Trinity Community
3218 Indian Ripple Road, Beavercreek, OH 45440 · Greene County · (937) 426-8481
95 certified beds, about 84 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365777 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 3, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since February 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,932 in the last three years; the largest was $9,932, and the latest is dated April 18, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.
44.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to United Church Homes, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1102/19
1004/22
104/24
604/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
23D
2E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 3, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 79 residents in the facility. The facility identified two residents (21 and #137) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 81.
- F Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure trash cans in the kitchen food preparation areas were covered. This had the potential to affect 79 residents in the facility. The facility identified two residents (#21 and #137) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 81.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer residents for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two services after a significant mental health change. This affected one (56) of the six residents reviewed for PASARR. The census was 81.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission. This affected three (#29, #54, and #139) of the 12 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 81.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were monitored and recorded. This affected one (#77) of the seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 81.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate records for supplemental orders. This had the potential to affect one (77) of the seven residents reviewed for resident orders. The census was 81. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77, revealed an admission date of 01/16/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, and Coronavirus (COVID-19). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #77 had severe cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of physician orders for Resident #77 dated 01/18/25, revealed the resident was ordered Ensure (supplement) with meals. [...]
April 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, facility protocol review, and hospital record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards when they failed to hold blood pressure medications and notify the doctor of a low blood pressure for Resident #77. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #77 was hospitalized with diagnoses of hypotension, acute kidney injury, and altered mental status. Resident #77 had an elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) level of 110 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl), and elevated creatinine level of 3.22 mg/dl, and a hospital emergency room triage blood pressure of 80/36 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). This affected one (Resident #77) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 79.
April 25, 2022Standard inspection · 10 citations
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to offer residents influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. This affected five residents (#17, #29, #78, #330, and #339) of seven residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 79.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided dignity when a resident was called a feed. This affected one resident (#25) of 18 residents reviewed. The facility identified 17 residents who were dependent for eating. The facility census was 79.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an Advanced Directive was signed by the physician. This affected one resident (#67) of one resident reviewed for Advanced Directives of 18 sampled. The facility identified 33 residents who had an Advanced Directive. The facility census was 79.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated. This affected two residents (#18 and #46) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 79.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the hospice agreement the facility failed to ensure residents who received hospice had current detailed and completed hospice medical records. This affected one resident (#25) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 79.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, observation, and policy review the facility failed to perform incontinence care per the facility policy/procedure. This affected two residents (#18 and #50) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 79.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, observation and policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen per orders and failed to properly store oxygen tubing/masks. This affected three residents (#25, #35 and #50) of 10 residents who used oxygen in the facility. The facility census was 79.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, observation, review of the pharmacy recommendations, review of an email correspondence and policy review the facility failed to timely address pharmacy recommendations. This affected two residents (#35 and #34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 79.
- D Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, observation and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided physician ordered adaptive devices for eating. This affected two residents (#25 and #58) two residents reviewed for devices of 18 residents reviewed. The facility census was 79.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, observations, and policy review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before and after care, failed to wear gloves when handling soiled linen, failed to properly dispose of soiled linens and a soiled adult brief. This affected three residents (#25, #18, and #50) of 18 residents sampled. In addition, the facility failed to ensure isolation precautions were in place for a resident who required contact precaution. This affected one resident (#50) of two residents reviewed for isolation precautions. The facility census was 79.
February 28, 2019Standard inspection · 11 citations
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review. the facility failed to timely revise the plan of care for five residents (#48, #49, #59, #61, and #433) of 18 care plans reviewed. The facility census was 82.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was correct regarding the dental status for one resident (#48) of one reviewed for dental status. The facility census was 82.
- D Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical review, open medical record review, staff interview, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely complete MDS assessments within the required time frame. This affected two residents (#5 and #3) of 20 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy and timeliness of assessments. The facility census was 82.
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely submit MDS assessments within the required time frame. This affected one resident (#3) out of six residents reviewed for MDS timeliness of submission. The facility census was 82.
- D Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) coordination of assessments and failed to ensure a RN signed and certified the MDS's were complete. This affected two residents ( #3 and #48) of six residents reviewed for MDS accuracy and RN signature. The facility census was 82.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview, resident interview, and review of assignment sheets, the facility failed to timely implement physician orders. This affected one resident (#75) of 21 resident reviewed for implementing physician orders. The facility census was 82.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate a resident's fall. This affected one resident (#59) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 82.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ongoing dialysis communication between the dialysis and the facility was maintained for one resident (#27) of one reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 82.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor a resident's behaviors who was taking an anti-psychotic medication. This affected one resident (#50) of seven reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (#63)ordered as needed anti-anxiety medication was reviewed every 14 days. The facility further failed to ensure a resident (#59) who was ordered an anti-psychotic medication had an appropriate diagnoses for the use of the medication. This affected two residents (#63 and #59) of seven reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82.
- D Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure lab test ordered were completed as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#433) of one resident reviewed for lab orders. The facility census was 82.
Fire safety inspections
16 fire safety citations on file: 7 on April 3, 2025, 5 on April 25, 2022, 4 on February 28, 2019.
Every fire safety citation16 citations
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- E Use approved construction type or materials.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 18, 2024 | Fine | $9,932 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.92 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.58 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.40 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.05 on weekdays and 3.58 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.01 in April to June 2025 to 3.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.92 | 0.49 | 4.05 | 3.58 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 84 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.62 | 0.48 | 3.74 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.23 | 0.48 | 4.39 | 3.82 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 86 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.01 | 0.48 | 4.11 | 3.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 82 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.0 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.9 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: UNITED CHURCH HOMES, INC.. CMS links this home to United Church Homes, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Church Homes, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2000 |
| Bailey, Peter | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Bates, Trevor | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2017 | |
| Benjamin, Pamela | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Black, Geoffrey | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2016 | |
| D'agostino, Joanna | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Graham, George | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Guess, James | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Hawes-Saunders, Ro Nita | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Henry, James | Corporate director | Individual | 12/31/2014 | |
| James, Jill | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Long-Higgins, David | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Sandman, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Ulrich, Karl | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2016 | |
| Williams, Stephanie | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2014 | |
| Winfrey, Lapearl | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2020 | |
| Naderhoff, Judith | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Young, Kenneth | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| United Church Homes, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2000 | |
| Bills, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/26/2022 | |
| Bollinger, Nathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2023 | |
| Brown, Dale | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/12/2012 | |
| Brubaker, Tamra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/19/2022 | |
| Durbin, Debra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Eusanio, Vincent | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Farrell, Laura | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/08/1994 | |
| Faulkner, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Hurwitz, Gloria | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/07/2013 | |
| Kelley, Megan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Klenzman, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Long-Higgins, Elizabeth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/02/2022 | |
| Maghes, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/24/2025 | |
| Miller, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/04/2017 | |
| Mullikin, Judy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/19/1986 | |
| Naderhoff, Judith | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Slutz, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Spitznagel, Teresa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2022 | |
| Stacey, Amanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Szewczyk, Melody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/22/1986 | |
| Thorp-Sweitzer, Kimberly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/1994 | |
| Tillman, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/21/2020 | |
| Vaughan, Corrye | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/20/2004 | |
| Vaughn, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/06/2006 | |
| Venkatesh, Latha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/22/2019 | |
| Warren, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Young, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2025 | |
| United Church Homes, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2000 | |
| Farrell, Laura | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/07/2026 | |
| Venkatesh, Latha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on April 3, 2025: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on April 3, 2025: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 3, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 25, 2022: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Village at the Greene Dayton, 2.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 59 citations
- Beavercreek Post Acute Dayton, 3.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Oak Creek Terrace Inc Kettering, 4.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Bellbrook Health and Rehab Bellbrook, 4.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Kettering Heights Post Acute Kettering, 4.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Overbrook Landing Health and Rehabiliation Xenia, 5.4 mi · not rated · 0 citations
- The Laurels of Kettering Kettering, 5.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 57 citations
- Bethany Village Dayton, 6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Trinity Community's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Trinity Community 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Trinity Community get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 3, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Trinity Community been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,932 in the last three years.
- Does Trinity Community accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Trinity Community?
- CMS lists 49 owners and managers, and links the home to United Church Homes. Legal business name: UNITED CHURCH HOMES, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.