodborne illness, exposure to infections, and contaminated laundry.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication storage temperatures were logged and failed to ensure proper labeling of biologicals for 3 of 3 medication storage refrigerators reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for receiving medications with reduced efficacy.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to serve, store, and label food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 dining rooms and 1 of 2 facility refrigerators observed for dining. This placed residents at risk for contamination and at risk for food borne illness.
November 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff for 1 of 4 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical abuse.
July 31, 2023Standard inspection · 25 citations
- F Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to conduct and complete a comprehensive facility wide assessment for 1 of 1 sampled facility. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality of care and quality of life.
- F Have policies and procedures ensuring the administrator's responsibilities for facility closure are completed successfully.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have policies and procedures in place in the event of a facility closure for 1 of 1 sampled facility. This placed residents at risk for displacement.
- F Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a qualified social service worker. This placed all residents at risk for unmet medically related emotional and social service needs of the residents.
- E Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor resident dining room choices and preferences for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 22, 37 and 50) reviewed for honoring choices. This placed residents at risk for increased isolation, lack of socialization and lack of self-determination.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain and provide a clean homelike environment for 4 of 6 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unclean and an unhomelike environment.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food textures and food temperatures were maintained for food trays served from 1 of 1 facility kitchen and for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 17, 22, 47 and 50) reviewed for food service. This placed residents at risk for food that was not palatable or appetizing.
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure records were complete and accurate for 5 of 8 sampled residents (#s 30, 32, 47, 58 and 89) reviewed for medications, dialysis and planned discharge. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#47) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity and quality of life.
- D Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect for their personal possissions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#56) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for lack of respecting private belongings.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain copies of Advance Directive for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for Advance Directives. This placed residents at risk for lack of end of life choices being honored.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were informed in writing of Advance Beneficiary Notification (ABN) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#98) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for financial hardship.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident grievance was addressed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#76) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns and loss of personal property.
- D Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to safe, resident-centered discharges for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 5 and 98) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs after discharge.
- D Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#89) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and implement bowel care for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 24 and 249) reviewed for choices and constipation. This placed residents at risk for increased pain.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain vision abilities were provided for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#56) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for impaired vision.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#32) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for respiratory complications.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received pain medication as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#248) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for unrelieved pain.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate pre and post dialysis assessments and accurate documentation for 2 of 2 sampled resident (#s 30 and 58) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for lack of dialysis assessments and complications.
- D Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure transportation was provided to a medical appointment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#249) reviewed for follow up appointments. This placed residents at risk for delayed care.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician in a timely manner for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete quarterly psychotropic medication reviews for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 17 and 42) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications.
- D Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided to 1 of 1 sampled resident (#56) reviewed for dental services. This placed residents at risk for a lessened quality of life.
- D Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide rehabilitation services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for declined mobility and lack of quality of life.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the storage of oxygen tanks for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#32) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for accidents.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 5 on April 10, 2026, 1 on December 6, 2024, 9 on July 31, 2023.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- F Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
- F Provide family notifications of emergency plan.
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.40 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.69 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.42 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.08 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.0% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.2% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.99 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.69 on weekdays and 4.69 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.15 in April to June 2025 to 5.40 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.40 | 0.90 | 5.69 | 4.69 | 5.2% | 0 of 90 | 97 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.42 | 0.95 | 5.66 | 4.83 | 5.6% | 0 of 92 | 96 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.22 | 0.89 | 5.50 | 4.52 | 3.9% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.15 | 0.79 | 5.39 | 4.53 | 4.3% | 0 of 91 | 100 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.7 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 32.4 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.3 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.6 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DALLAS HEALTH CARE CENTER L L C. CMS links this home to Life Care Services, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas Mennonite Retirement Community, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2010 |
| Lument Real Estate Capital LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/19/2003 | |
| Lument Real Estate Capital LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 04/19/2003 | |
| Adams, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Buckingham, John | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Fast, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Humphrey, Susan | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| McCleery, Debra | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Newman, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Ottaway, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Pauls, Debra | Corporate director | Individual | 03/26/2020 | |
| Ottaway, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Life Care Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/28/2012 | |
| Parrett, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Sanborn, Stefanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Suarez, Yolanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2026 | |
| Vellody, Nita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Life Care Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/16/2025 | |
| Parrett, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Sanborn, Stefanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Suarez, Yolanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2026 | |
| Vellody, Nita | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on April 10, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on April 10, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 10, 2026: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 6, 2024: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Independence Health and Rehabilitation Independence, 7.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Rivers Edge Rehabilitation and Care Sheridan, 11.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside Salem, 14 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Windsor Health and Rehabilitation Salem, 14.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Avamere Court at Keizer Keizer, 15 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Keizer Nursing and Rehabilitation Keizer, 15.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Salem Transitional Care Salem, 16.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Tierra Rose Care Center Salem, 16.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Dallas Retirement Village Health Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Dallas Retirement Village Health Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Dallas Retirement Village Health Center get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 10, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Dallas Retirement Village Health Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Dallas Retirement Village Health Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Dallas Retirement Village Health Center?
- CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Life Care Services. Legal business name: DALLAS HEALTH CARE CENTER L L C.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.