What is Park View Care Center's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Park View Care Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Park View Care Center get at its last inspection?

4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 5, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.

Has Park View Care Center been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Park View Care Center accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Park View Care Center?

CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to Exceptional Living Centers. Legal business name: PARK VIEW OPERATING COMPANY LLC.

Park View Care Center, Edgerton OH: Inspections & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 5, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 17 health citations since December 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.

40.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

CMS links it to Exceptional Living Centers, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

212/19

705/23

207/24

212/25

403/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

13D

Potential for minimal harm

March 5, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations

F

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure stocked medications were not expired. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 63.
D

Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide bathing per resident choice. This affected one (Resident #27) of one reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 63 residents. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified convulsions, dysphagia, epilepsy, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, gastric esophageal reflux disease, anxiety, and asthma. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed no cognitive impairment, and the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for activities of daily living. [...]
D

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment. This affected one (Resident #56) of 20 residents residing on B hall. The facility census was 63.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions to reduce injury from falls were implemented. This affected one (Resident #16) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 63.

December 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations

E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during a COVID-19 outbreak. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except 10 residents (#11, #13, #21, #25, #31, #58, #65, #68, #71, and #72) who were identified with a current COVID-19 infection. The facility census was 62.
D

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, review of cleaning procedures, and review of Resident Council meeting minutes, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were routinely cleaned and maintained. This affected three (#29, #54, and #56) of nine residents reviewed for room cleanliness. The facility census was 62.

July 30, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations

E

Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.

F925 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy, the failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This affected all 17 (#14, #17, #21, #23, #25, #27, #29, #32, #33, #36, #38, #45, #47, #53, #57, #58, and #60) residents on the Pathways locked unit. The facility census was 53.
D

Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bathroom was adequately maintained and in a sanitary condition. This affected one (#29) of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 53.

May 4, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations

E

Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.

F569 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, review of personnal fund accounts, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were notified when their personal funds account balance was within $200.00 of the Medicaid resource limit. This affected three (#1, #3 and #25) of six residents reviewed for personal funds. Further, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were disbursed in a timely manner after discharge from the facility. This affected two (#161 and #162) of six residents reviewed for resident trust accounts. The facility census was 58.
D

Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the call light and bed controllers were within reach for one resident (Resident #10) dependent for incontinence care. The facility census was 58.
D

Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.

F567 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, review of personnal fund accounts, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure authorizations to open a Resident Trust account were signed by the resident. This affected two (Resident #3 and Resident #25) of six residents reviewed for Resident Trust accounts. The facility census was 58.
D

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to one resident (Resident #10) dependent for incontinence care. The facility identified 33 residents incontinent of bladder and 19 residents incontinent of bowel. The facility census was 58.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen supplies were dated when initiated. This affected one resident (#20) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 58. Findings Include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/23/20. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, personal history of COVID-19, peripheral vascular disease, heart disease, anxiety disorder, psychosis, major depressive disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 04/09/23 revealed Resident #20's cognitive skills were moderately impaired. Resident #20 was receiving oxygen therapy at the time of the review. [...]
D

Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, observation, staff interview and completion of the a lunch meal test tray revealed the facility failed to ensure residents received palatable food that was properly cooked. This affected three residents (#28, #38, and #22) of four residents reviewed for food palatability. The facility census was 58.
D

Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.

F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the infection surveillance log, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving an ongoing prophylactic antibiotic had a reason for continued use. This affected one (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 58.

December 5, 2019Standard inspection · 2 citations

D

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents and responsible parties were provided with a written notice of transfer upon transfer/discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility identified four residents transferred to the hospital in the last 60 days. The facility census was 57.
D

Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were responded to in a timely manner. This affected two (Resident's #36 and #41) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. he facility census was 57.

Fire safety inspections

15 fire safety citations on file: 3 on March 5, 2026, 8 on May 4, 2023, 4 on December 5, 2019.

Every fire safety citation15 citations

F
Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.

K 131 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.

K 753 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Use approved construction type or materials.

K 161 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.

K 711 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.

K 741 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.

K 921 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · May 4, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · December 5, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · December 5, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.

K 351 · December 5, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.

K 761 · December 5, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Ohio	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.72	3.69	3.86
Registered nurses	0.49	0.64	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.29	3.28	3.42
Nurse aides	2.25
Licensed practical nurses	0.97
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	40.0%	48.7%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	50.0%	43.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 4.37 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.89 on weekdays and 3.29 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.53 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.72	0.49	3.89	3.29	3.4%	0 of 90	61
Oct to Dec 2025	3.38	0.37	3.47	3.14	3.2%	0 of 92	60
Jul to Sep 2025	3.56	0.41	3.72	3.15	2.5%	0 of 92	58
Apr to Jun 2025	3.53	0.34	3.68	3.14	3.0%	0 of 91	60
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026	3.64	0.60	3.80	3.24	4.6%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Ohio

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Ohio, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.76	$17.93 to $21.44	63,280
LPNs and LVNs	$29.78	$27.34 to $31.68	39,900
Registered nurses	$39.67	$38.08 to $47.61	143,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Ohio	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	6.3	5.3	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.2	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.2	3.2	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	1.2	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.8	6.1	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.9	3.4	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.5	8.8	15.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.6	1.7	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.0	1.8	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Park View Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

45.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

52.4% this home

Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

3.9% this home

Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

7.5% this home

Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PARK VIEW OPERATING COMPANY LLC. CMS links this home to Exceptional Living Centers, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Medical Rehabilitation Centers, LLC	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	10/01/2021
Lexington Health Management LLC	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/01/2021
Watts, Amy	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Individual		10/01/2021
Watts, Walter	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Individual		10/01/2021
Watts, Walter	Corporate officer	Individual		10/01/2021
Campbell, Brenda	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/01/2021
Lexington Health Management LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2021
Medical Rehabilitation Centers, LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2021
Campbell, Brenda	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/01/2021
Johnson, Duane	Adp of the SNF	Individual		12/05/2023
Redman, Kyle	Adp of the SNF	Individual		02/13/2023
Watts, Amy	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/01/2021
Watts, Walter	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/01/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 24, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Pines of Dekalb, the
Butler, 6.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
Majestic Care of Bryan
Bryan, 9.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 61 citations
Williams Co Hillside Country L
Bryan, 9.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Vancrest of Hicksville
Hicksville, 10.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 14 citations
Evergreen Healthcare Center
Montpelier, 11.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 27 citations
Auburn Village
Auburn, 15.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
Betz Nursing Home
Auburn, 16 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
Lakeland Rehab and Healthcare Center
Angola, 18.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 14 citations

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Park View Care Center's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Park View Care Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Park View Care Center get at its last inspection?: 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 5, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Park View Care Center been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Park View Care Center accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Park View Care Center?: CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to Exceptional Living Centers. Legal business name: PARK VIEW OPERATING COMPANY LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.