210 Kansas Avenue, Goodland, KS 67735 · Sherman County · (785) 890-7517
45 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175361 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 22, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 44 health citations since August 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $49,937 in the last three years; the largest was $24,863, and the latest is dated June 3, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.51 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
38.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Grace Team Services, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 44 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions and with professional standards of food service safety by failing to document food temperatures for each meal, failing to date open food items, and failing to cover food items transported throughout the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate infection control practices when staff failed to wear gloves when administering nasal spray for Resident (R) 34 and did not clean the applicator before and after use. The facility failed to ensure R4's nasal cannula (NC - a thin hollow tube that assists in providing supplemental oxygen) was stored in a sanitary manner when not in use, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) equipment for R4, R26 and R12 was cleaned and stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. The facility failed to implement adequate hand hygiene during care for R12.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)39 was free from antipsychotics (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) without an appropriate indication of use or a physician-documented rationale, including risks versus benefits.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 8, who was at risk for falls and had wounds on her feet, had foot pedals on her wheelchair before staff propelled her out of her room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store the oxygen nasal cannula and nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) treatments in a sanitary manner for Resident (R) 43, who had been treated for respiratory infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals adequately for Resident (R) 43 when staff failed to date an insulin when it was opened.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 45 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed current licensure as required. This deficient practice placed all the residents residing in the facility at risk for not attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 45 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate administrative oversight when the facility failed to monitor and ensure all nurses practicing in the facility maintained active license as required to provide the residents residing in the facility with the care they needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice placed the residents residing in the facility at risk for lack of quality nursing care.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, placing all residents who reside at the facility at risk of decreased quality of care.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 44 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility's kitchens. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchens at risk for foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate staffing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote dignity for Resident (R) 22, when staff called R22 Honey multiple times instead of addressing her by her proper name. This placed the resident at risk for undignified care and services.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the correct CMS Form 10055, Skilled Nursing Facility [SNF] Advanced Beneficiary Notice [ABN] which included the estimated cost to continue services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for three residents: Resident (R) 1, R16, and R145. This placed all three residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled services.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for hospitalization. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a written notice for a facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R) 5, R11, and R1 or their representatives when they were transferred to the hospital. The facility also failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO-a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) of the discharges. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed care choices.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed the care plan to prevent accidents when staff failed to place Resident (R) 9's alarm (a device designed to monitor a patient's movements) underneath her when she was in bed per her plan of care resulting in a fall. This also placed R9 at risk for injuries from falls.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for Resident (R) 22 when staff did not provide her oxygen during the breakfast meal and failed to store the oxygen tubing and cannula (a medical device that delivers supplemental oxygen to patients through their nose) in a sanitary manner when not in use. This placed R22 at risk for respiratory complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 22, who had dementia and behaviors. This placed R22 at risk for abuse and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance when dietary staff failed to prepare all the food items on the noon menu while preparing Resident (R) 20 and R22's pureed diet. This placed the residents at risk for impaired nutrition.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for immunizations to include pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer, or obtain an informed declination or a physician-documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination to Resident (R) 9 per the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This placed the resident at risk for pneumococcal infection and related complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 40 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from accidents when staff failed to safely operate a mechanical lift resulting in a fall with injury. On 05/22/24 at approximately 05:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M prepared R1 for a mechanical lift transfer (by use of a ceiling lift) from her bed to her wheelchair. CNA M failed to ensure the lift sling harness loops were attached to the mechanical lift correctly. During the transfer, R1 fell out of the lift sling to the floor and required emergency transfer and evaluation. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for falls and accidents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1's safety during a transfer when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M used the ceiling-mounted full body lift to transfer R1 from her bed to her wheelchair. During the transfer, R1 slid out of the lift sling onto the floor. As a result, R1 sustained a left femoral (thigh bone) fracture and a left fibular (one of the two bones in the lower leg) fracture. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for medication errors. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system) for Resident (R) 2 was available for administration. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for a worsening UTI and health complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for medications. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 2's psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication used off-label use for insomnia (inability to sleep) after a trial increase. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for inadequate oversight, lack of physician involvement, and ineffective dosing for Trazodone.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for pain. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident (R) 1 respiratory needs and equipment. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for respiratory well-being due to uncommunicated care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for pain. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to provide respiratory care with the Trilogy non-invasive ventilator (an all-in-one ventilation device capable of delivering both invasive and non-invasive ventilation that can be more finely calibrated and adjusted to meet individual needs) to Resident (R) 1. The facility did not have orders from the primary care physician regarding how to run the Trilogy non-invasive ventilator, what settings the non-invasive ventilator needed to be set at, or how and when to clean the Trilogy non-invasive ventilator. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for respiratory failure.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for pain. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 received her pain medication as ordered to help alleviate her pain. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk of pain and emotional distress from being in pain.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for medication errors. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 was free from medication errors. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk of medical complications from not receiving her medications as they were ordered by her physician.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify fall risk and initiate fall interventions for Resident (R) 1 on 11/08/23 when he admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of frequent falls. On 11/09/23 at 10:10 PM staff found R1 in his room on the floor. R1 complained of severe pain in his back and was transported to the local hospital where he was diagnosed with fourth and fifth rib fractures on his right side. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for falls, injury, and pain.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement preventative interventions for Resident (R)23 who had a current pressure area on her buttocks and had a decline in health. As a result, R23 developed an unstageable (pressure injury where tissue loss and actual depth of the ulcer is completely obscured) pressure ulcer on her left heel. The facility further failed to ensure the resident received interventions, which included offloading pressure to the resident's heels to promote healing and prevent further pressure injuries. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with six reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a root cause analysis to identify causative factors and failed to implement meaningful, resident centered interventions for Resident (R) 31, who subsequently fell and sustained a nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture (broken) of the right femur. The facility failed to investigate two falls for R31 and failed to follow R31's plan of care, which resulted in a fall. The facility also failed to complete a root cause analysis to identify causative factors and failed to implement meaningful, resident centered interventions for R34. The facility failed to prevent R27 from exiting the facility in 20-degree weather. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and injury.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week, placing all the residents who resided at the facility at risk of lack of assessments and inappropriate care.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with meaningful resident centered interventions for falls for Resident (R) 31, and R34. The failed to revise the care plan related to mood for R23 and R2. This placed the resident's at risk for inappropriate care due to uncommunicated care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare, store, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of three households. The facility staff failed to change gloves after touching their clothing, doors, papers, and other objects, and touched pancakes with the same contaminated gloves. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illness in two of three households.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of Resident (R) 2's suicidal ideations, R7's elopement ( when a resident exits the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) in winter weather, R13's lack of bowel movements and R23's verbalizations of wanting to die. This placed the residents at risk for delayed treatment due to lack of physician involvement.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify Resident (R)27's leaving the facility without the knowledge of staff in the middle of the night as an allegation of neglect and report to the state agency as required. This placed R27 at risk for unidentified and/or ongoing neglect.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate Resident (R)27's incident of tweezers in her throat as well as R27 exiting the facility without staff awareness during winter weather. This failure placed R27 at risk for ongoing neglect and unidentified care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) used tweezers to remove a blackhead on Resident (R)19's back without instruction or supervision from a licensed nurse, and the facility further failed to provide a dressing change to R31's wrist when sanguineous drainage (leakage of fresh blood) seeped through the dressing. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate skin care and related complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to monitor and provide pain medication to Resident (R)16, who had severe pain in her shoulder after an incident with the sit to stand lift. This placed the resident at risk for prolonged pain.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial (interrelation of social factors and individual thought and behavior) well-being when staff failed to provide Resident (R)2 with mental health services when reporting suicidal ideations. This placed R2 residents at risk for unmet mental health care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of two sampled residents, Resident (R) 2 who had reported suicidal ideations and lacked social service involvement, and R23 who reported wanting to die and social services was not aware of reported concern. This placed the residents at risk for further decline of their emotional and mental well-being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide physician ordered medications for lack of bowel movements, and failed to contact the physician for one resident, Resident (R) 13, who had a history of constipation. This placed the resident at risk for impaction. Findings inlcuded: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R13 documented diagnoses of constipation (difficulty passing stool), chronic pain (pain that carries on for longer than 12 weeks despite medication or treatment), major depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), hypertension (high blood pressure), and iron deficiency (too little iron in the body). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, when dietary staff failed to follow a recipe while preparing a pureed (texture-modified diet in which all food to have a soft, pudding like consistency) diet for one resident in the Cottonwood Household and failed to prepare foods by methods that conserve palatable and nutritive value by serving beef steak at incorrect temperature and the nutritive value by omitting a vegetable serving to two residents who received pureed diets in the Sunflower Household. This placed the resident's at risk for unmet dietary needs and at risk of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. This placed the residents who used the lift at risk for preventable accidents.
29 fire safety citations on file: 6 on July 22, 2026, 10 on August 29, 2024, 13 on August 31, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 3, 2024 | Fine | $13,039 |
| March 4, 2024 | Fine | $12,035 |
| November 28, 2023 | Fine | $24,863 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.51 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.35 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.76 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.28 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.6% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.12 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.58 on weekdays and 4.35 on weekends, 5% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.56 in April to June 2025 to 4.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.51 | 0.48 | 4.58 | 4.35 | 11.4% | 0 of 90 | 44 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.78 | 0.37 | 4.86 | 4.55 | 10.4% | 1 of 92 | 42 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.52 | 0.26 | 4.59 | 4.32 | 9.6% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.56 | 0.25 | 4.60 | 4.46 | 16.4% | 0 of 91 | 42 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.2 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.6 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.6 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.7 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.4 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Topside Manor Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (29.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
29.4% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
13.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
7.1% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
4.1% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: TOPSIDE MANOR INC. CMS links this home to Grace Team Services, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topside Manor Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/20/2019 |
| Drennan, Jacque | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| House, Gennifer | Corporate director | Individual | 03/20/2019 | |
| Mersch, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 03/20/2019 | |
| Rasure, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 03/20/2019 | |
| Schilling, Ron | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Bland & Associates, P.C. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2020 | |
| Grace Team LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2019 | |
| Gt Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2019 | |
| Mednow Staffing, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Openwork Health LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Topside Manor Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/20/2019 | |
| Daise, Travis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Grace, Ryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2019 | |
| Huebert, Eric | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2019 | |
| McTague, Daphne | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Bland & Associates, P.C. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/12/2025 | |
| County of Sherman | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/2022 | |
| Grace Team LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/04/2025 | |
| Gt Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/06/2025 | |
| Mednow Staffing, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/06/2025 | |
| Openwork Health LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/06/2025 | |
| Reliant Rehabilitation Holdings Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/06/2025 | |
| Daise, Travis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Grace, Ryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2019 | |
| Huebert, Eric | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2019 | |
| McTague, Daphne | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/12/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.