10421 State Route 40, Granville, NY 12832 · Washington County · (518) 642-2346
88 certified beds, about 86 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335711 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 18, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 8 health citations since November 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.00 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.69 of those hours.
63.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Centers Health Care, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, residents reported during interviews that the facility was short-staffed at times, which resulted d in call bells not being answered in a timely manner with long wait times for care to be provided. An analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on 10 occasions from 2/15/2025 to 4/13/2025, the facility did not meet their facility assessment for staffing needs. This is evidenced by: Upon entrance to the facility on 4/15/2025 at approximately 10:00 AM, 86 residents resided in two (2) units. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and two (2) of the two (2) resident unit nourishment rooms. Specifically, in the main kitchen, the dishwashing machine temperature display panel and floors under the dishwashing machine were soiled with food particles or dirt; the storage area for clean pots, pans, and food containers had multiple containers stacked together that were not thoroughly dried and contained moisture. In the A-Unit nourishment room, the refrigerator door gaskets were soiled with food particles, and in the B-Unit nourishment room, the refrigerator and floor were soiled with food particles or dirt. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (Case #NY00338414) survey, the facility did not ensure residents were provided the proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision for one (1) (Resident #86) of one (1) resident reviewed for vision. Specifically, for Resident #86, the facility did not ensure that the resident ' s glasses were replaced and follow up appointments for optometry were obtained. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) was encoded and transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #2 the facility did not ensure the Discharge - Return Not Anticipated MDS was encoded and transmitted to the CMS system within 14 days. Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of Parkinson's disease. dementia and adult failure to thrive. The MDS dated [DATE] documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, could understand others and could make themselves understood. The Discharge - Return Not Anticipated MDS had not been encoded and transmitted at the time of the recertification survey which occurred beyond 14 days of Resident #2's discharge. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and two (2) of 2 resident unit nourishment rooms. Specifically, cans of sweet potatoes and tuna had unacceptable dents exposing the food to adulteration; ground sausage was not cooled to 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) within 6 hours; one spray bottle was not labeled; and the concentration of quaternary ammonium compound chemical sanitizing rinse (QAC) was less than that required by the manufacturer. In the main kitchen, the shelf under the window air conditioning unit had raw, unsealed wood; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food brought for residents by family or visitors (food) was discarded when expired and other foods were stored in a way that is either separate or easily distinguishable from facility food. Specifically, a restaurant sandwich and restaurant prepared chicken wings were not labeled with resident names and dated; and one expired restaurant entre labeled with a resident name was not discarded. This is evidenced is as follows: During observations on 07/25/22 at 10:58 AM, in the A-Unit nourishment room refrigerator, a restaurant sandwich and restaurant prepared chicken were not labeled with resident names and were not dated; and one restaurant entre labeled with a resident name was dated 07/20/22 (5 days earlier than survey observations). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility did not refer residents with newly evident mental illness for a level II review for one (Resident #80) of two residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Specifically, the facility did not ensure for Resident #80, who was newly diagnosed with a mental illness, received a level 1 screen to determine if a level II screen needed to be done. This is evidenced by: Resident #80: The resident was admitted with diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder, post polio syndrome and vitamin D deficiency. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 10/31/19, documented the resident had severe impairment for cognition, was able to sometimes understand others, and sometimes able to be understood by others. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure an Infection Prevention and Control Program was maintained. Specifically, the facility did not ensure Infection Control Policy and Procedures were reviewed and/or revised on a yearly basis. This is evidenced by: During an observation on 11/25/19: - Infection Control Program did not include the date it was originated or the date it was updated. - Pneumococcal Vaccine for Residents Policy was dated 10/2016. - Antibiotic Stewardship Policy was dated 10/2017. During an interview on 11/25/19 at 12:01 PM, the Infection Control Coordinator stated she did not know if the Infection Control Policies were reviewed and revised at the corporate level since she noted the dates documented on the Infection Control, Pneumococcal Vaccine and Antibiotic Stewardship Policies were not current. [...]
17 fire safety citations on file: 11 on April 18, 2025, 4 on July 29, 2022, 2 on November 25, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.00 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.59 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.56 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.0% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 23.1% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.16 on weekdays and 2.59 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.37 in April to June 2025 to 3.00 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.00 | 0.69 | 3.16 | 2.59 | 1.3% | 0 of 90 | 86 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.14 | 0.70 | 3.33 | 2.66 | 1.4% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.47 | 0.68 | 3.65 | 3.02 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.37 | 0.69 | 3.58 | 2.86 | 1.9% | 0 of 91 | 84 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: NYS DOH Nurse Aide Training Programs (nursing homes), as of October 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Slate Valley Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.0 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.1 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.6 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.4 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Slate Valley Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
55.6% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CLR GRANVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to Centers Health Care, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abramchik, Amir | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 09/01/2017 |
| Weinberger, Hillel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 09/01/2017 |
| Boshes, Jeremy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.