875 Jerusalem Avenue, Uniondale, NY 11553 · Nassau County · (516) 572-1400
589 certified beds, about 454 residents a day · Government - State · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335023 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 30, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since March 2022, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $141,265 in the last three years; the largest was $113,140, and the latest is dated September 30, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.79 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.
15.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided or arranged by the facility met the current professional standards of quality. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for Quality of Care. Specifically, on 02/25/2026 Registered Nurse #12 administered the expired intravenous Diflucan (antifungal) medication to Resident #5 without checking the expiration date in its entirety, including the year of expiration. The Diflucan medication expired in November 2025. Additionally, on 02/22/2026, Registered Nurse #13 administered an intravenous dose of Diflucan that was not for Resident #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was free from significant medication errors. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for Quality of Care. Specifically, Resident #5 had a physician's order for Diflucan (antifungal medication) 200 milligrams intravenously (through a vein directly into the blood stream) for a total of three doses after the dialysis treatments. On [DATE], Registered Nurse #12 administered the intravenous Diflucan medication that was expired in [DATE] to Resident #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment for each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for elopement. Specifically, Resident #3 who had severe cognitive impairment, exit seeking behaviors, and was at high risk for elopement, exited their fourth-floor room through a window and fell to a second-floor patio (awning roof) sustaining multiple fractures (broken bones) on 03/03/2026. Upon the resident's return from the hospital to the facility on [DATE], the resident was placed back onto the fourth floor and continued to have access to the windows in their room. The facility's Elopement Risk Assessment tool failed to evaluate residents for exit-seeking behaviors or the risk of elopement through windows. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (#769417) initiated on 09/23/2025 and completed on 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #314) of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #314 required two (2) staff persons for transfers as per the Physician's order and their plan of care. On 01/10/2025, Certified Nursing Assistant #8 transferred Resident #314 from the wheelchair to the bed without a second staff member. During the transfer, Resident #314 hit their left leg on the metal bed frame and sustained a fractured tibia and fibula (lower leg bones). This resulted in actual harm to Resident #314, that was not Immediate Jeopardy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/23/2025 and completed on 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for each resident. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #94) of eleven residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #94 was self-administering their inhaler medications. The facility staff was aware of the resident's self-administration of the inhalers; however, there was no documented assessment to determine if the resident could safely self-administer their medication. Additionally, Resident #94 did not have a physician's order to self-administer their medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Surveys (Complaint #769423 and Complaint #2580693) initiated on 09/23/2025 and completed on 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse. This was identified for four (4) (Resident #183, Resident #26, Resident # 184, and Resident #90) of five (5) residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, 1) on 02/24/2025, Resident #183, with intact cognition, while fighting over a privacy curtain, hit Resident #26, with severely impaired cognition, in the face, resulting in Resident #26 having a swollen lip, and 2) Resident #90 had a physical and verbal altercation with Resident #184 on 08/03/2025 at 01:25 PM. Resident #90 accused Resident #184 of stealing their money. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility did not coordinate and refer all Level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for Level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #5) of 37 residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the facility referred Resident #5 for Level II resident review when the resident was newly diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder) during the course of their stay in the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/23/2025 and completed on 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment was implemented for each resident. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #6) of three (3) residents reviewed for Position/Mobility and for one (1) (Resident #70) of three (3) residents reviewed for Position and Mobility Specifically, 1) Resident #6 was observed on three separate occasions without a right-hand splint as ordered by a Physician. 2) Resident #70 had a physician's orders to apply a gauze roll to the right anterior (in the front) elbow. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during a Recertification survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #70) of one (1) resident reviewed for Advanced Directives. Specifically, Resident #70 had a physician's order for Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), which included a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order; however, the resident's advance directives care plan documented to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The finding is: The facility policy titled 'Advance Directives: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification survey initiated on 09/23/2025 and completed on 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in a locked compartment and accurately labeled. This was identified for one (Unit 22 medication cart) of seven (7) medication carts, one (Unit 22 medication room) of six (6) medication rooms reviewed for the Medication Storage and Labeling task, and one (1) (Resident #94) of eleven residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) the Unit 22 medication cart was noted to be unlocked in the hallway without any staff members present, 2) the Unit 22 medication room refrigerator contained an injectable medication (Ozempic-medication for Diabetes Mellitus) that was opened and was not dated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/23/2025 and completed on 09/30/2025, the facility did not ensure it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) (Resident #314) of four (4) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, during the wound care observation of Resident #314's left heel pressure ulcer, Licensed Practical Nurse #4 allowed the cleansed heel wound to come in contact and rest on a dirty surface. The finding is:The facility's policy titled Wound Dressing, dated 12/2023, documented the nurse to bring a Certified Nursing Assistant for assistance; remove the old dressing, observe the area; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00380105), the facility failed to prevent and protect an incident of physical abuse for one (1) resident (Resident #1) out of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 05/04/2025 at 3:59 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was observed on facility surveillance video restraining both hands of Resident #1 and hitting them in the head two (2) times. Using the reasonable person concept, this resulted in actual psychosocial harm that was Immediate Jeopardy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00380105), the facility failed to implement Abuse/Neglect policies to prevent, protect and report an incident of physical abuse for one (1) resident (Resident #1) out of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 05/04/2025 at 3:59 PM, the facility failed to protect Resident #1 from Certified Nursing Assistant #1 who was observed restraining both hands of Resident #1 and hitting them in the head. This incident was observed by Certified Nursing Assistants #2 and #3 who were in the hallway at the time of the incident and did not identify, correct, intervene or report the occurrence of abuse. Additionally, the incident was reported by a visitor on 05/06/2025 to Unit Liaison #1 who did not report the incident to their supervisor (Unit Liaison #2) until 05/07/2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (Complaint # NY00340951) the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by nursing home staff. This was evident for one of three residents reviewed for physical abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, on 5/2/24 at 6:30AM Certified Nurse Assistant #1 was observed by Registered Nurse #1 pushing Resident #1 to the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00314085) initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible. This was identified for two (Resident #42 and #159) of eight residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) on 4/4/2023 Resident #42 fell out of the mechanical lift when the mechanical lift sling pad loops got detached from the mechanical lift's sling bar hook. The mechanical lift used for the resident's transfer was missing the safety latches (clips), which were supposed to hold the mechanical lift sling pad loops in place, on the mechanical lift's sling bar hook. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order and accounted for all controlled drugs. This was identified on three (Unit 21, Unit 22, and Unit 31) of 13 nursing units. Specifically, during the medication storage task observations on Unit 21, Unit 22, and Unit 31, the Controlled Substance Administration Record form was not reconciled to reflect the available controlled medications in the medication blister pack for Resident #35 (Unit 21), Resident #221 (Unit 22) and for Resident #7 (Unit 31). The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Medication: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024 the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was identified for two (Resident #134 and Resident#192) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, during a lunch meal observation on 3/26/2024 two staff members were observed standing over Resident #134 and Resident #192 while they assisted the residents with eating.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/02/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs including ensuring that the resident has a call system within reach and is able to use it if desired. This was identified for one (Resident #233) of one resident reviewed for the Environmental Task. Specifically, Resident #233 was observed lying in a Geri chair in their room on 3/26/2024 at 10:15 AM, 3/26/2024 at 2:39 PM, and on 3/28/2024 at 9:46 AM. The call bell was observed on the floor on each occasion and was not within the resident's reach. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Call Bells/Call Bell Audit revised in April 2023, documented the call bell must always be accessible to the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to address each resident's needs. This was identified for one (Resident #252) of one resident reviewed for care planning care area out of 40 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the comprehensive care plans for Resident #252 were reviewed and revised upon the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Care Planning last reviewed 2/2024, documented to ensure the accurate and timely completion of the Minimum Data Set, Care Area Assessment, and Comprehensive Care Plan for all residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment, care, and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was identified for one (Resident #184) of three residents reviewed for Tube Feeding. Specifically, on 3/26/2024 at 10:30 AM and 3/27/2024 at 8:00 AM Resident #184's tube feeding bottle was observed hanging on a feeding tube stand without a label including the resident's name, and the time the tube feeding was initiated. The finding is: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled; Enteral Tube Feeding last revised 10/2023 documented that the tube feeding preparation will be administered as per the physician's order to meet the nutritional needs of the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for four (Residents #151, #64, #374, and #282) of seven residents reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, during observation of the four-bedded room shared by Resident #151, Resident #64, Resident #374, and Resident #282, a Special Droplet/Contact Precaution sign was observed outside the door. The precaution sign included instructions for the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including gloves, mask, gown, and a face shield or goggles. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/2022 the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards for one (Resident #220) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #220 with a known history of Polysubstance abuse, was not supervised to prevent the availability of non-prescribed illicit drug usage within the facility. Resident #220 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Psychosocial assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was utilizing and selling illicit drugs in the previous nursing facility. The current facility did not develop care plan interventions to monitor and supervise the resident for substance abuse. On 12/13/2021 Resident #220 was found unresponsive and transferred to hospital for opioid drug overdose. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/2022, the facility failed to ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes, but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders. This was identified for one (Resident #220) of three residents reviewed for Behavioral health. Specifically, Resident #220 was admitted to the facility with a known history of illicit drug abuse. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/2022, the facility did not ensure that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled. This was identified on one of thirteen units reviewed for the Medication Storage task. Specifically, Resident #364 was administered Alprazolam (psychotropic) 0.5 milligrams (mg) without accurate reconciliation on the Control Substance Administration Record (Narcotic Sheet). The finding is: The facility's undated Medication Administration Policy and Procedure documented upon removal of the controlled substance from the container the nurse must record the date, hour, amount used, signiture and the amount of the controlled substance remaining on the Controlled Substances Administration Record form. The nurse. [...]
26 fire safety citations on file: 10 on September 30, 2025, 8 on April 2, 2024, 8 on March 9, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2025 | Fine | $14,777 |
| May 23, 2025 | Fine | $113,140 |
| April 2, 2024 | Fine | $13,348 |
| April 2, 2024 | Payment Denial | 92 days from July 2, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.79 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.40 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.85 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.33 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 15.7% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 22.0% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.50 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.95 on weekdays and 2.40 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.89 in April to June 2025 to 2.79 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.79 | 0.61 | 2.95 | 2.40 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 454 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.01 | 0.66 | 3.19 | 2.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 426 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.88 | 0.61 | 3.06 | 2.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 432 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.89 | 0.63 | 3.07 | 2.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 441 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.6 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.0 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (29.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
29.0% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 68 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 77 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NASSAU HEALTH CARE CORPORATION.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abelove, Jason | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Flores, Amy | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Lancman, Rory | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Mihaltses, Konstantinos | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Newland, Lisa | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Warren, Lisa | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Stokes, Thomas | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Benden, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Rizvon, Javida | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Benden, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/16/2026 | |
| Rizvon, Javida | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/16/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.