Find a nursing home

Home / North Carolina / King

Village Care of King

440 Ingram Road, King, NC 27021 · Stokes County · (336) 983-4900

96 certified beds, about 89 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345381 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).

Of 15 health citations since May 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 3 fines totaling $110,113 in the last three years; the largest was $49,544, and the latest is dated January 17, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.

77.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).

CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
3J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
0E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 8, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    F865 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and Administrator interview, the facility failed to maintain and produce documented evidence of a comprehensive and ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program that demonstrated systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events; and the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities for calendar year 2025. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 94 of 94 facility residents.
  2. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident with a serious mental health disorder for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #96).
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans addressing behaviors and post-traumatic stress disorder (Resident #96) and hospice care (Resident #13) for 2 of 19 residents reviewed.
July 11, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff, family member, Resident, Physician Assistant, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision for Resident #1 who had a diagnosis of dementia, an addiction to cigarettes, and required supervision/touching assistance for walking 10 feet. Resident #1 left the facility unnoticed and unattended, walking along the side of a 35 mile an hour two-lane road to obtain cigarettes at a nearby store. Resident #1 was located approximately 1/2 mile away from the facility standing in a grassy field near the side of the road. The walking route to where the resident was located included an upward sloping sidewalk, a downward sloping sidewalk with a pond to the left, and then a dirt path that ended at the edge of the grassy field. [...]
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a severely cognitively impaired resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse. During care on 6/26/2025 Nursing Assistant (NA) #5 held the resident's arms down on the bed, told him to shut up, and put her gloved hand over Resident #4's mouth while assisting with incontinence care. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #4).
  3. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure in the area of reporting when Nursing Assistant (NA) #6 failed to immediately report she had observed NA #5 physically and verbally abuse Resident #4 when NA #5 held the resident's arms down on the bed, told him to shut up and put her gloved hand over Resident #4's mouth while providing incontinence care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #4).
January 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #1). On 10/22/24 Resident #1 was lifted manually by Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 from the shower chair to the bed, causing Resident #1 right leg to hit the shower chair, get caught in between the shower chair and the bed, causing severe pain and swelling. An x-ray completed on 10/24/24 confirmed Resident #1 sustained an acute distal tibia/fibula (the two long bones in the lower leg) fracture.
  2. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident, staff, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. On 10/22/24 Resident #1 was lifted manually by Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 from the shower chair to the bed, causing Resident #1's right leg to hit the shower chair, get caught in between the shower chair and the bed, causing severe pain and swelling. On 10/22/24 Nurse #1, was notified by NA #1 that Resident #1 complained of pain. Nurse #1 did not notify the physician. On 10/22/24, Nurse #2, was informed by Resident #1 of her right leg hurting, and did not notify the physician. On 10/23/24, Nurse #3, who worked from 11:00 pm (10/22/24) to 7:00 am (10/23/24), was notified by NA (Unknown) that resident complained of pain, and did not notify the physician. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident, staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to complete and document ongoing comprehensive assessments after Resident #1 reported leg pain which delayed medical treatment and interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessments. On 10/22/24 Resident #1 was lifted manually by Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 from the shower chair to the bed, causing Resident #1 right leg to hit the shower chair, get caught in between the shower chair and the bed, causing pain and swelling. On 10/22/24, between 11:00 am and 11:30 am, Nurse #1 was notified by NA #1 that Resident #1 complained of pain and Nurse #1 did not complete an assessment. Nurse #2 was assigned to Resident #1 on 10/22/24 from 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm and did not complete a comprehensive assessment and only documented she did not observe any bruising or open area. [...]
October 10, 2024Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 23, 2024Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. J
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    F660 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident, ombudsman, family, friend, staff, the Home Health Nurse, and Adult Protective Services Social Workers interviews the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1, by not assessing the home environment which was described as not safe by the resident and family, discharging the resident to home where the resident did not have a functional phone to contact people or 911 in the event of an emergency and arranging for individuals who would be able to obtain the resident's prescription medications and assist with basic Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) such as transfer from the couch to a wheelchair, toileting, peri-care, meal preparation, and bathing. [...]
  2. D
    Provide information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
    F579 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on resident and family member interviewa, staff interviews and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with information regarding application for Medicaid for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge (Resident #1).
  3. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff and family member interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident a notification of discharge and did not send a copy of the notice to the Ombudsman for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge.
  4. D
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for planned discharge to the community.
January 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview of staff, physician, resident, the facility failed to protect Resident #1 from rolling out of bed during the provision of personal care. Resident #1 fell from her bed to the floor. Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room and was diagnosed with a distal femur fracture (fractures of the thighbone that occur just above the knee joint) of both legs. The fractures resulted in hospitalization, treatment with Heparin (blood thinner) to prevent blood clots in the lower legs and Fentanyl (a controlled substance used to treat severe pain) for pain. The resident had to wear knee braces to both legs for stability until healed which can cause skin breakdown and significantly limit her ability to move/transfer during care, dialysis, or simple shifting herself in the bed. This deficient practice affected one of two sampled residents (Resident #1).
May 11, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to provide a CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) prior to discharge from Medicare part A services to one of three residents (Resident #77) reviewed for SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review.

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 11, 2025, 2 on October 10, 2024, 3 on May 11, 2023.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. D
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · July 11, 2025 · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
  2. D
    Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
    K 911 · October 10, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · October 10, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · May 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
January 17, 2025Fine $44,117
March 23, 2024Fine $49,544
January 19, 2024Fine $16,452

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth CarolinaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.583.853.86
Registered nurses0.380.620.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.183.423.42
Nurse aides2.06
Licensed practical nurses1.14
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)77.8%49.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover71.4%45.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.74 on weekdays and 3.18 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 26.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.85 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.580.383.743.18 26.6%0 of 9089
Oct to Dec 20253.530.333.683.14 24.0%1 of 9290
Jul to Sep 20253.690.313.863.24 26.5%1 of 9292
Apr to Jun 20253.850.274.033.39 36.1%0 of 9189
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Carolina, Jan to Mar 20263.650.533.823.258.0%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for North Carolina

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
North Carolina, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.49$17.28 to $21.0864,010
LPNs and LVNs$30.42$28.50 to $33.5118,010
Registered nurses$40.56$37.87 to $49.06111,120
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Village Care of King. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth CarolinaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.615.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.32.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.83.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
35.918.314.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.65.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.114.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.122.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.512.912.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Village Care of King's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

54.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 117 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 94 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

49.0% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 73 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 73 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: VILLAGE CARE OF KING LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Wwbv Holdings LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%09/30/2019
Musick, AmyW-2 managing employeeIndividual10/25/2021
Volpe, BenjaminCorporate directorIndividual03/01/2019
Weisberg, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual03/01/2019
Nicoluzakis, GregoryCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2019
Volpe, BenjaminCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2019
Weisberg, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2019
Saber Governance LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/01/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 11, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 17, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 11, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.18 hours per resident per day, below the North Carolina average of 3.42.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

North Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Village Care of King's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Village Care of King 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Village Care of King get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 8, 2026. The North Carolina average is 4.7.
Has Village Care of King been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 3 fines totaling $110,113 in the last three years.
Does Village Care of King accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Village Care of King?
CMS lists 8 owners and managers, and links the home to Saber Healthcare Group. Legal business name: VILLAGE CARE OF KING LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection