Home / Massachusetts / Provincetown
100 Alden Street, Provincetown, MA 02657 · Barnstable County · (508) 487-7090
41 certified beds, about 34 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225637 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since February 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $11,782 in the last three years; the largest was $11,782, and the latest is dated February 7, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.08 of those hours.
48.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
CMS links it to Adviniacare, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were fully aware of the grievance process. Specifically, for 13 of 13 residents attending the resident group meeting during the survey, the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy included notification that residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances anonymously, should they choose not to alert a staff member of their concern(s), and failed to include the contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number, and the contact information of independent entities with whom grievances may be filed, that is, the pertinent State agency, Quality Improvement Organization, State Survey Agency and State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program or protection and advocacy [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for three Residents (#14, #16, #24) who were observed receiving care/treatment by health care professionals, out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Residents #14 and #16, to provide privacy of his/her body during a blood draw; and2. For Resident #24, to provide privacy of his/her body while in bed during the application of a pain patch to his/her lower back.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for an allegation of abuse for one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate their abuse policy after an allegation of abuse was documented and reported on 3/4/26.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency for one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 13 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, for one Resident (#34), of 13 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was thoroughly investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were communicated to the Physician/Nurse Practitioner and were reviewed and responded to in a timely manner for two Residents (#25 and #6), out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #25, to ensure:a. an October 2025 consultant pharmacist's recommendation to clarify a medication allergy for a medication currently being administered to the Resident was acted upon; andb. a February 2026 consultant pharmacist's recommendations for laboratory test due to an increased risk of the Resident taking the antipsychotic medication Risperdal was acted upon; and2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of two nurses observed during a medication pass made three errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. Those errors impacted three Residents (#1, #19 and #6), out of seven residents observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of one unit. Specifically, the facility failed to secure drugs and biologicals during a medication pass when medications were left unattended and were improperly disposed of in an unsafe manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of the consent or declination of the pneumococcal vaccine, including education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the vaccine for three Residents (#20, #24 and #26), out of a sample of five residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement and revise individual care plans for one Resident (#17) out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to revise the plan of care to ensure care approaches were effective, individualized, and appropriate for Resident #17 who was at risk for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care and services consistent with accepted standards of clinical practice for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for Lidocaine 5% patch (topical anesthetic) was complete and included the duration/time of removal.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 13 residents, received care and treatment to prevent and to promote healing of a pressure injury consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an air mattress was set according to the physician's order.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to properly date, label, and store food and drink items in one of two kitchenettes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#4, #27, and #12), out of a total sample of 12 residents, had their call bell devices accessible and within reach to utilize them to call for staff assistance while in their beds.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Resident Council Minutes, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff addressed and promptly resolved grievances brought forward during Resident Council Meetings held from 3/4/24 through 1/6/25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident protected health information (PHI) was secure and not visible to others on one of one nursing unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with adequate supervision and effective interventions to prevent avoidable accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and consistently implement effective interventions to prevent six unwitnessed falls for one Resident (#15), out of a total sample of 12 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to ensure residents attained or maintained the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To have sufficient staffing on the weekends as indicated on the payroll-based journal (PBJ) report submitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year Quarter 4, 2024 when no nurse staffing waivers were in place; and 2. To ensure call bell devices were responded to timely to address the residents' needs per Resident Group voiced concerns and review of Resident Council minutes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Properly monitor medication refrigeration temperatures in one of one medication storage rooms reviewed to ensure the safety and integrity of medications and vaccines stored; and 2. Ensure medication carts were locked when not in direct supervision of the licensed nurse for two of two medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to properly label, date and discard food products when past their use by date stored in the free-standing refrigerator and walk-in freezer in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained accurate documentation for one Resident (#140), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure March 2025 Medication Administration Records (MAR) were accurate in calculating the total daily fluid restriction and staff consistently implemented the prescribed fluid restriction of 1200 milliliters (ml) a day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a new assessment of the bed, side rails and mattresses in active use for potential entrapment when the bed mattress was changed from the previously assessed mattress, placing two Residents (#12 and #15), out of a sample of 12 residents, who had limited mobility and utilized bilateral side rails, at risk for possible entrapment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the resident and/or their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for one Resident (#141), out of a total sample of 12 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice for two Residents (#12 and #15), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #12, to obtain a physician's order for the provision of Hospice services; and 2. For Resident #15, a. to ensure handwritten physician's telephone orders for Carbidopa-Levodopa Capsule Extended Release (ER) capsules (medication used to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease-a progressive neurological disorder that affects movement, balance, and coordination) were transcribed into electronic medical record; and b. neurological checks (assessment of consciousness, orientation, and cognitive function) were conducted after Resident #15 sustained unwitnessed falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to promote and manage the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted Standards of Nursing Practice for one Resident (#15), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) did not move a Resident off the floor and into a Broda chair (positioning chair) after the Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall prior to having a nurse assess the Resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 12 residents, to ensure staff provided the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the proper care and storage of respiratory equipment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform assessments for the risk of entrapment with the use of side rails for three Residents (#12, #15, and #33), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #12, an initial side rail assessment was conducted upon admission and when the Resident received an air overlay pressure reducing mattress to ensure the Resident was not at risk of entrapment and that the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the Resident's size and weight; 2. For Resident #15, an initial side rail assessment was conducted upon admission, appropriate alternatives were attempted prior to installation of the side rails, and an assessment was conducted when the Resident received a perimeter air mattress (mattress with raised edges that create a defined boundary, enhancing fall prevention); [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations made by the pharmacy consultant were addressed timely and maintained as part of the permanent medical record for three Residents (#7, #16, and #2), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #7, to ensure the June 2024 consultant pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely to clarify the need for two as needed Guaifenesin (cough/expectorant medication) orders; 2. For Resident #16, to ensure the June 2024 consultant pharmacist nursing recommendation for an order clarification was acted upon timely; and 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#16), out of a total sample of 12 residents, their drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor adverse consequences (side effects) of anticoagulant medications (used to prevent the blood from clotting, a blood thinner).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for two Residents (#7 and #16), out of a total sample of 12 residents, that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications to promote or maintain the Residents' highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #7, to ensure targeted behaviors and signs and symptoms of side effects were adequately monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of an antipsychotic medication; and 2. For Resident #16, to ensure signs and symptoms were monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of an antidepressant and antipsychotic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, the facility failed to designate a person who met the minimum qualifications to serve as the Food Service Director (FSD), when the facility did not employ a full-time dietitian.
Inspectors wroteBased on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to have a written water management plan and documentation to ensure a facility risk assessment was conducted to identify where Legionella (bacteria that can cause Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility's water system.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for four Residents (#16, #19, #34, and #35), of 12 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed, consistently implemented, and revised as needed. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #16, to ensure that a care plan was developed to address the Resident's Foley catheter (medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder); 2. For Resident #19, to revise a care plan after five of six falls to ensure approaches were effective, individualized, and appropriate for the Resident; 3. For Resident #34, to ensure an interdisciplinary comprehensive care plan was developed and individualized to address: a. his/her dementia care needs and psychosocial needs as it related to his/her diagnoses of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder, and b. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, interviews, and record reviews for two Residents (#19 and #34) of 12 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #19, ensure falls were thoroughly investigated and interventions were initiated/implemented to prevent further falls per facility policy; and 2. For Resident #34, who was assessed by nursing to be a high risk for falls, to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and updated the falls care plan with appropriate goals and interventions to help prevent future falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored, prepared, distributed, and served food in the facility kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure all food items were properly labeled and dated in one of one walk-in refrigerators in the main kitchen; 2. Ensure the floor in the main kitchen was maintained in a sanitary condition, specifically the floor tile grout was free from built up dirt and dust and the main kitchen floor was free from dirt, dust, and debris, including under stationary tables, rolling racks, dishwashing area, and the meal preparation area; 3. Maintain adequate cooking and proper holding temperatures of food for safety to help prevent the growth of pathogens that can cause foodborne illness; and 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed, for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 12 residents, to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to communicate timely to the physician a newly identified skin tear on the Resident's right thigh, obtain a physician's order prior to providing a wound care treatment, complete a comprehensive assessment of the wound with documentation in the electronic health record (EHR), initiate an incident report, and review and revise the care plan for new goals and interventions.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 12 residents, received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to assess Resident #4 and identify triggers of trauma to prevent potential re-traumatization.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to act promptly upon recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) for one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the December 2023 and February 2024 consultant pharmacist's recommendations were maintained in the facility, readily available for review, and/or acted upon in a timely manner to ensure there was a stop date for an as needed (prn) medication, Lorazepam (sedative that can relieve anxiety), as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#35), out of a total sample of 12 residents, that each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, for Resident #35, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were monitored for adverse consequences of their use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained accurate documentation for one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure January 2024 and February 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) were accurate and reflected the administration of porta cath (implanted venous port, a small device, about the size of a quarter. It is used to carry medicine into the bloodstream. It can also be used to draw blood for testing) flushes according to physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, hospice contract review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 12 Residents, that hospice services were provided in accordance with professional standards and principles between the hospice service provider and the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Ensure the Hospice agency provided a list of hospice staff to retain overall professional management of the Resident; b. Designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who was responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care to the Resident; c. Ensure an integrated care plan was developed to accurately reflect services provided by both the hospice provider and facility; and d. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Plan of Care indicated that he/she required the use of a hoyer lift (mechanical floor lift system used to transfer a medically dependent person from point A to point B), physical assistance of two staff members for transfers and was assessed by nursing at high risk for falls, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her Plan of Care while meeting his/her transfer needs. On 01/13/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 with a hoyer lift out of bed into a reclining wheelchair without another staff member present to assist him and then stepped out of Resident #1's room to get another staff member to assist him with positioning Resident #1 appropriately in the reclining wheelchair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing to be at high risk for falls, and required the use of a hoyer lift (mechanical floor lift system used to transfer a medically dependent person from point A to point B) and physical assistance of two staff members for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the required level of staff assistance in an effort to prevent an accident resulting in an injury. On 01/13/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 transferred Resident #1 with a hoyer lift out of bed into a reclining wheelchair, by himself, without another staff member present to assist him. CNA #1 was unable to secure the positioning of the head (back rest) of the wheelchair, and left Resident #1's room to get another staff member to help him. [...]
20 fire safety citations on file: 17 on April 2, 2026, 3 on February 15, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 7, 2024 | Fine | $11,782 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.71 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.08 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.43 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.20 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.43 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.1% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 58.3% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.82 on weekdays and 3.43 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.68 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.71 | 1.08 | 3.82 | 3.43 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 34 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.64 | 1.14 | 3.79 | 3.26 | 3.4% | 0 of 92 | 36 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 1.09 | 3.83 | 3.31 | 5.4% | 2 of 92 | 34 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.68 | 1.12 | 3.83 | 3.30 | 9.9% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $21.32 to $23.94 | 38,130 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.57 | $34.91 to $40.66 | 13,210 |
| Registered nurses | $50.27 | $42.05 to $65.44 | 88,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.1 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.7 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.8 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Adviniacare at Provincetown's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
58.1% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 62 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SEASHORE POINTE REHAB CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Adviniacare, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 1.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brissette, Brandon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Talamona, Raymond | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Labella, Caterina | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Pointe Group Care LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/09/2019 | |
| Berkowitz, Benjamin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Brissette, Brandon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Carreno, Nury | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Carson, Julia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Labella, Caterina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Curis Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/09/2019 | |
| Pointe Group Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/21/2025 | |
| Berkowitz, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Brissette, Brandon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Carreno, Nury | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Carson, Julia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Labella, Caterina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Talamona, Raymond | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/09/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.