17 Madison Street, Granville, NY 12832 · Washington County · (518) 642-2710
120 certified beds, about 118 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1971
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335331 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 18, 2024, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 23 health citations since March 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.01 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.
74.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Centers Health Care, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated (NY00346208 and NY00351484) survey, the facility did not ensure the provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, 1) an analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions from 12/01/2024 to 12/18/2024, the facility was below the minimum levels required. 2) several nursing staff members reported a lack of sufficient staffing, and 3) multiple residents reported during interviews that the facility was short-staffed at times, and this resulted in call bells not being answered timely and residents not getting out of bed in time for appointments and therapy. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00346208), the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident ' s choices for 10 (Resident #s 365, 368, 112, 56, 29, 73, 109, 75, 18, and 89) of 10 residents reviewed for quality of care, which included residents in every unit of the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to place and read the purified protein derivative test for tuberculosis (an infectious disease) for Resident #365 and Resident #368; the facility failed to notify a provider when Resident #365 ' s blood sugar was 61; the facility failed to monitor the vital signs of Resident #368 when the resident was newly admitted to the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00355835), the facility did not ensure that food and drink were palatable and attractive for 4 (Resident #s 97, 75, 8, and 107) of 7 residents reviewed for palatable and attractive food and drink. Specifically, Residents #97, #75, #8 and #107 complained of food being cold, unattractive, and not palatable. Additionally, Resident # 97 and #75 lunch ticket did not match what the resident received during their lunch service on 12/17/2024. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Food and Nutrition Services dated 1/2024 documented that the facility would provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain the vision ability for 1 (Resident #70) of 2 residents reviewed for communication. Specifically, for Resident #70, the facility did not ensure the resident, who had impaired vision, was provided with an optometry consultation to be evaluated for vision aids. This is evidenced by: Resident #70: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term breathing problem), hypertension (high blood pressure), and seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical discharges in the brain that can cause temporary changes in movement and consciousness). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review during a recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents ' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #112) of 1 residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, the facility failed to administer Resident #112 ' s pain medication in a manner that managed the resident ' s pain and which resulted in the resident expressing their pain was 10 out of 10, and Family Member #2 calling 911 to have Resident #112 sent to the hospital for care. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Medication Administration - Documentation, last revised 1/2019, documented that when administering medications, documentation must include, as a minimum, a. Name and strength of the drug; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that it provided or obtained emergency dental services to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #75) of 1 resident reviewed for Dental Services. Specifically, Resident #75 had broken a front tooth the week of 12/02/2024 and had not been seen by the dentist. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Dental Services, last revision date 9/2019, documented both routine and emergency dental services were available to meet the oral needs of each resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00355835), the facility did not ensure maintenance of acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (Resident #97) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #97 did not have weekly weights measured for monitoring of significant weight loss as ordered by the dietician for the weeks of 11/25/2024 and 12/09/2024. This is evidenced by: Cross-referenced to F804: Nutritive Value/Appearance, Palatable/Prefer Temp A facility policy titled, Weight Management, with a current revision dated of 3/01/2024, documented that the resident's weight shall be obtained within twenty-four hours of admission, weekly for four weeks, then monthly thereafter and more frequently as clinically indicated for the residents, and documented in the clinical record. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00278217), the facility did not provide needed care and services that are resident centered and in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #5) out of 11 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure the resident was assessed and that the physician was notified when Resident #5, a resident prescribed an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication, developed a nosebleed. The resident was not assessed by nursing staff when the nosebleed occurred; the resident then called for emergency services and was subsequently admitted to the hospital for treatment. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during a recertification and abbreviated surveys conducted 9/19/2022 to 9/23/2022, the facility did not ensure residents were provided a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on 3 of 3 units observed. Specifically, on Unit A, a strong, stale urine odor was noticed throughout the unit each day of the survey and resident rooms lacked a homelike environment in the absence of personalized items and décor. On Unit B the floors and ceiling tiles were soiled, and on Unit C the laminate trim was peeling away from the wall in a resident room. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that appropriate dishware was consistently utilized in accordance with facility policy on the B-wing nursing unit on 9/19/2022 and in the main dining area on 9/21/2022. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews during the recertification survey dated 09/19/22 through 09/23/2022, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and two (2) of 3 nourishment areas. Specifically, in the main kitchen, one #10 can of tomato sauce found in the common stock had a V-shaped dent; the pressure gauge servicing the automatic dishwashing machine was broken; the faucet servicing the 2-compartment sink was leaking. Additionally, multiple surfaces and equipment in the main kitchen and unit areas were soiled with food particles, splatters and grime. This is evidenced as follows: The main kitchen and unit kitchenettes were inspected on 09/19/22 at 11:30 AM. In the main kitchen, one #10 can of tomato sauce found in the common stock had a V-shaped dent; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure there was immediate notification of the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 (Resident #108) of 5 residents reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, for Resident #108, the facility did not ensure the physician was notified immediately after a change in mental status was identified on the morning of 7/21/2022. This was evidenced by: Resident #108: Resident #108 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and hypothyroidism. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a Level 1 Screen was completed prior to admission to the nursing home for 1 (Resident #35) of 19 residents reviewed for pre-admission screening. Specifically, for Resident #35, the facility did not complete a Level 1 Screen prior to the resident's admission to the facility. This is evidenced by: Resident #35: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 8/5/2022, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was rarely/never able to make needs known. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, or appealing options of similar nutritive value were provided for 2 (Resident #'s 20, and 42) of 3 residents reviewed for food. Specifically, for Resident #20, the facility did not ensure that all the items on the resident's meal ticket, or appealing options of similar nutritive value were provided on 9/20/2022 and 9/23/2022 and for Resident #42, the facility did not ensure that all the items on the resident's meal ticket, or appealing options of similar nutritive value were provided on 9/23/2022. This was evidenced by: Resident #20: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic heart failure, morbid obesity, and depression. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 2 (Resident #45 and #272) of 4 sampled residents and 1 (Resident #61) of 1 unsampled residents reviewed for accidents hazards. Specifically, for Resident #'s 45 and 61, the facility did not ensure the residents, with the diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and who received altered consistency diets, received adequate supervision and assistance while eating according to the comprehensive care plan; and for Resident #272, the facility did not ensure the resident, who was a high fall risk and had 6 falls in the month of February, had bilateral floor mats in place next to the his/her bed. This was evidenced by: Resident #45: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that the minimum staffing levels for Certified Nursing Assistants was met on 14 out of 14 days from 2/17/20 through 3/1/20; the facility did not ensure there was sufficient CNA staff on 3/1/20 to provide 6 (Resident #'s 16, 36, 40, 45, 77, and #320) of 20 residents on A Wing Side-1 with personal hygiene care in a timely manner and in accordance with each resident's care plan; For Resident #49, on A Wing Side-2, the facility did not ensure the resident received incontinence care in accordance with the resident's care plan; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure performance reviews of every nurse aide were completed at least once every 12 months and regular in-service education was provided based on the outcome of the reviews, and that the in-service training complied with the requirements of §483.95(g) for 5 (CNA #'s 1, 2, 3, 6, and #7) of 5 randomly selected Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's). Specifically, the facility did not ensure that CNA #'s 1, 2, 3, 6, and #7 had performance reviews at least once every 12 months and based on the review of the CNA education files, did not ensure at least 12 hours per year of in-service education that complied with the requirements of §483.95(g) related to dementia management training was provided. This is evidenced by: Refer to F tag 947 - In-service training must comply with the requirements of §483.95(g). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure required in-service training for nurse aides included dementia management training. Specifically, for 5 (CNA #'s 1, 2, 3, 6, and #7) of 5 randomly selected Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's), the facility did not ensure the required yearly in-service trainings included dementia management training. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Inservice Programming/Training CNA, dated 9/2019, documented the facility must provide and track a minimum of 12 hours of continued education to the CNAs with certain components including dementia management training. On 3/5/20 at 8:50 AM, a review of the CNA education files provided by the Administrator included the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 3 units and 1 (Resident #118) of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. Specifically, for Resident #118, the facility did not ensure the resident was treated with dignity and respect when he/she requested to use a bedpan. This was evidenced by: Resident #118: The resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of diabetes, morbid obesity and sepsis due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 2/26/20, documented the resident was cognitively intact, could understand others and could make self-understood. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure there was evidence that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #105) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, for Resident #105, the facility did not ensure there was evidence of an investigation to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment after the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 12/29/29 that resulted in a laceration over the left eyebrow, decreased consciousness, and a transfer to the hospital. This was evidenced by: Resident #105: The resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder and osteoarthritis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #'s 16 and 45) of 3 residents and 1 (Resident #49) of 1 unsampled resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Specifically, for Resident #'s 16, 45 and #49, the facility did not ensure the residents, who could not independently carry out activities of daily living, received incontinence care to maintain good personal hygiene and reduce their care planned risk for impaired skin integrity. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled ADL- Personal Hygiene last revised 10/2019, documented peri-care would be given with each incontinence episode, with AM/PM care and shower day. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Specifically, dumpsters were not closed. This is evidenced as follows. The garbage dumpsters were inspected on 03/01/2020 at 11:42 AM. The side doors of both dumpsters were open. Refuse was found in the dumpsters The Maintenance Director stated in an interview on 03/01/2020 at 11:42 AM, that he will speak with housekeeping about keeping the dumpsters closed. 10 NYCRR 415.14(h)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure it maintained an infection control program designed to help prevent the development or transmission of infection for 1 (Resident #19) of 2 residents reviewed for wound care. Specifically, for Resident #19, the facility did not ensure that standard precautions to include hand hygiene, and glove use were maintained during a dressing change. Also, the facility did not ensure the table was cleansed to prevent the transmission of infectious agents prior to the placement of dressing supplies on the table. This is evidenced by: Resident #19: The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of injury of right quadriceps muscle (large muscle in the upper leg), type 2 diabetes, and peripheral venous insufficiency (reduced blood flow to extremities). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute or serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Refrigerators are to be equipped with thermometers, food temperature thermometers are to be kept calibrated, and equipment and surfaces are to be kept clean. Specifically, thermometers were missing or not in calibration, and food contact equipment and non-food contact surfaces were not clean. This is evidenced as follows. The kitchen and unit kitchenettes were inspected on 03/01/2020 at 10:49 AM. The A Wing kitchenette refrigerator did not have a thermometer, and the B Wing refrigerator thermometer was broken. When checked for calibration in an ice bath, metal stem food temperature thermometers read 35 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 36 F. [...]
19 fire safety citations on file: 8 on December 18, 2024, 3 on September 23, 2022, 8 on March 5, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.01 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.68 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.75 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 74.3% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 58.8% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.15 on weekdays and 2.68 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.30 in April to June 2025 to 3.01 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.01 | 0.45 | 3.15 | 2.68 | 4.5% | 0 of 90 | 118 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.98 | 0.49 | 3.10 | 2.69 | 2.1% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.26 | 0.39 | 3.39 | 2.91 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.30 | 0.46 | 3.47 | 2.88 | 5.7% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: NYS DOH Nurse Aide Training Programs (nursing homes), as of October 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Granville Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.1 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.6 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.1 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Granville Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.
48.4% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.
5.0% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: IR OPERATIONS ASSOCIATES, LLC. CMS links this home to Centers Health Care, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicklick, Jeffrey | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 10/01/2017 |
| Goldman, Nathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Hendrix, Heidi | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lantzitsky, Aharon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Rozenberg, Kenneth | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Jafri, Mikram | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2024 | |
| Mailloux, Raymond | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/22/2024 | |
| Jafri, Mikram | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2024 | |
| Mailloux, Raymond | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/22/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.