Home / Florida / Saint Petersburg
4500 Indianapolis St. Ne, Saint Petersburg, FL 33703 · Pinellas County · (727) 527-5801
109 certified beds, about 1 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1971
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105050 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 30, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since December 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
CMS links it to Gold Fl Trust II, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessments were completed accurately for five residents (#94, #47, #79, #90, and #87) of forty-four residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility 1) failed to ensure medications were available for two residents (#101 and #19) out of four residents sampled, 2) failed to assess a skin condition for one resident (#8) out of one resident sampled, and 3) failed to ensure neurological checks were completed for two residents (#105 and #79) out of four residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete for two residents (#104 and #106) out of three residents reviewed for leaving the facility against medical advice (AMA).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility 1) failed to ensure an effective infection control program related to isolation orders for one resident (#95) out of two residents sampled on contact precautions, 2) failed to properly use personal protective equipment (PPE) on two out of four units, and 3) failed to use proper hand hygiene during tray pass on one out of four units.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and resident representative were notified promptly of a change in condition for one resident (#105) out of 21 residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for one resident (#63) of 8 residents sampled for PASRR's.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure appropriate use of antibiotics for one resident (#79) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure one resident (#94) out of one resident sampled was offered timely dental services from an outside source.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety during three of four days of the survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #15) of 45 sampled residents by not scheduling a physician ordered appointment in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner, for one (Resident #29) of 14 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed for two (Resident #4 and Resident #10) out of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to create and implement personalized care plan interventions for one (Resident #41) of two sampled residents related to an identified safety concern. Resident #41 was identified as an elopement risk due to exit seeking behaviors. The facility failed to ensure the Resident's care plan and facility elopement identifier books were updated to reflect the known behavior.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure one medication cart was locked, and failed to follow their policy to secure medications appropriately in three of four medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, policy review, and the facility failed to ensure 1) dishware and food equipment designated for resident usage was stored as clean, and 2) potentially hazardous cooked food was cooled to 41 degrees Fahrenheit within an appropriate timeframe to prevent foodborne illness.
7 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 30, 2024, 4 on December 18, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | not reported | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | not reported | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | not reported | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | not reported | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | not reported | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS note on this home's staffing data: This facility submitted data that did not meet the criteria required to calculate a staffing measure.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Shore Acres Care Center and Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (26.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
26.0% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.
12.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 47 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Not reported
CMS note: The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Not reported
CMS note: The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Not reported
CMS note: The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SHORE ACRES NURSING AND REHAB LLC. CMS links this home to Gold Fl Trust II, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shore Acres Nursing Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/23/2022 |
| Fl Master Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Fl SNF Trust I | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Fl SNF Trust II | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/27/2022 | |
| Moreno, Carlos | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Garfinkel, Allan | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/27/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.