Home / Florida / Saint Petersburg
7101 Dr Martin Luther King Jr St. N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33702 · Pinellas County · (727) 527-7231
132 certified beds, about 115 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105749 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2026, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since September 2021, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $139,355 in the last three years; the largest was $85,730, and the latest is dated December 12, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.22 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.67 of those hours.
52.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Florida Institute for Long-Term Care, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report an elopement (an unauthorized exit from a secure unit) in accordance with State law through established procedures for one resident (#1) out of three residents sampled. Findings Included:During a phone interview on 06/25/2026 at 11:43 a.m., the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1 stated, I received a call from the facility letting me know [Resident #1] had escaped from the secure unit. I spoke to the police who told me they found Resident #1 quite a ways away from the facility. The facility told me he left during a fire drill. [Resident #1] was placed at the facility on the secure unit because of the history of exit seeking and attempting to leave from another facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. Ensure planned meals were held at and below required temperatures and were ready to serve to residents for consumption during one of three meal service observations, (on 4/1/2026). It was found several of the planned cold food times were held over 41 degrees F.; 2. The facility kitchen staff failed to conduct and promote good hand hygiene practices when handling food.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to promote and maintain dignity for residents during activities, during meal services, and while in their rooms for six residents (#87, #8, #34, #101, #52, and #51) out of sixty-one sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment in15 resident rooms (#1 through #15) out of 15 rooms located on the secured unit (300 Hall). Findings Included: During multiple facility tours of the secured unit (300 Hall) conducted from 03/30/3026 through 04/02/2026, observations revealed a plain halls layout with minimal decor, and no personal touches or affects throughout the physical environment. The resident rooms were observed to be bare with no personal effects and the overall atmosphere lacking warmth, comfort and familiar features. The Common areas appeared sparce, with little decoration and non-inviting seating which failed to promote a comfortable living environment for the residents. Attempts to interview the residents of the secured unit were unsuccessful due to noted severe cognitive impairments. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing related to 1.) administering medications within their scheduled time frames or two residents (#100 and #94) out of two residents reviewed; 2.) answering call lights in a timely manner as reported by all residents in the Resident council meeting.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to follow standards of care for infection control related to; 1. offering hand hygiene to residents before meals for three of three meal observations; 2. Failed to follow hand hygiene practices during meal services; 3. Failed to use personal protection equipment (PPE) in one room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 3 rooms with transmission-based precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure implementation of their abuse policy related to an allegation of physical abuse and failure to immediately remove the resident from the alleged perpetrator, for one resident (#80) out of one resident sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnoses for three residents (#10, #34, #62) of seven residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to 1. Positioning of adaptive eating equipment and 2. Ensuring call light bell/cords are within reach for two residents (#87 and #114) of sixty-one sampled residents, during four days (3/30/2026, 3/31/2026, 4/1/2026, and 4/2/2026) of four days observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised in a timely manner related to behaviors for one resident (#80) out of seven residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to provided assistance with meals for two residents ( #34 and #61) out of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings Included:1. During an observation on 03/30/2026 at 11:56 a.m., Resident #34 was observed sitting at a table in the dining room of the secure unit (300 unit). Resident #34 was observed attempting to scoop food off of his plate and dropping it onto the table. During an observation on 04/02/2026 at 11:46 a.m., Resident #34 was observed sitting at a table in the dining room of the secure unit (300 unit), scooping food off of his plate, and feeding himself. Review of Resident #34's admission record revealed an admission date of 02/24/2026. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a notification of change was completed for one resident (#129) out of one resident reviewed who was severely cognitively impaired.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure ongoing monitoring for changes in condition related to catheter use for one resident (#126) out of two resident sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation record review and interview, the facility did not ensure oxygen therapy was provided per physician orders for one resident (#126) out of one resident sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent, related to residents with behavioral health needs, as evidenced by the following: 1) accurately documenting behavior monitoring for three residents (#8, #62, and #80) out of three residents reviewed for behaviors; 2) supervising residents on the 300 (secured) unit for two residents (#61, and #34) out of two residents observed during dining; and 3) sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents on the secured unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure pharmacy recommendations related to labs were completed for one resident (#13) out of five residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record review, the facility did not ensure outside physician appointments were arranged/scheduled in a timely manner for one resident (#5) out of two residents reviewed.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of Resident #3's Hospital record revealed Resident #3 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 8/15/2024. The History of Present Illness (HPI) section revealed the following: Patient (Resident #3) is a [AGE] year old male with a past medical history of hypertension, alcohol use, tobacco use, and history of open reduction internal fixation, who presents to the ER (Emergency Room) with complaints of worsening right wrist pain. He was recently admitted on [DATE], due to a right wrist abscess, which was MRSA positive osteomyelitis for which he underwent irrigation/debridement. He required 6 weeks of IV Vancomycin as per ID recommendations for which he received a total of 10 days of antibiotics before leaving AMA on July 26th. Today (8/1/2024), the patient arrived at ER due to progressive worsening pain and swelling of the right wrist. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control and Prevention program by 1.) failing to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while caring for a resident under Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one resident (Resident #5) of two residents sampled for Infection Control precautions, and 2.) failing to ensure staff donned appropriate PPE while in the room of a resident under Transmission Based Precautions for one resident (Resident #4) of two residents sampled for Infection Control precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from neglect related to not ensuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was provided according to policy and procedure for one resident (#1) out of three reviewed for the CPR process; not performing laboratory tests and not following up on critical lab results for two residents (#11 and #13) out of three reviewed for lab testing and not ensuring treatment and care was in place for one resident (#11) out of three reviewed for an immune deficiency syndrome. These failures created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and/or the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Residents #1, #11, and #13 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy which began on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure an allegations of neglect were reported related to not ensuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was provided according to policy and procedure for one resident (#1) out of three reviewed for the CPR process; not following up on critical lab results for one resident (#11) out of three reviewed for lab testing and not ensuring treatment and care was in place for one resident (#11) out of three reviewed for an immune deficiency syndrome. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and/or the likelihood for serious injury and or death and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy which began on [DATE]. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on [DATE] and the severity and scope was reduced to an E.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review facility failed to ensure an allegations of neglect were investigated related to not ensuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was provided according to policy and procedure for one resident (#1) out of three reviewed for the CPR process; not following up on critical lab results for one resident (#11) out of three reviewed for lab testing and not ensuring treatment and care was in place for one resident (#11) out of three reviewed for an immune deficiency syndrome. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and/or the likelihood for serious injury and or death and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy which began on [DATE]. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on [DATE] and the severity and scope was reduced to an E.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, facility failed to ensure Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was performed according to professional standards on one resident (#1) out of three reviewed for CPR, the facility failed to ensure three out of five emergency carts were stocked correctly and ready to be utilized in a code blue, and failed to ensure six out of thirty-two nurses had hands-on and in person skills assessment training with their CPR certification. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Resident #1 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy which began on [DATE]. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on [DATE] and the severity and scope was reduced to an E.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to perform ordered laboratory (lab) testing, failed to inform the provider of critical lab results and/or failed to carry out provider orders in response to critical lab results for two resident (#11 and #13) out of three residents reviewed for labs. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Residents #11, and #13 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy which began on [DATE]. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on [DATE] and the severity and scope was reduced to an E.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, facility policy review and medical record review, the facility failed to facilitate a prompt response to a grievance of one of 4 sampled residents, the facility did not document, or communicate a resolution or outcome with Resident #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary equipment in the one of one kitchen related to 1) the dishwashing machine not reaching optimum wash and rinse temperatures, and 2) the sanitizer solution not reaching the dishwashing machine by way of pump and tubing properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the urinary drainage bag for one resident (#66) was maintained in a manner that allowed for urine to drain via gravity into the drainage bag and failed to store the urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag in a sanitary manner for one resident (#102) out of four residents with urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the status of one resident (#11) of thirty four residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to revise the individual comprehensive care plans for two residents (#77 and #11) out of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide care and treatment services in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by not ensuring an acute skin condition was assessed for one resident (#9) of four residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain one resident's (#102) tracheotomy in a clean, sanitary manner of one sampled resident with a tracheotomy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-eight medication administration opportunities were observed and two errors were identified for two residents (#59 and #14) of six residents observed. These errors constituted a 7.14% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#92) of thirty four sampled residents received a breakfast meal tray as ordered to meet nutritional needs during one meal (10/10/2023) of three meals observed.
6 fire safety citations on file: 4 on October 12, 2023, 2 on September 3, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 12, 2024 | Fine | $53,625 |
| January 24, 2024 | Fine | $85,730 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.22 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.04 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.03 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.53 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.7% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 52.6% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.13 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.29 on weekdays and 3.04 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.26 in April to June 2025 to 3.22 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.22 | 0.67 | 3.29 | 3.04 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 115 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.21 | 0.65 | 3.29 | 3.01 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 126 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.25 | 0.55 | 3.34 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 120 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.26 | 0.56 | 3.33 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 120 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 37.1 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.7 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Abbey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 101 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
33.3% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 121 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 121 residents counted.
95.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FI-THE ABBEY, LLC. CMS links this home to Florida Institute for Long-Term Care, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fi-the Abbey, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/03/2003 |
| Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/13/2003 |
| Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 07/01/2003 | |
| Jaffe, Howard | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Katz-Hall, Kathy | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Mullarkey, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Richmond, Penny | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Aegir Health Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2009 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/28/2011 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/13/2010 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/06/2012 | |
| Cloud, Kimberly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/16/2015 | |
| Maxwell, Tashaun | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/29/2022 | |
| Aegir Health Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/16/2025 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/16/2025 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/24/2025 | |
| Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/16/2025 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/24/2025 | |
| Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2003 | |
| Select Rehabilitation, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/19/2016 | |
| Cloud, Kimberly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/16/2015 | |
| Maxwell, Tashaun | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/29/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.