Find a nursing home

Home / Maryland / Leonardtown

St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc

21585 Peabody Street, Leonardtown, MD 20650 · St. Marys County · (301) 475-8000

160 certified beds, about 118 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 215013 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 12, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Maryland average is 17, the national average 9.2).

None of its 20 health citations since August 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.52 hours per resident per day, against 3.87 across Maryland and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.

46.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Maryland average 40.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
March 12, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on administrative review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations of abuse timely after bruising of unknown origin on a resident was discovered This was found to be evident in 1(#74) of 6 residents' facility reported incidents reviewed during the annual Medicare/Medicaid survey.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician and according to accepted standards of nursing practice, including administering medications at the correct time. This was evident for 3 (#127, #58, #128) of 4 residents observed and reviewed for medication administration. According to accepted standards of nursing practice, including the patient medication rights outlined in the Maryland Nurse Practice Act, medications must be administered according to the right time, meaning medications should be administered at the time intended by the prescriber to maintain therapeutic effectiveness. The Findings Include: 1. A medication administration observation was conducted on 03/10/2026 at 10:05 AM for Resident #127. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration and proper assessment for self-administration. This was evident for 1 (#110) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication was clinically indicated and evaluated for continued need. This occurred for 1 (#32) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey.
November 22, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility was in good repair. This was evident for 5 resident rooms observed on the 4th floor nursing unit during the survey.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity when requesting assistance and by failing to ensure a Foley drainage bag was covered. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 40 (Resident #47 and Resident #461) sampled residents reviewed during the survey.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered the opportunity to participate in their care planning process by being invited to their care plan meetings. This was evident for 2 (Resident #12 and #31) out of 4 residents investigated for care planning during the survey.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on complaint, review of medical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transcribe a physician's order that directed nurses to obtain a wound care consult for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #313) out of 40 sampled residents reviewed during the survey.
  5. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1) a resident's safety was maintained during a transfer. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for accidents and 2) an order for seizure precautions on a resident were correctly maintained. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for position and mobility.
  6. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and documentation review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the walk-in refrigerator temperatures were documented accurately.
July 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed provide adequate notice to a resident (resident #1) prior to discharge. This was evident in 1 of 5 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.
  2. D
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    F624 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed prepare a resident (resident #1) for discharge. This was evident in 1 of 5 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.
  3. D
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    F626 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to allow a resident (resident #1) to return to the facility after transfer for emergency treatment. This was evident in 1 of 5 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.
  4. D
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    F835 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility's administration failed to provide leadership to facility staff to ensure CMS regulations are being followed when involuntarily discharging a resident (resident #1). This was evident in 1 of 5 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.
  5. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to document the discharge of a resident (resident #1). This was evident in 1 of 5 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.
August 27, 2019Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined facility staff failed to ensure that comprehensive person-centered care plans with measurable goals were developed 1) for participation in activities that enhance resident's quality of life for Residents #123, #125 and #35; and 2) for Resident #68 who used a lap buddy. This was evident for 4 of 50 residents whose care plans were reviewed during the survey.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that food was stored and prepared in sanitary manner. This practice has a potential of effecting all residents in facility.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of medical records and other pertinent documentation, it was determined a nursing staff member failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to Resident #198 when assisting him/her to stand. This was evident for 1 of 40 residents reviewed for falls during the survey.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of pertinent documentation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a nursing staff member washed her hands appropriately after passing medications to Residents #46 and #7. This was evident for 2 of 4 times nursing staff were observed for handwashing.
  5. C
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure survey results from the most recent Federal survey were readily accessible to residents without having to ask staff. This practice had the potential to affect all residents.

Fire safety inspections

18 fire safety citations on file: 7 on March 12, 2026, 7 on November 22, 2024, 4 on August 27, 2019.

Every fire safety citation18 citations
  1. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · March 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · March 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
    K 916 · March 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · March 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · March 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · March 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · November 22, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · November 22, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · November 22, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
    K 500 · November 22, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
    E 26 · November 22, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. D
    Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
    K 362 · November 22, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · November 22, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. D
    Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
    K 223 · August 27, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. D
    Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
    K 311 · August 27, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · August 27, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · August 27, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMarylandUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.523.873.86
Registered nurses0.540.840.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.093.473.42
Nurse aides2.07
Licensed practical nurses0.91
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)46.1%40.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover35.3%38.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.64 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.69 on weekdays and 3.09 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 19.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.74 in April to June 2025 to 3.52 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.520.543.693.09 19.1%0 of 90118
Oct to Dec 20253.660.523.853.17 10.5%0 of 92113
Jul to Sep 20253.700.573.903.19 11.2%0 of 92116
Apr to Jun 20253.740.593.953.20 7.9%0 of 91116
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Maryland, Jan to Mar 20263.730.743.883.348.0%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMarylandUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.020.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.40.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.31.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.12.43.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.522.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.35.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.513.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.821.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.69.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.51.21.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ST. MARY'S NURSING CENTER, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Kaur, KirandeepContracted managing employeeIndividual06/23/2010
Hall, TraceW-2 managing employeeIndividual11/20/2019
Hodges, LoisW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2017
Burton, CharlesCorporate directorIndividual01/22/2020
Densford, JosephCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2012
Farrell, JamesCorporate directorIndividual11/25/2019
Kubinec, TracyCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2012
Lancaster, HarryCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Morgan, ChristineCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Mortensen, DeniseCorporate directorIndividual02/01/2016
Prochnow, TerryCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Viar, WillardCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2013
Densford, JosephCorporate officerIndividual06/28/2017
Kubinec, TracyCorporate officerIndividual06/28/2017
Sterling, JudithCorporate officerIndividual06/28/2017
Viar, WillardCorporate officerIndividual06/28/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 22, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2026: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 22, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.09 hours per resident per day, below the Maryland average of 3.47.

Other nursing homes nearby

Maryland contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Maryland. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 12, 2026. The Maryland average is 17.
Has St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc?
CMS lists 16 owners and managers. Legal business name: ST. MARY'S NURSING CENTER, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection