09 876 County Rd 16, Bryan, OH 43506 · Williams County · (419) 636-4508
71 certified beds, about 65 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366149 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 17 health citations since October 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.10 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
30.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of the facility's water management program, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and review of facility policy, the facility failed to meet the requirements for a Legionella water management program. This had the potential to affect all residents. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during insulin administration. This affected one resident (#18) for administration of insulin. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility submitted self-reported incidents (SRI), staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure thorough investigations were completed. This affected six (#30, #31, #43, #45, #52, and #56) of six residents reviewed for thorough facility investigations. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure non-pasteurized eggs were cooked appropriately. This affected three (#11, #23, and #40) residents who received soft cooked eggs from the kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene while providing meal assistance. This affected two (#26 and #49) residents observed during meal service. The facility identified five additional residents (#10, #16, #29, #41, and #58) who required assistance during meals. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible to residents. This affected one (#52) of one resident reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy curtains were maintained in good repair. This affected two residents (#3 and #29) of two residents reviewed for privacy curtains. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This affected one (#47) of one resident reviewed for medication storage. The facility identified five (#22, #25, #33, #55, and #56) additional residents who were cognitively impaired and independently mobility residing on the 800-Hall. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility bowel protocol, the facility failed to implement bowel interventions. This affected two (#24 and #52) of two residents reviewed for bowel protocol. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's staff vaccination COVID-19 log, staff interview, review of the facility's policy, and review of the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandum QSO-23-02-ALL, the facility failed to ensure staff were COVID-19 vaccinated, had an approved exemption, or had been identified as appropriate for a temporary delay per Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance. The vaccination rate for the facility was calculated at 74%. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents currently residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of the dishwasher temperature log, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine maintained the appropriate temperature for effective sanitation. This had the potential to affect 64 residents who resided in the facility and received food from the kitchen. Resident #41 received no food by mouth and thus no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, review of the Weather Channel's weather report, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided consistent individualized activities of their choice to meet their interests and psychosocial needs. This affected one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to report an allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #35) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, family interview, medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives were properly notified of scheduled care conference meetings so they had the opportunity to attend. This affected one (Resident #59) of 19 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 65. Findings Include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/24/22. Diagnoses included history of COVID-19, cognitive communication deficit, generalized anxiety disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating Resident #59 was moderately cognitively impaired. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADL) received adequate and timely assistance with grooming. This affected two (Resident #19 and #48) of two residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility identified all 65 residents required assistance from staff with bathing and 64 residents required assistance from staff with dressing. The facility census was 65.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, resident interview, visitor interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperatures in the main dining room. This affected seven residents (#13, #30, #47, #6, #272, #59, and #51), as well as a visitor eating lunch in the main dining room. The facility identified 22 residents who were eating lunch in the main dining room. The facility census was 70.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the facility self reported incident (SRI), resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when an allegation of staff to resident abuse was alleged and not investigated thoroughly. This affected one (#46) of one resident reviewed for abuse The facility census was 70.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the facility self reported incident (SRI), resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse thoroughly. This affected one (#46) of one resident reviewed for abuse The facility census was 70.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility protocol review, the facility failed to initiate the bowel protocol for one resident (#57) of two reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 70.
9 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 27, 2025, 5 on October 28, 2022, 1 on October 17, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.10 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.72 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.36 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.01 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 30.3% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.75 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.26 on weekdays and 3.72 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 4.10 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.10 | 0.73 | 4.26 | 3.72 | 5.7% | 0 of 90 | 65 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.69 | 0.74 | 3.72 | 3.61 | 18.4% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.68 | 0.73 | 3.67 | 3.72 | 15.2% | 0 of 92 | 66 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.59 | 0.75 | 3.66 | 3.41 | 10.1% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: ODH Nurse Aide Training Program Locations, as of October 8, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Hillside Country Living CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.2 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.4 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.5 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.5 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Williams Co Hillside Country L's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
33.3% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
8.5% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WILLIAMS COUNTY OFFICE OF AUDITOR.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams County Office of Auditor | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/24/2012 |
| Hauer, Marcia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/14/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.