Home / Maryland / Lexington Park
Chesapeake Shores Nursing Center
21412 Great Mills Road, Lexington Park, MD 20653 · St. Marys County · (301) 863-7244
125 certified beds, about 93 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1982
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 215142 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 9, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Maryland average is 17, the national average 9.2).
None of its 40 health citations since May 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $47,254 in the last three years; the largest was $47,254, and the latest is dated May 15, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.87 across Maryland and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.69 of those hours.
48.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Maryland average 40.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
405/19
2705/24
901/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
30D
6E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 9, 2026Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and observations, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure resident rights to eat in a location of their choice, and 2) failed to follow the resident's preference in care providers. This was found to be evident for breakfast and dinner services and had the potential to affect all residents, and evident in 1 (Resident #28) out of 2 resident reviewed for choices.
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a functional and comfortable environment to residents. This was found to be evident in 2 of 2 facility courtyard awnings.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to accurately code the resident's status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This failure was evident for 1 resident (Resident #4) out of 8 residents reviewed for MDS assessments during the facility's recertification survey.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice related to signing off resident care services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for wounds.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange vision appointments for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #41) out of 1 resident reviewed for vision.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure respiratory/oxygen equipment was properly labeled and dated. This deficient practice was evident for 2 (Residents #48 and #3) out of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory/oxygen therapy during the facility's recertification survey.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate resident records. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) out of 27 residents in the recertification survey.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection prevention and control practices. This failure was identified during observations of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care provided to 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #6 and #54) who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during the facility's recertification survey.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were educated on the benefits and risks of Influenza vaccine following a refusal. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #41) out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the facility's recertification survey.
May 15, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 27 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews of facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a full-time clinically qualified nutrition professional for the oversight of food preparation and the daily kitchen operation. All the residents in the facility have the potential to be affected by not having a qualified nutritional professional with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out food and nutrition services.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and documentation review it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure the dish washing machine was operating at the appropriate water temperature and sanitation levels, and 2) failed to ensure food has reached proper final internal cooking temperatures and/or all hot foods are held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher on the steam table. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that consumed food that was prepared by the kitchen. This was evident during random kitchen inspection/observations of food service conducted during the recertification survey.
- F Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure call devices were accessible to residents. This was evident 1) for 1 resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]-B) and 2) for all residents' bathrooms and facility shower rooms, during the initial resident screening and nursing unit observation of the recertification survey.
- E Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for residents. This was evident for 3 residents (Resident #74, #43, and #89) of 5 residents reviewed for pain during the recertification survey.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, and observations of the kitchen services with the testing of a food tray, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food at a preferable/palatable temperature. Food complaints and concerns were identified for 10 (#4, #23, #24, #30, #43, #45, #56, #72, #82, #289) of 19 residents selected in the final sample and a failed test tray was identified on the unit that was served last.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner as evidenced by failing to serve all residents at the same table at the same time during dining observations. This was evident for 1 of 40 residents observed during the survey (resident #83).
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident/responsible party was offered the opportunity to develop an advance directive for 2 residents (Resident #71, #74) of 5 residents reviewed for advance directives during the recertification survey.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents care areas and furniture were kept in good repair. This was evident for 1 resident's bedroom area (Resident #290) and for 1 shared bathroom (room [ROOM NUMBER]/223 shared bathroom) during the initial observation of residents' rooms during the recertification survey.
- D Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was identified for 1 resident (Resident #76) of 4 residents reviewed for transfer to the hospital.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to code accurately for the discharge status of a resident on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for one (Resident #87) of three residents reviewed for discharge during the annual survey.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with baseline care plans. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #82) of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheters/urinary tract infections.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and initiate comprehensive person-centered care plans for residents residing in the facility. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #71) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and for 1 resident (Resident #191) of 1 residents reviewed for falls during the recertification survey.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans after each assessment or as resident care needs became apparent or changed over time. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #82) of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care and 1 resident (Resident #76) of 1 residents reviewed for dementia during the recertification survey.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on a complaint, medical record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) staff properly assessed a resident on admission, and 2) staff monitored a resident's blood sugars . This was evident for 2 residents (Residents #347 and #24) of 40 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care to residents with pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #349) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the recertification survey.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record reviews and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment, care, and services to residents with a urinary catheters. This was evident for 2 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #93) of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI during the recertification survey.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on complaint, reviews of a closed electronic record, and staff interview, it was determined that 1) the nursing staff failed to obtain a physician's order for a specific diet, 2) notify a resident's physician when the nursing staff performed a daily concurrent review and a resident was not eating or consuming liquids, and 3) initiate a nutritional care plan to address a resident's history of choking. This was evident for 1 (Resident #339) of 40 residents reviewed during the survey process.
- D Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) employee records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to conduct and/or record yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months. This was evident for 3 (GNA #38, #39, and #40) out of 3 GNAs' employee files reviewed during this survey.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure narcotics removed from the resident's supply were administered to the resident, as evidenced by staff documenting the removal of narcotics without documentation of the need for the narcotic or documentation that the drug was administered to the resident. This was evident for 2 residents (#74, and #89) of 5 residents reviewed for pain management during the annual survey.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store a patient's medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #345) of 4 residents reviewed for personal property during an annual survey.
- D Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to document a resident's likes and dislikes and failed to provide supplemental dietary sandwiches. The was evident for 1 resident (Resident #56) of 19 residents selected in the finalized sample during the recertification survey.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) make electronic medical records available to the survey team and 2) maintain complete and accurate medical records. This was evident for 4 residents (Residents #4, #74, #90, and #339) of 40 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to utilize appropriate infection control processes when handling 1) a resident's personal pillows (Resident #19), and 2) residents' linen in the laundry room. This was evident during the investigation of the facilities infection control process during an annual survey.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to show proof that some residents in the facility and/or their Responsible Party (RPs) were provided education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines or that the vaccines were consented to and administered in the current year. This was evident for 2 (Resident #19, #30) of 5 residents reviewed who were eligible for Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines during the annual survey.
- D Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident bed rails were safely maintained. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #36) of 19 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.
- E Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility records, interviews with facility staff, and interviews with residents, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to ensure that all allegations of abuse, medication storage issues, and unusual incidents were thoroughly investigated and 2) failed to provide interventions to avoid repeated allegations. This was evident for 4 residents (Residents #36, #343, #345, #347) of 18 reported resident incidents reviewed during the survey.
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavioral health monitoring for residents. This was evident for 1 facility reported incident (#MD00193233) of 18 facility reported incidents reviewed during the recertification survey.
May 17, 2019Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of an upper body wheelchair harness for Resident #61. This was evident for 1 of 31 resident's reviewed during the survey.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that items used for personal hygiene were appropriately labeled and stored in a bathroom shared by Residents #64; #38; #15 and #158. This was evident for 4 of 31 residents reviewed during the survey.
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview with the Director of Nursing DON) the facility failed to provide a care plan for Resident # 52 going out to the hospital. This was evident for 1 out of 31 residents reviewed.
- D Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews it was determined the required staff posting information was not in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This was evident during the survey process.
Fire safety inspections
17 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 9, 2026, 8 on May 15, 2024, 5 on May 17, 2019.
Every fire safety citation17 citations
- E Meet other general requirements.
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Meet other general requirements.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2024 | Fine | $47,254 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Maryland | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 3.87 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.22 | 3.47 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.17 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.71 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.9% | 40.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 23.1% | 38.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.71 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 20.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.63 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.69 | 3.71 | 3.22 | 20.8% | 0 of 90 | 93 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.61 | 0.65 | 3.71 | 3.33 | 23.1% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.66 | 0.58 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 18.9% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.63 | 0.55 | 3.79 | 3.22 | 20.7% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Maryland, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.73 | 0.74 | 3.88 | 3.34 | 8.0% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Maryland | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 20.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.7 | 22.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 5.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 13.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.6 | 21.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.7 | 9.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: LEXINGTON PARK MD OPCO LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lexington Park Md Holdco LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2022 | |
| Mayer, Moishe | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 11/01/2022 | |
| Karim, Shahana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Mayer, Moishe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2022 | |
| Veneziani, Courtney | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Karim, Shahana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/30/2025 | |
| Veneziani, Courtney | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/26/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.22 hours per resident per day, below the Maryland average of 3.47.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Asbury Solomons Solomons, 6.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Solomons Nursing and Rehab Center Solomons, 6.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- St. Mary's Nursing Center Inc Leonardtown, 9.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Calvert County Nursing Ctr. Prince Frederick, 22.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Charlotte Hall Veterans Home Charlotte Hall, 22.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 33 citations
Maryland contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Maryland. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Maryland Department of Health, Office of Health Care Quality, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Maryland Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Maryland Department of Aging, 800-243-3425. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Maryland Health Care Commission, Maryland Quality Reporting, Nursing Homes, where Maryland publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Chesapeake Shores Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Chesapeake Shores Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Chesapeake Shores Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 9, 2026. The Maryland average is 17.
- Has Chesapeake Shores Nursing Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $47,254 in the last three years.
- Does Chesapeake Shores Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Chesapeake Shores Nursing Center?
- CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: LEXINGTON PARK MD OPCO LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.