Find a nursing home

Home / North Dakota / Grand Forks

Valley Senior Living on Columbia

2900 14th Ave S, Grand Forks, ND 58201 · Grand Forks County · (701) 787-7900

196 certified beds, about 187 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355067 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 19, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 3 fines totaling $31,594 in the last three years; the largest was $13,104, and the latest is dated August 6, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.32 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.30 of those hours.

32.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
0E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 26, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on -review of a facility reported incident (FRI), record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) who experienced unwanted sexual contact from another resident (Resident #1). Failure to protect residents from sexual abuse places all residents at risk for psychosocial harm and mental and emotional distress.
June 19, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly utilize assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #150) who fell during a staff assisted transfer. Failure to utilize the gait belt resulted in Resident #150's fall/fracture and placed all residents transferred with a gait belt at risk for injury. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.19.1), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #36). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 3 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #30, #153, and #275) observed during cares/wound care. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), perineal care, catheter cares, dressing changes, and hand hygiene, has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
May 16, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024
    Inspectors wrote2. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision necessary to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #165) who required one to one supervision with meals. Failure to stay with the resident while eating as care planned places the resident at risk for choking.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 5 sampled residents on oxygen (Resident #32 and #47). Failure to develop a comprehensive care plan limited staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure the continuity of care.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #165) with prevalon boots (used for pressure relief) as ordered by the provider. Failure to apply the pressure relief boots as ordered may result in the development/worsening of pressure ulcers.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #98) who required staff assistance with toileting. Failure to provide toileting may result in a loss of dignity and placed residents at risk for skin breakdown, poor grooming/hygiene, decreased self-esteem, urinary tract infections, and risk for fall and/or injuries.
  5. D
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    F849 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records contained the hospice election form for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #79) receiving hospice services. Failure to obtain this document limits staff's ability to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the hospice.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for (2 of 21) sampled residents (Resident #49, and #154) and one supplemental resident (Resident #56) observed during personal cares. Failure to follow infection control standards related to hand hygiene and emptying of a urinary bag has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility and could transmit those infections to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene occurred on 05/15/24. This policy, revised in May 2023, stated, . all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures . 2. Before and after direct contact with residents. Review of the facility skills validation titled Emptying Urinary Drainage Bag occurred in 05/15/24. [...]
June 8, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for removal of a foley catheter for 1 of 7 sampled residents with a catheter (Resident #147). Failure to follow physician orders for the removal of the foley catheter and to attempt voiding trials may result in an increased risk of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and decreased quality of life. Findings Include: The facility failed to provide a copy of their policy addressing physician orders. During an interview on 06/06/23 at 03:50 p.m., Resident (#147) complained of having a catheter and stated, I want it out. Physician orders on 04/27/2023 at 7:23 a.m., stated, Attempt voiding trial with next scheduled catheter change (5-16-2023). Remove catheter in the morning. Leave out for 4 hours and push fluids. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #56) observed during insulin administration. Failure to obtain an accurate label for an insulin pen following an order change may result in residents receiving too much/little insulin and/or having a negative reaction.
  3. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to store dietary supplements under safe and sanitary conditions in 2 of 5 medication carts (Riverside Long Hall and [NAME] Short Hall) observed. Failure to remove scoops in dietary supplements may result in contamination of supplements or spread of infection to residents.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
August 6, 2026Fine $11,482
June 19, 2025Fine $7,008
May 16, 2024Fine $13,104

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.324.423.86
Registered nurses1.300.930.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.233.803.42
Nurse aides3.39
Licensed practical nurses0.62
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)32.6%48.8%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover11.9%40.3%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.65 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.76 on weekdays and 4.23 on weekends, 27% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.27 in April to June 2025 to 5.32 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.321.305.764.23 0.0%0 of 90187
Oct to Dec 20255.351.355.764.27 0.0%0 of 92186
Jul to Sep 20255.401.355.854.24 0.0%0 of 92185
Apr to Jun 20255.271.345.764.03 0.0%0 of 91184
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Dakota, Jan to Mar 20264.570.924.813.9611.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for North Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
North Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.03$17.51 to $23.066,840
LPNs and LVNs$29.95$28.03 to $31.261,920
Registered nurses$38.81$33.47 to $44.7511,340
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Valley Senior Living on Columbia. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.119.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.01.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.02.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.65.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.31.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.617.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.24.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.422.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.019.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.311.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.91.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.91.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Valley Senior Living on Columbia's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (44.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

44.1% this home

Worse than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · North Dakota: 0 better, 21 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 336 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.7% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · North Dakota: 2 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 410 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · North Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 221 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

47.4% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota50.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 192 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.2% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 241 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.9% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota2.9% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 241 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: North Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: VALLEY HOMES AND SERVICES.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Valley Senior LivingDirect ownership interestOrganization11/12/1997
Berge, ScottManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/25/2023
Brown, MichaelManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/28/2020
Colenso, ThomasManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/30/2024
Molmen, DavidManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/23/2019
Moore, PatrickManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/25/2017
Reed, MargaretManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/25/2017
Svendson, CarolManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/25/2023
Thompson, DwightManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/26/2022
Berge, ScottCorporate directorIndividual09/25/2023
Brown, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual09/28/2020
Colenso, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual09/30/2024
Molmen, DavidCorporate directorIndividual09/23/2019
Moore, PatrickCorporate directorIndividual09/25/2017
Reed, MargaretCorporate directorIndividual09/25/2017
Rydland, GarthCorporate directorIndividual02/11/2014
Svendson, CarolCorporate directorIndividual09/25/2023
Thompson, DwightCorporate directorIndividual09/26/2022
Molmen, DavidCorporate officerIndividual09/26/2022
Reed, MargaretCorporate officerIndividual09/23/2019
Rydland, GarthCorporate officerIndividual02/11/2014
Svendson, CarolCorporate officerIndividual09/25/2023
Thompson, DwightCorporate officerIndividual09/25/2023
Altru Health SystemOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/01/1994
Valley Senior LivingOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/12/1997
Anderson, MeganOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/31/2014
Baumgarten, JessicaOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/06/2015
Berge, ScottOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/25/2023
Bott, LorileeOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/29/2004
Brown, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/28/2020
Colenso, ThomasOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/30/2024
Edwards, AdamOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/05/2021
Hathaway, SonjaOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/19/2023
Henderson, ChristopherOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/25/2018
Hoeger, NannetteOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/03/2023
Lien, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/17/2005
Litsey, JoeOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/02/2023
Molmen, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/23/2019
Moore, PatrickOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/25/2017
Reed, MargaretOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/25/2017
Rerick, LeeOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/10/2021
Rydland, GarthOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/11/2014
Safranski, TinaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Stethem, RenitaOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/13/2013
Svendson, CarolOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/25/2023
Thompson, DwightOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/26/2022
Altru Health SystemAdp of the SNFOrganization05/21/2025
Valley Senior LivingAdp of the SNFOrganization04/07/2025
Anderson, MeganAdp of the SNFIndividual03/31/2014
Baumgarten, JessicaAdp of the SNFIndividual12/06/2015
Berge, ScottAdp of the SNFIndividual09/25/2023
Bott, LorileeAdp of the SNFIndividual09/29/2004
Brown, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual09/28/2020
Colenso, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual09/30/2024
Edwards, AdamAdp of the SNFIndividual09/05/2021
Hathaway, SonjaAdp of the SNFIndividual02/19/2023
Henderson, ChristopherAdp of the SNFIndividual06/25/2018
Hoeger, NannetteAdp of the SNFIndividual09/03/2023
Lien, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual07/17/2005
Litsey, JoeAdp of the SNFIndividual06/02/2023
Molmen, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual09/23/2019
Moore, PatrickAdp of the SNFIndividual09/25/2017
Reed, MargaretAdp of the SNFIndividual09/25/2017
Rerick, LeeAdp of the SNFIndividual11/10/2021
Rydland, GarthAdp of the SNFIndividual02/11/2014
Safranski, TinaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Stethem, RenitaAdp of the SNFIndividual10/13/2013
Svendson, CarolAdp of the SNFIndividual09/25/2023
Thompson, DwightAdp of the SNFIndividual09/26/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on November 26, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."

Other nursing homes nearby

North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Valley Senior Living on Columbia's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Valley Senior Living on Columbia 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Valley Senior Living on Columbia get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 19, 2025. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
Has Valley Senior Living on Columbia been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 3 fines totaling $31,594 in the last three years.
Does Valley Senior Living on Columbia accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Valley Senior Living on Columbia?
CMS lists 69 owners and managers. Legal business name: VALLEY HOMES AND SERVICES.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection