113 South Briarwood Drive, Sheridan, AR 72150 · Grant County · (870) 942-2183
121 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 045256 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 25, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Arkansas average is 2.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since January 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.24 hours per resident per day, against 4.02 across Arkansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
31.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arkansas average 49.5%).
CMS links it to Southern Administrative Services, an affiliated group of 35 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement dementia care needs on a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to remove expired medications from active rotation to avoid administration for one (Resident #21) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to remove expired medication from active rotation for which Resident #21 had an active order and was receiving as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure lab specimen supplies were not expired and lab specimens were stored in a refrigerator 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 46 degrees F and away from food items.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during laundry activities to prevent the spread of infection for the facility residents and failed to ensure contact precautions were consistently implemented for one (Resident #5) of one resident reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum requirements were addressed in the facility assessment, as evidenced by, the medical director was not actively involved in the organization of the facility assessment for 1 of 1 facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility (total census: 69).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility digital thermometer readings, the facility failed to maintain rehab resident rooms and the rehab hallway at a comfortable temperature level for residents in 1 of 5 hallways in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of residents transferred from the facility and send a copy of the transfer of notification for 2 (Residents #15 and #63) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident ' s property, as evidenced by a medication card of [Compound Narcotic Pain Medication], 5 milligrams (mg)/325 mg which contained 43 pills, was taken from a medication cart and the empty card was located in a dumpster behind the facility, for 1 (Resident #8) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for misappropriation of property.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received personal mail on Saturdays. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 60 residents who resided in the facility, as documented on the Midnight Census provided by the Administrator on 1/22/2024 at 1:52 PM.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure potential frozen meat items were not stored above frozen packages of food items; cartons of pasteurized eggs were not stored above butter logs; foods stored in the refrigerator, and dry storage area were covered and sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, foods were dated the day received or opened to assure first in, first out usage to prevent potential for food bone illness, the dining floor was free of stains; door frames were free of rotten wood; the kitchen vent over the dish washing machine was free of rust stains, the clean dish machine counter was replaced, the dish washer and kitchen walls were free of paint peeling; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene when assisting resident during meal service; laundry staff were properly trained to process contaminated linen; the folding table was free from contamination and to establish/implement a plan for Legionella to prevent the spread waterborne pathogens to reduce the potential for infections. This failed practice had the potential to affect 60 residents residing in the facility based on a list provided by the Administrator on 01/22/24 at 1:52 PM.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised at least quarterly and/or when residents' care needs changed, as evidence by failure to revise the plan of care to address the use of an antidepressant, an anticoagulant and insulin injections to ensure staff were aware of the necessary care, assessments and services required for 1 (Resident #43) of 17 (Residents #6, #8, #11, #17, #18, #19, #23, #26, #27, #29, #31, #32, #43, #52, #53, #54 and #58) sampled residents who had orders for an antidepressant, 1 (Resident #43) of 6 (Residents #25, #27, #32, #43, #270 and #271) sampled residents who had orders for an anticoagulant and 1 (Residents #17) of 6 (Residents #8, #9, #17, #19, #29 and #32) sampled residents who had orders for insulin, as documented on lists provided by the Director of Nursing on 01/26/24 at 11:56 AM, and 1 (Resident [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 5 residents who received pureed diets, as documented on the list provided by the Food Service Supervisor on 01/25/2024
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff complied with a resident's request to use the bathroom to promote dignity for 1 (Resident #6) of 13 (Residents #6, #8, #11, #17, #23, #25, #26, #29, #31, #43, #53, #54, and #270) sampled residents who required staff assistance for toileting, as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing on 1/26/24 at 11:56 am.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited and/or assisted to exercise their right to participate in development of their person-centered plans of care, to facilitate development of plans that would incorporate residents' goals, choices and preferences for 1 (Resident #25) of 6 (Residents #8, #17, #25, #29, #31 and #52) sampled residents whose Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scores were between 13 to 15 (13-15) which indicates the residents were cognitively intact, as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/26/24 at 11:56 AM.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 sampled resident who had a diagnosis of a mental disorder.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed within 14 days after a decline in activities of daily living (ADL) was noted, in order to address any potential changes in care needs for 1 (Resident #43) of 1 sampled resident who experienced an ADL decline.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed to address the resident's insulin injection order to ensure staff were aware of the required medication to promote continuity of care for 1 (Resident #32) of 6 (Residents #29, #8, #32, #9, #17, and #19) who had physician orders for insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care services were regularly provided to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (Resident #6) of 16 (Residents #6, #8, #11, #17, #23, #25, #26, #29, #31, #40, #43, #52, #53, #54, #58, #270 ) sampled residents who required assistance for nail care, as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing on 1/26/24 at 11:56 am.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 received proper incontinence care to prevent the potential for skin breakdown, poor hygiene, and/or infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were utilized only after an assessment for entrapment risk was conducted and documented for 1 (Resident #60) of 5 (Residents #27, #8, #54, #60, and #23) sampled residents who used bed rails.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner to ensure resident safety and care needs were met.
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 25, 2026, 1 on April 4, 2025, 2 on January 26, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.24 | 4.02 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.68 | 3.45 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.95 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.0% | 49.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 14.3% | 44.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.67 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.47 on weekdays and 3.68 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.90 in April to June 2025 to 4.24 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.24 | 0.50 | 4.47 | 3.68 | 2.1% | 0 of 90 | 59 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.06 | 0.42 | 4.27 | 3.55 | 2.1% | 0 of 92 | 62 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.02 | 0.51 | 4.23 | 3.48 | 2.1% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.90 | 0.47 | 4.12 | 3.34 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 65 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arkansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.05 | 0.40 | 4.28 | 3.47 | 2.0% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $16.55 | $14.52 to $17.34 | 17,260 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.22 | $23.82 to $29.43 | 10,010 |
| Registered nurses | $37.95 | $32.04 to $43.40 | 29,400 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 9.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.7 | 10.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 10.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.2 | 24.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.5 | 12.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sheridan Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
54.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Arkansas: 7 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 109 eligible stays.
9.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Arkansas: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 106 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arkansas: 0 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.
71.9% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas64.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
3.5% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas2.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
96.2% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas98.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GRANT SNF OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Southern Administrative Services, a group of 35 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4p2t1 Ops Holding LP | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2019 |
| Jej Assets LP | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Ponthie, Sharlot | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Logan, Jodi | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2019 | |
| Ponthie, John | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2019 | |
| Ponthie, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2019 | |
| Alexark1 LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Jej Management, LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 01/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arkansas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.