Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Alice

The Premier SNF of Alice

800 a Coyote Trail, Alice, TX 78332 · Jim Wells County · (361) 666-3800

104 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2019

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676469 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.99 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.

92.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 24, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #16 and Resident #110) reviewed for pharmacy services in that: The facility failed to notice the narcotic sheet count for Acetaminophen-Codeine (narcotic pain medication) for Resident #110 did not match the remaining number of tablets in the blister pack through 12 administrations of the medication on various dates and times. The facility failed to notice the narcotic sheet count for Acetaminophen-Codeine for Resident #110 did not match the remaining number of tablets in the blister pack when it was set for destruction and locked in the DON's office. [...]
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation in that: The facility failed to ensure the juicer's dispenser nozzle was clean. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.
  3. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 3 (Resident #83) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #83's oxygen was administered on 04/23/26 as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could place residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles 1 of 6 medication carts (Med Aide Cart 1) reviewed for storage. The facility failed to keep Med Aide Cart 1 locked when MA I stepped into room [ROOM NUMBER] to measure a resident's blood pressure during med pass at 7:51 AM on 04/23/26. The failure could place residents in the facility at risk of drug diversion or misuse of medications leading to harm.
  5. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized for 1 (Resident #101) of 3 residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #101's facility death on [DATE], was accurately documented on his electronic medical record. This failure could place residents at risk of errors by staff when reading information in the clinical record that was inaccurate or incomplete.
November 29, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility failed to ensure on 11/27/2025, NA A failed to follow the facility's procedure when she observed Resident #1's left forearm with 3 brown and yellow skin irregularities. This failure could potentially negatively compromise a resident's well-being by prolonging warranted skin assessments and monitoring.
  2. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice, that were complete and accurately documented, for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for skin assessments. The facility failed to ensure on 11/17/2025 around 9:00 p.m., LVN A failed to accurately document the description of three discolored dots on Resident #1's left forearm as well as light brown/purple bruise on the top of Resident #1's right forearm. This failure could place residents at risk of having incomplete and accurate records and not receiving appropriate treatment and services.
August 14, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    F839 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable state laws for 1 of 5 CNAs (CNA A) reviewed for CNA certification. The facility failed to ensure CNA A's certification was current before allowing him to care for residents. CNA A worked in the facility providing resident care, on a full-time basis, with an expired certification during the period from [DATE] to [DATE]. This failure could place residents who received care from CNA A at a risk of decreased physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
February 5, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safely for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to properly label and date open, shelf stable food. The facility failed to dispose of expired shelf stable and refrigerated food. The facility failed to ensure items were stored properly in a refrigerator instead of on a pantry shelf. The facility failed to ensure the large containers of cooking oil were free from cracks or holes and not leaking on the floor. The facility failed to maintain and assure all chemicals in the kitchen area were labeled appropriately. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses, as well as place residents and staff at risk for falls and injuries.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs, for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #44) of 12 Residents reviewed for care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #5 to maintain the call light within reach of Resident #5. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's foley catheter ordered on 11/27/24 was care planned. This deficient practice could place residents at an increased risk of decline, and diminished quality of life.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #232) whose care plans were reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #232's care plan was revised to accurately reflect current urinary or foley catheter status. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate individualized care and services.
July 24, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan that included services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident highest practicable well being for one resident (R#1) of 4 residents reviewed for skin care. A focus item of wound care treatment for Resident #1 was not listed on the care plan for over a month (from June to July). This failure could place Resident #1 at risk for lack of appropriate interventions and goals for the resident to meet their highest practicable level of care. This failure could lead to infection, progression of the growth, missing Dermatology and other specialty appointments and observations, and the excision of the growth.
November 9, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 24 residents (Resident #20, Resident #49, Resident #36, Resident #40 and Resident #58), reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #20 (R#20) in that: -Care plan did not address R#20's dominant left sided weakness. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #49 (R#49) in that: -Care Plan was not updated in regard to his diet. [...]
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation in that: 1. The facility failed to label and date items in the nutrition rooms 2. The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the ice machine in the nutrition room 3. The facility failed to dry storage items sealed 4. The facility failed to keep personal items out of the prep area These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 24, 2026, 1 on February 5, 2025, 1 on November 9, 2023.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · April 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · February 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · November 9, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)2.993.393.86
Registered nurses0.350.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.552.983.42
Nurse aides1.79
Licensed practical nurses0.86
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)92.5%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover88.9%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.96 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.17 on weekdays and 2.55 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.19 in April to June 2025 to 2.99 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20262.990.353.172.55 0.0%0 of 9085
Oct to Dec 20253.000.313.162.57 0.0%2 of 9285
Jul to Sep 20253.240.323.412.81 0.0%0 of 9280
Apr to Jun 20253.190.333.352.81 0.0%0 of 9177
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.015.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.53.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.514.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.23.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.99.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
31.025.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.012.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.62.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.22.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Premier SNF of Alice's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

50.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 80 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

60.5% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

96.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Huggins, LindaW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/01/2022
Mak, DavidCorporate officerIndividual05/17/2021
Alice I Enterprises, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/01/2022
Blake, GaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2022
Blake, MalisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.55 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is The Premier SNF of Alice's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates The Premier SNF of Alice 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Premier SNF of Alice get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 24, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has The Premier SNF of Alice been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Premier SNF of Alice accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Premier SNF of Alice?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection