Home / California / Culver City
Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF
3828 Delmas Terrace, Culver City, CA 90232 · Los Angeles County · (323) 836-7000
21 certified beds, about 16 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555874 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since December 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
April 30, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (the source of the injury was not witnessed by any person and the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident and the injury is suspicious because of its extent, location, the number of injuries at a time, or the number of injuries over time) to CDPH, Adult Protective Services (APS, the county agency responsible for investigating reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of elders and dependent adults), and the Ombudsman within 24 hours for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with state law and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Abuse, Elder & Dependent Adult. [...]
February 27, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide a Payroll Based Journal information for quarter 4. This failure had resulted in the facility not providing the required information regarding the quantity of staff assigned for safe and comprehensive care for all residents, as required by federal regulations. During a review of the Fiscal Year Quarter 4 2025 PBJ Staffing Data Report for the facility, dated 2/20/2026, the Fiscal Year Quarter 4 2025 PBJ Staffing Data Report indicated the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 10:34 AM, with the NM, the NM stated the information was submitted, just as it was for the previous quarters. The NM explained that the same happened for the last recertification survey, the PBJ Q4 data was not received, and there was no confirmation email after uploading the Quarter 4 staffing information. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were discarded and open food packets were labeled. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever potentially leading to other serious medical complications and hospitalization.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Perform hand hygiene for one of eight residents, Resident 11, after touching Resident 11's suction canister (a medical container used to collect and store mucus, blood, or saliva) .This failure had the potential to spread infectious organisms to other areas inside Resident 11's and outside Resident 11's room.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Provide a signed document offering, or declining, the COVID, influenza, and pneumococcal immunizations to one of eight residents, Resident 4 and failed to provide a signed document offering, or declining, the influenza vaccine to one of eight residents, Resident 11. This failure had the potential to neglect Residents 4 and 11 rights to refuse or receive immunizations from seasonal respiratory infections. During a review of Resident 4's admission Note, dated 12/11/2025, the admission Note indicated Resident 4 has chronic respiratory failure (a long-term, ongoing condition where the lungs cannot properly exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide). [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3), who was left in bed exposed. This deficient practice had the potential to violate Resident 3's rights.
November 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 1) medical order (a directive issued by a licensed physician) for a stat (immediately) electroencephalogram (EEG, a non-invasive test that records the brain's electrical activity to help diagnose conditions like epilepsy, head injuries, and other brain issues) was completed as directed by the physician. This deficient resulted in delay and can potentially cause the patient's condition to worsen or resulted in injury or harm such as prolonged seizures, permanent cognitive impairment, or the need for more invasive treatments, all of which can be prevented with timely action. [...]
December 15, 2024Standard inspection · 16 citations
- F Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased upon interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the facility's Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report (PBJ- a system created by Center of Medicare/Medicaid Services to collect auditable and verifiable staffing data from nursing facilities) was submitted for Quarter 4 Fiscal Year (July 2024-September 2024). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a negative impact on quality of care.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure two out of six sampled residents (Resident 5 and 8) scheduled showers were conducted twice a week. 2. Ensure staff sat at eye level and not standing up towering over Resident 8 while feeding. This deficient practice had the potential to result in making the residents feel intimated or unkept.
- E Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Provide a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- a form that Medicare providers and health plans must give to beneficiaries when their Medicare-covered services are ending) appeal process form to 3 residents (Resident 1, Resident 10 and Resident 67). This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents and/or their responsible parties not being able to exercise their right to file an appeal.
- E Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. The facility failed to ensure annual competencies were signed and dated by 3 employees. This deficient practice had the potential to result in providing incompetent and inadequate care for all residents.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a thermometer was inside of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator # 1. 2. Ensure frozen foods were dated and labeled in reach-in freezer # 1. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food expiration.
- D Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteDuring an observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 8) had an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) covered with a privacy bag. This deficient practice of not covering the indwelling catheter had the potential to make Resident 8 not feel humiliated (to feel ashamed).
- D Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the survey results and complaint investigation reports in the previous three years were posted in a place readily accessible to the residents and public. This failure had the potential for residents, visitors, family members, or family representative not being able to examine and compare the previous survey results, and facility's deficient practice and how they were corrected.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Complete and re-submit the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASARR - a tool to determine if the person had, or was suspected of having a mental illness, intellectual disability, or related condition) Level one (I) screening and refer one of two sampled residents (Resident 4) who had diagnoses of anxiety disorder (a condition that involves excessive and persistent feelings of fear, dread, and worry that can interfere with daily life), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest), and psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), to the appropriate state-designated authority for PASARR Level two (II) evaluation and determination. [...]
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 5) ventilator tubing (the tubing carries oxygen and air to and from the patient) was labeled and dated. This deficient practice of not labeling and dating the respiratory tubing placed Resident 5 at risk for respiratory infection (infections that could affect parts of the body involved in breathing).
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on tube feeding received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to: 1. Elevate the head of the bed while receiving formula through the gastrostomy tube (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4). This deficient practice had the potential to cause aspiration (inhalation of foreign materials) that can lead to pneumonia (lung infection) for Resident 4.
- D Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure intravenous ([IV] into or connected to vein) tubing was labeled and dated for one of two sampled residents (Resident 9) who was receiving IV antibiotic (drug that treats infection) treatment. This deficient practice had the potential to placed Resident 9 at risk for infection and IV therapy complications.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure expired medication was not kept in the medication storage refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential to result in administering expired medication.
- D Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out six sampled residents (Resident 8) had completed laboratory ([labs] blood samples to assess a patient's health status) test. This deficient practice of not completing labs placed the resident at risk for not receiving accurate medication treatment.
- D Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 13) had dental services. This deficient practice of not providing dental services had the potential to for Resident 13 to develop a mouth infection (a group of infections that occur around the oral cavity).
- D Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI- Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement-a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) meetings were held quarterly (every 3 months). This deficient practice had the potential to result in systemic issues within the facility.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 5) ventilator tubing (the tubing carries oxygen and air to and from the patient) was labeled and dated. This deficient practice of not labeling and dating the respiratory tubing placed Resident 5 at risk for respiratory infection (infections that could affect parts of the body involved in breathing).
October 2, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing professional standards were provided for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3), when: 1. No documentation of an assessment (to evaluate a resident ' s health) was found in Resident 1 ' s electronic health record (EHR - a digital version of a resident ' s medical history) when Resident 1 had heart rate of 106 beats per minute (bpm - the normal range is between 60 to 100 bpm, an elevated heart rate is greater than 100 bpm and may indicate many problems such as pain, infection, or anxiety). This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s elevated heart rate not being addressed for more than three hours from 8:19 p.m. to 11:38 p.m. 2. [...]
September 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- H Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent further potential neglect and have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated as indicated in the facility's Abuse Investigation policy for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 and 3) when: 1. Licensed vocational nurse (LVN - an entry-level health care provider who is responsible for rendering basic nursing care) 1 tied a sheet to the Resident 1 ' s bed frame and broken bedrail. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 falling out of bed and had the potential to result in unidentified neglect, mistreatment, and failure to protect Resident 1 from further neglect. 2. [...]
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policies and procedures were followed for of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's bedrail was tied with a sheet after it was found to be broken and the facility staff failed to monitor Resident 1 while the bedrail remained broken. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling out of bed and had the potential for risk of entrapment or strangulation due to the sheet tied from the bed rail to the lower bed frame.
- E Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was cared for by a health care clinician that has a current Basic Life Support (BLS, care that first-responders, healthcare providers and public safety professionals provide to anyone who is experiencing cardiac arrest [the heart stop functioning], respiratory distress or an obstructed airway) in accordance with the facility job description for Licensed Vocational Nurses. (LVN). LVN 1 who was assigned to work on the facility subacute unit (a unit that provide intensive care, but to a lesser degree than acute care), did not have a up to date BLS certification. This deficient practice had the potential of delayed provisions of emergency care for Resident 1 and the 39 residents in the subacute unit who wishes to have full treatment in a life-threatening situation.
September 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- L Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable room temperature ranging from 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F, A unit of temperature measurement) for 17 of 17 residents (Resident 1 to Resident 17) in the Sub-Acute (a medical facility that provides medical care to chronically ill patients who are medically stable) Unit. This deficient practice placed the 17 residents on the Sub-Acute Unit at risk for dehydration (excessive loss of body water) and/or heat stroke (internal body heat with complications involving the central nervous system that occur after exposure to high temperatures). [...]
December 3, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide prompt efforts to resolve grievances of residents voiced to the facility through the Resident Council Meetings for two of eighteen sampled residents (resident 9 and Resident 15) who used to attend to a monthly group meeting. This deficient practice resulted in unresolved residents' grievances related to delay in assistance for residents' care needs.
- E Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an activity program for five of five sampled residents (Residents 3, 9, 14, 15, and 16) who wanted to participate in activities. The failure to implement a plan to conduct activities in the absence of an activity coordinator placed the residents' mental, psychosocial, and emotional well-being at risk of feeling isolated and depressed. This deficient practice of not having an activity program meant the residents lacked substandard practice and care for their practical well-being.
- E Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the urine in the indwelling catheter tubing collecting bag for three out of eighteen sampled residents (Residents 9, 11, and 14). 1. Resident 11 had an indwelling catheter (inside the body that drains urine from the bladder into an outside bag) with noticeable sediment (accumulation of white blood cells) that was cloudy and without a privacy bag. 2. Resident 14 had a condom catheter (a soft latex applied over the penis that pushes urine through tubing) with noticeable sediment in the urine tubing with no privacy bag. 3. Resident 9 had an indwelling catheter with noticeable sediment in the urine tubing. [...]
- E Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 9 sampled residents' (Resident 7 and Resident 15) gastrostomy tube ([GT] tube placed directly into stomach to give direct access for supplemental feeding, hydration, or medicine) feeding formula was labeled with the date and time according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 7 and Resident 15 receiving tube feeding formula over the expiration or maximum formula hang time (how long a tube feeding formula should hang safely prior to discarding or changing) and could adversely affect the resident's health and wellbeing.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure stored food were labeled with open date and expiration date. 2. Ensure expired food were not stored in the kitchen and accessible for use in preparing foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This practice had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses which can affect the health and safety of all residents in the facility.
Fire safety inspections
3 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 27, 2026, 1 on December 3, 2023.
Every fire safety citation3 citations
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of medical gas and medical vacuum systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 10, 2024 | Payment Denial | 28 days from September 27, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | not reported | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | not reported | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | not reported | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | not reported | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | not reported | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS note on this home's staffing data: This facility did not submit staffing data.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for California
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| California, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.90 | $22.04 to $26.35 | 110,060 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.34 | $35.98 to $45.06 | 82,850 |
| Registered nurses | $67.44 | $58.87 to $83.25 | 338,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.6 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Hospitals System LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/08/2007 | |
| Southern California Healthcare System, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/29/1998 | |
| Chamber Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2021 | |
| David & Alexa Topper Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2012 | |
| Ivy Holdings Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2012 | |
| Ivy Intermediate Holding Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2012 | |
| Mpt of Culver City Pmh, L.P. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/23/2019 | |
| Mpt of Hollywood Pmh, L.P. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/23/2019 | |
| Mpt of Van Nuys Pmh, L.P. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/23/2019 | |
| Prospect Medical Holdings Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2012 | |
| Lee, Sang Bum | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/31/2012 | |
| Sabillo, Alfredo | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/21/2020 | |
| Samuels, Eric | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/03/2019 | |
| Sabillo, Alfredo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/21/2020 | |
| Katiraie, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/23/2025 | |
| Lee, Sang Bum | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/07/2014 | |
| Sabillo, Alfredo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/20/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on November 20, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 27, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 27, 2026: "Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 27, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP Los Angeles, 0.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Cheviot Hills Post Acute Los Angeles, 0.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 59 citations
- Marina Pointe Healthcare & Subacute Culver City, 1.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- Meadowbrook Behavioral Health Center Los Angeles, 1.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Vista Del Sol Care Center Los Angeles, 1.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- Marycrest Manor Culver City, 2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & Wellness Los Angeles, 2.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 63 citations
- Flower Villa, Inc Los Angeles, 2.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 40 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 27, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF?
- CMS lists 17 owners and managers. Legal business name: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.