3558 Ridgewood Road, Fairlawn, OH 44333 · Summit County · (243) 466-8689
75 certified beds, about 61 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2020
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366479 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 12, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since June 2020, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.77 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.
58.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Foundations Health Solutions, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored. This affected nine residents (#12, #22, #25, #31, #33, #34, #40, #51, and #53). This had the potential to affected nine other residents residing on the memory care care who were independently mobile and had cognitive impairments. The facility census was 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents who were dependent on staff for toileting hygiene received timely assistance with incontinence care. This affected two (Residents #13 and #42) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37's care planned interventions were implemented and skin impairments were identified and treated timely. This affected one (Resident's #37) of four residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13's care planned interventions were implemented and failed to ensure Resident #13 had a comprehensive fall evaluation completed timely. This affected one (Resident #13) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents received timely and appropriate incontinence care. This affected one (Resident's #31) of four residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, pharmacy interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13's physician orders were followed and her medication was available for administration. This affected one (Resident #13) of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of a manufacturer insert, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). Three errors were observed in 27 opportunities resulting in a 11.1% error rate. This affected three (Resident #14, #17 and #31) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 62.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, pharmacist interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #101 was free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #101) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized and effective nutrition/hydration plan to prevent weight loss and dehydration for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for significant weight loss. The census was 65. Actual harm occurred on 10/01/25 when Resident #12, who had moderate cognitive impairment, was at moderate risk for malnutrition, required cues and assist with eating, and had a care-planned intervention to monitor and provide hydration as prescribed, was assessed to weigh 189.4 pounds representing a 17.3 pound or 8.3 percent (%) severe weight loss in two weeks. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided for #68's wound. This finding affected one resident (Residents #68) of four residents reviewed for wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained and wound care provided for Resident #28's pressure ulcer wounds. This finding affected one resident (Residents #28) of four residents reviewed for wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #12 received podiatry services in a timely manner. This finding affected one (Resident #12) of four resident records reviewed for auxiliary services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, the CASPER Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for the Second Quarter of 2025 (01/01/25 to 03/31/25), staffing schedules, posted staffing information, and staff interview, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary dumpster area. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required members of the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee participated at least quarterly as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe smoking environment. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for smoking. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of 26 reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) and corresponding investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to Resident #9. This affected one resident (#9) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified nine residents to be incontinent who resided on the [NAME] unit. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures during incontinence care and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained during medication administration through a gastrostomy tube. This affected one resident (#9) out of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate and timely care after a fall resulting in a fracture. This affected one resident (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for care. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, repeated falls, urinary retention, bradycardia, arthritis, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #19's physician's orders revealed an order dated 05/08/23 for hydrocodone - acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) (an opioid pain medication) three times daily. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, review of medical literature, policy review, and interview with the staff the facility failed to provide a physician ordered treatment for a resident's hormone condition. This affected one resident (#66) of three reviewed for care and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview with facility staff and staff from the local Summit County Health Department, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program to ensure recommendations by the local health department were implemented/completed to identify and prevent the spread of infection. This affected two residents (#9 and #75) and had the potential to affect 18 additional residents (#8, #12, #19, #21, #22, #25, #27, #28, #37, #39, #51, #54, #55, #56, #58, #59, #65, and #67) who resided on the facility [NAME] Wing. Findings Include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/19/22 with admitting diagnoses including paraplegia, chronic respiratory failure, resistance to antibiotics, lupus and chronic kidney disease. Record review revealed the resident was discharged on 11/01/23 and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of a self-reported incident and facility investigation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected two residents (Residents #25, and #38) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 69.
9 fire safety citations on file: 4 on August 12, 2025, 5 on May 4, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 29, 2025 | Payment Denial | 84 days from November 21, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.77 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.20 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.06 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.0% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 58.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.01 on weekdays and 3.20 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.52 in April to June 2025 to 3.77 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.77 | 0.61 | 4.01 | 3.20 | 2.0% | 2 of 90 | 61 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.62 | 0.48 | 3.82 | 3.11 | 2.0% | 4 of 92 | 67 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 0.53 | 3.91 | 3.15 | 2.0% | 2 of 92 | 65 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.52 | 0.49 | 3.74 | 2.98 | 2.2% | 6 of 91 | 65 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Timberland Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 49 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
2.7% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FHS FAIRLAWN INC. CMS links this home to Foundations Health Solutions, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colleran, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Colleran, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Krystowski, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2020 | |
| Foundations Health Solutions, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2020 | |
| Colleran, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Jackson, Charles | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/28/2025 | |
| Krystowski, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2020 | |
| Foundations Health Solutions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/03/2025 | |
| Colleran, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Jackson, Charles | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/28/2025 | |
| Krystowski, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2020 | |
| Ponnam, Harikrishna Choudary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.