924 Charlie's Way, Montpelier, OH 43543 · Williams County · (419) 485-8307
69 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365495 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since December 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.60 of those hours.
46.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of recipe, and review of diet and nutrition manual the facility failed to serve pureed foods at a smooth consistency for safe swallowing. This had the potential to affect five (#3, #16, #20, #22, and #34) residents who the facility identified to require a pureed diet. The facility census was 44. Observation on 04/08/26 at 11:48 A.M. of the first pan of preprepared pureed ham revealed the pureed ham appeared chopped and was separated, not a smooth consistency. Observation of a test tray of the pureed ham revealed the pureed ham was not a smooth consistency. Interview on 04/08/26 at 11:50 A.M. with Dietary Manager #302 verified the first pan of pureed ham was not smooth. Observation on 04/08/26 at 11:55 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of self-reported incidents, and review of facility policy the facility failed to report incidents of potential misappropriation. This affected one (#27) of one residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 44. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type Two Diabetes Mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, and lymphedema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated on 02/04/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 04/07/26 at 2:16 P.M. with Resident #27 revealed his smart phone was stolen a few months ago. Resident #27 stated he believed it was stolen, not lost as he always left it on his bedside table. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 44. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type Two Diabetes Mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, and lymphedema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/04/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 04/07/26 at 2:16 P.M. with Resident #27 revealed his smart phone was stolen a few months ago. Resident #27 stated he believed it was stolen, not lost as he always left it on his bedside table. Resident #27 stated it was an iPhone 17. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely facial grooming. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for the provision of activities of daily living in a facility census of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure relief interventions were provided to promote wound healing and prevent further deterioration. This affected one (#31) of two residents reviewed with pressure ulcers in a facility. The census of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided to a dependent resident. This affected one, (#31) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care services in a facility census of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy the facility failed to ensure adequate fluid was provided to dependent resident. This affected one of one residents (#31) reviewed for hydration in a facility census of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up for dental concerns. This affected one (#27) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 44. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type II Diabetes Mellitus without complications, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, and lymphedema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated on 02/04/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up/clean-up assistance for oral hygiene. Resident #27 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. The MDS assessment, dated 02/03/25, also identified obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were followed as ordered by the physician. This affected one of two residents (#2) reviewed for implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The facility identified 14 current residents(#2, #7, #13, #20, #22, #24, #26, #29, #31, #32, #35, #43, #48, #50) placed in Enhanced Barrier Precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), staff interviews, review of the local police report, review of the facility investigation, review of email and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #28) was free from physical abuse by facility staff. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious negative psychosocial harm, based on a reasonable person's response of fear and anxiety, for Resident #28, who has severe cognitive impairment, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #431 physically walked Resident #28 back a couple steps to a wall, held her against the wall with her right forearm, and placed her left hand on the resident's throat in response to behaviors Resident #28 was exhibiting, causing Resident #28 to start screaming and crying. This affected one (#28) of four residents (#10, #20, #28, and #30) reviewed for abuse. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, review of the medical records, review of hospital records, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for one (#26). This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #26's bed was not placed in the low position, the resident fell out of bed and suffered a dislocated left little finger. This affected one (Resident #26) of four residents reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure post-fall assessments were completed and falls were tracked on the facility's incident log. This affected three (#26, #244, and #245) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy , the facility failed to follow physician orders to notify the physician when blood glucose readings were outside of specific parameters for two residents (#6, #246) and failed to notify the physician of urinalysis results for one (#243) resident. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegation of one resident shoving another resident was investigated and reported to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#28) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete neurological checks after unwitnessed falls and after a witnessed head injury. This affected three (#26, #244 and #245) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of meal tickets, and review of the medical record, the facility failed to implement weight loss supplements per physician order after a significant weight loss. This affected one (#26) of two residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed and responded to pharmacist recommendations. This affected one (#10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of manufacturer instructions, review of meal times, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer insulin in accordance with the manufacturer instructions for one (Resident #246) of three residents reviewed for insulin use. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteAMENDED 02/13/23 Based on review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), email communication, and staff interview, the facility failed to substantiate and accurately report the results of an investigation of staff to resident abuse to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#230588) SRI out of six SRIs reviewed. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteAMENDED 02/14/23 Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were adhered to during a dressing change. This affected one (#8) of one resident observed during a dressing change. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the infection surveillance log, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving an ongoing prophylactic antibiotic had a reason for continued use. This affected one (Resident #294) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters had their catheters managed in a dignified manner. This affected one (Resident #30) of the two residents the facility identified as having indwelling catheters. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the facility's policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and responsible parties were provided a notice of transfer upon transfer from the facility. This affected two (#13 and #51) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility identified three residents transferred to the hospital in the past 90 days. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the facility's policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with bed hold notices upon transfer from the facility. This affected one (#13) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility identified three residents discharged to the hospital in the last 90 days. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the baseline care plan to a resident and their representative. This affected one (Resident #251) of thirteen residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services to monitor a vascular access for a resident that received dialysis. This affected one (Resident #251) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified one resident receiving dialysis in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician with a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). There were three medications errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in a 11.5% medication error rate. This affected two (Resident #4 and #14) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer eye drops using appropriate infection control practices. This affected one resident (#33) of two residents observed for eye drops. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters had their catheters managed in a sanitary manner. This affected one (#30) of two residents the facility identified as having indwelling catheters. The facility census was 48.
18 fire safety citations on file: 6 on April 9, 2026, 6 on January 18, 2023, 6 on December 21, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.27 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.67 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.00 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.5% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.74 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.40 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.16 in April to June 2025 to 3.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.27 | 0.60 | 3.40 | 2.94 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 43 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.23 | 0.56 | 3.36 | 2.91 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.18 | 0.53 | 3.31 | 2.85 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.16 | 0.59 | 3.30 | 2.82 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 46 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.4 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.8 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Evergreen Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
7.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
59.3% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
3.1% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ROBINAIR LEASING CO., LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sxcy Mstr Lsco, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2022 |
| Health Care Lease Facilities, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Sxcy Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2018 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2018 | |
| Robinair Mgt Co., LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Gutierrez, Yvette | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/05/2021 | |
| Park, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Family Investment Company Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Health Care Lease Facilities, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| I. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| R.s. Wilheim Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Robinair Mgt Co., LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/25/2025 | |
| Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Rosedale Family Investment Company, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Rrw, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| S.l. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Skilled Hc Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Sxcy Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Wilheim Family Investment Company, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2018 | |
| Gutierrez, Yvette | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2021 | |
| Park, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/04/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.