4659 Highway 505, Jonesboro, LA 71251 · Jackson County · (318) 259-3290
62 certified beds, about 50 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195568 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 4, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 11 health citations since January 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $17,275 in the last three years; the largest was $8,994, and the latest is dated September 24, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.69 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.
46.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 (#11, #42) sampled residents reviewed for environmental issues. The facility failed to ensure maintenance services were provided as necessary to maintain a comfortable interior for the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 (#2, #5) of 14 residents reviewed. The facility failed to: 1) develop measurable objectives and timeframes to address Resident #2's wandering behaviors, and 2) develop a care plan to address Resident #5's non-compliance with physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to have an adequate system in place to ensure residents at risk for elopement are supervised to prevent elopement from the facility for 1 (#1) of 2 (#1 and #2) residents at risk for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1 on 9/12/2025 at 2:15a.m. Resident #1 was last observed in the facility on 09/12/2025 at 1:55 a.m. The facility was notified by S3Maintenance Supervisor on 09/12/2025 at 7:30 a.m. when Resident #1 was observed at a gas station approximately 5 miles from the facility via a four lane highway. The local sheriff's office returned Resident #1 to the facility at 7:45 a.m. without injury. Resident #1 exited the building through a coded locked door after entering the code himself at 2:15a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints that were not required to treat a resident's medical symptoms for 1 (#32) of 2 (#5, and #32) residents reviewed for restraint use.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's drug regimens were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 5 (#2, #11, #14, #15, and #33) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 5 (#1, #6, #14, #19 and #33) of 5 residents rooms observed. The failed practice was evidenced by residents' air/heating units needed cleaning.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive and accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity by failing to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was accurate for 1 (#32) of 2 (#5, and #32) residents reviewed for restraints.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (#15) of 2 (#13, and #15) residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to ensure resident #15 had a fall mat in place beside his bed per the physician orders and in accordance with his plan of care. Record review revealed resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15's diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy multiple sites, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on feet, paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorders, manic episode severe with psychotic symptoms, generalized anxiety disorder, insomnia, and major depressive disorder. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 9 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by failing to ensure resident rooms maintained a water temperature of less than 120 degrees Fahrenheit for 1 (#6) of 1 residents reviewed for accident hazards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to protect resident #1 from physical abuse by resident #2. The deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for resident #1 on 10/05/2024 at 6:37 p.m. when resident #1 sustained injuries to the right and left side of his face from resident #2. Resident #1 was sitting outside when he was hit by resident #2 with an object across the left side of his face. Resident #1 stood up, backed away, raised his hands and attempted to walk away from resident #2. At this time, resident #2 hit resident #1 on the right side of the face. The sheriff's department was notified and came to the facility to start an investigation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (#3) of 1(#3) residents investigated for position and mobility. The facility failed to ensure resident #3 had proper positioning device, foot rest supports for wheelchair, to prevent feet from dangling.
12 fire safety citations on file: 7 on March 4, 2026, 2 on January 8, 2025, 3 on January 31, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 24, 2025 | Fine | $8,281 |
| October 28, 2024 | Fine | $8,994 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.69 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.45 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.22 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.18 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.3% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 2.82 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.79 on weekdays and 3.45 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.47 in April to June 2025 to 3.69 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.29 | 3.79 | 3.45 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 50 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.22 | 3.46 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.55 | 0.24 | 3.62 | 3.38 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.47 | 0.23 | 3.56 | 3.24 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 55 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 57.8 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wyatt Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 3 eligible stays.
12.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
4.1% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WYATT MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harper, Charlotte | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 14% | 01/01/2004 |
| Meyers, Mark | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/31/2013 |
| Tucker, Dixie | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 12/31/2013 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 57% | 01/09/1968 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2005 | |
| Price, Teddy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/02/2025 | |
| Bolwahnn, Sheila | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2008 | |
| Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2013 | |
| Harper, Charlotte | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2004 | |
| Meyers, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2013 | |
| Price, Teddy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Rogers, Dawn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/1993 | |
| Shelton, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/23/1990 | |
| Tucker, Dixie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2013 | |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/1968 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.