Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Chesterfield

Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing

14701 Olive Blvd, Chesterfield, MO 63017 · St. Louis County · (314) 542-3300

130 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265414 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 1, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 13 health citations since August 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.76 of those hours.

44.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
3E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteSee the deficiency cited at LUGT12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication error after one resident with an allergy to penicillin (a class of antibiotics that are commonly used to treat bacterial infections) was ordered and administered Zosyn (a penicillin antibiotic used to treat infections) intravenously (IV, into the vein) to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) (Resident #503). The facility failed to get a detailed account of the resident's reaction to penicillin after it was reported and the resident's reactions were not documented in the medical record. The resident's family reported to facility staff the resident's reaction to penicillin was blood clots, he/she was highly allergic, and it could kill him/her. The nurse reported he/she was informed the resident's reaction was only blood clots. [...]
August 1, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased upon document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained in required infection control practices such as enhanced barrier protection (EBP) and/or other isolation precautions. The facility failed to have staff's competencies in relation to the infection control training. This failure placed all 80 residents at risk of infection. The lack of adequate training and evaluation of staff's competencies had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet and/or result in a lack of services provided by the facility.
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review job description, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one dietary freezer, and three of three nourishment room (Alpine Park, Canyon Creek, and Dakota) refrigerators had all food labeled, dated and was free of dirt and sticky shelves. This failure has the potential to create the environment for food-borne illnesses to occur throughout the population of 80 residents.
  3. F
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    F838 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive Facility-wide Assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations. The facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment included infection control services, such as surveillance and antibiotic use, as well as the facility employing an Infection Preventionist (IP) who would was responsible for overseeing the infection control program. The lack of an adequate facility assessment had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet and/or result in a lack of services provided by the facility to competently care for all 80 residents who resided at the facility. at the time of the survey.
  4. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three medication carts (Alpine unit and Canyon unit), and one of two treatment carts (Alpine unit) were locked and secured on three of three resident halls. This failure created a risk of medications being misappropriated or tampered with. Also, the facility failed to remove expired blood collection tubes from two of the three medication rooms (Alpine unit and Dakota Bluffs unit).
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, review of policies, interviews, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection prevention and control when providing wound care for Resident #35. The facility also failed to ensure one (Resident (R)144) of one resident with a diagnosis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) was placed in contact precautions. This had the potential for MRSA to spread to staff and to other residents. The facility failed to ensure R1 and R36 were placed in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for wounds and R294, R6, R35 for use of a catheter. This had the potential for the residents to develop multi-drug resist organisms. [...]
  6. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess one of one sampled resident (Resident (R) 37) for the safe self-administration of medications. This failure could potentially lead to medications being left by staff at the resident's bedside where other residents could access them.
  7. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident #38) from misappropriation of property when a staff member took the resident's wallet, and used his/her credit card to purchase take-out food and groceries. The census was 79. The administrator was notified on 7/24/24 of the past non-compliance. The facility had completed their investigation, interviewed staff and residents, notified the police and terminated Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A. The deficiency was corrected on 7/24/24. Review of the Abuse and Neglect (Suspected) Policy, revised March 2022, included the following: -Residents have the right to be free from any type of abuse, including verbal, physical, psychological, sexual, and emotional abuse and/or exploitation; [...]
  8. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication error after one resident with an allergy to penicillin (a class of antibiotics that are commonly used to treat bacterial infections) was ordered and administered Zosyn (a penicillin antibiotic used to treat infections) intravenously (IV, into the vein) to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) (Resident #503). The facility failed to get a detailed account of the resident's reaction to penicillin after it was reported and the resident's reactions were not documented in the medical record. The resident's family reported to facility staff the resident's reaction to penicillin was blood clots, he/she was highly allergic, and it could kill him/her. The nurse reported he/she was informed the resident's reaction was only blood clots. [...]
December 21, 2022Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to regularly offer/assist a resident with removal of facial hair to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 1 (Resident #100) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living.
August 22, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    F923 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 22, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the residents' bathroom exhaust ventilation system in proper working condition when all residents' bathrooms on the C hallway did not have functioning exhaust vents. This affected all residents on the C hallway. The facility had a capacity of 80 residents with a census of 67. 1. Observation on 8/21/19 beginning at 9:00 A.M., showed the exhaust ventilation system, in all residents' bathrooms of the C hallway, did not work when tested. During an interview on 8/21/19, at approximately 3:15 P.M., the maintenance supervisor said he did not know the residents' bathroom exhaust system did not work. He said the facility had recently had some work done and the ventilation was worked on at that time.
  2. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 22, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN, Form CMS-10055) for one sampled resident (Resident #5) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Record review of Resident #5's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review showed the following: - The resident's Medicare Part A skilled services episode had a start date of 3/16/19; - The resident's last covered day of Part A service was 3/28/19; - A SNF ABN, Form CMS-10055 was not provided to the resident because the resident was discharged from the facility and did not receive non-covered services. Spoke with POA (Power of Attorney) who was not concerned about charges but wanted to ensure patient was able to be in Medicaid bed and bill Medicaid for coverage. [...]
  3. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide written notification of transfer to the resident or the resident's representative for four residents (Residents #7, #20, #34, and #66) who transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 67. 1. Review of Resident #7's medical records, showed staff documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's transfer form, dated 7/27/2019, showed staff documented there was a medical reason for transfer because the resident fell a day ago and now showed symptoms of pain and swelling in his/her left hip. Review of the resident's nurses notes, dated 7/27/2019, showed the resident complained of pain in the left upper leg. When turning the resident to change his/her brief and when the resident stood for the transfer his/her pain level became intolerable. [...]

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 6 on August 1, 2024, 2 on December 21, 2022, 1 on August 22, 2019.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Install proper backup exit lighting.
    K 281 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · August 1, 2024 · Waiver
  5. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · August 1, 2024 · Waiver
  7. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · December 21, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · December 21, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Ensure proper storage of liquid oxygen.
    K 930 · August 22, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.723.433.86
Registered nurses1.760.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.203.013.42
Nurse aides1.84
Licensed practical nurses1.13
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.3%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover25.0%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.76 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.94 on weekdays and 4.20 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.10 in April to June 2025 to 4.72 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.721.764.944.20 0.0%0 of 9081
Oct to Dec 20256.032.376.375.14 0.0%0 of 9252
Jul to Sep 20255.401.845.684.67 0.0%0 of 9251
Apr to Jun 20255.101.765.354.49 0.0%0 of 9158
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.918.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.41.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.02.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.22.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.34.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.223.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
25.326.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.713.712.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

59.3% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 563 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 506 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 317 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

48.4% this home

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 124 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.8% this home

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 255 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.4% this home

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 255 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 124 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ST LUKES EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
St. Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian HospitalDirect ownership interestOrganization07/01/2024
Eaker, NormanManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2024
Edwards, JasonManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2024
Glotzbach, EdwardManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2024
Maritz, CynthiaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2024
Price, DavidManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2024
Snowden, JamesManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2024
Stegmann, DanielManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2024
Boesch, JeffreyCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Eaker, NormanCorporate directorIndividual09/15/2014
Franklin, SusanCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Ivie, GinaCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Maritz, CynthiaCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2017
Bagnall, AndrewCorporate officerIndividual08/15/2022
Edwards, JasonCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2021
Glotzbach, EdwardCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2016
Price, DavidCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2021
Snowden, JamesCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2021
Stegmann, DanielCorporate officerIndividual09/16/2013
Vitiello, JonathanCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2024
St. Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian HospitalOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/01/2024
Bagnall, AndrewOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2024
Boesch, JeffreyOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2024
Franklin, SusanOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2024
Ivie, GinaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2024
Vitiello, JonathanOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2024
Boesch, JeffreyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/28/2025
Franklin, SusanAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2024
Ivie, GinaAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2024: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2024: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  3. How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 1, 2024: "Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 1, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 1, 2024. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Surrey Place St. Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing?
CMS lists 29 owners and managers. Legal business name: ST LUKES EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection