1415 West Foster Avenue, Chicago, IL 60640 · Cook County · (773) 769-5500
108 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145591 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 16, 2025, inspectors cited 23 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 51 health citations since March 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $63,832 in the last three years; the largest was $44,540, and the latest is dated March 6, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.74 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.72 of those hours.
56.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Aperion Care, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 51 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the residents with bath linen that is in good condition. This failure affected all 75 residents that reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to separately launder personal resident items and facility laundry. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents that reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent one cognitively impaired resident (R1) with Dementia and a history of elopement risk and stating he wants to go home from exiting thru a facility door into the community. This failure affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for safety. As a result, R1's whereabouts were unknown for approximately 5 hours until R1 was located wandering approximately 10 miles from the facility. R1's medical diagnoses include but are not limited to dementia, hypertensive heart disease, myocardial infarction, chronic diastolic heart failure. R1 was admitted to the facility 10/15/25. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, indicating R1's cognition is moderately impaired. R1's progress noted dated 04/04/26 documents in part, Standing by elevator to go downstairs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote proper staff/resident/representative communication by not ensuring all facility staff wear identification. This failure has the potential to affect all 72 residents that reside in the facilityFindings include:5/19/26, surveyor observed multiple staff members not wearing name tags or name tags being worn below the waist.5/19/26 at 11:40 AM, V14 (Therapy) stated their name tag was on their jacket downstairs. V14 stated they should be wearing a name tag.5/19/26 at 11:43 AM, V15 (Activity Aide) stated they forgot their name tag at home. V15 stated they should be wearing a name tag so residents and family can identify them.5/19/26 at 11:45 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed wearing their name tag below the waist. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner of a change in condition of one (R74) resident out of three residents reviewed for change in condition in a total sample of twenty. This failure resulted in R74 requiring hospitalization with diagnosis of stroke. Findings Include:R74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted she was cognitively impaired. R74's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was [AGE] years old with diagnoses not limited to personal history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, Alzheimer's disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and unspecified dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have an individualized comprehensive care plan for two (R10, and R74) residents out of a total sample of twenty residents. Findings Include: R74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted she was cognitively impaired. R74's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was [AGE] years old with diagnoses not limited to personal history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, Alzheimer's disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and unspecified dementia. Physician Order Sheet dated 9/4/25 hospice consult. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures to ensure wound treatment orders were obtained upon resident's admission, and failed to ensure medications and wound treatments were administered for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for improper nursing care. Findings Include:R1's clinical records show an admission date to the facility on [DATE] with included diagnoses but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other skin complications, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Acquired Absence of Left Foot. R1 was discharged from the facility on 12/2/25. R1's admission assessment signed by V26 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) dated 11/25/25 revealed R1 was admitted with wound infection. Skin integrity documented in part: left thigh stitches, groin stitches, and left foot amputee. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity when a staff member is feeding a resident (R4) seated in a wheelchair in a total sample of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) reviewed for improper nursing care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure foot care was provided for 1 resident (R1) and failed to assist the resident in making appointments with a qualified person to receive appropriate foot care, demonstrating inadequate care. This failure resulted in R1 suffering physical harm stating symptoms of unbearable foot pain and also suffering psychosocial harm stating feelings of depression, irritability and difficulty sleeping.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a resident council that allows residents to meet regularly to discuss facility policies and procedures, care, treatment and quality of life. This failure affected four residents (R8, R37, R51 and R74) out of a total sample size of 49 and has the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that agency staff received sufficient competency prior to starting the scheduled shift and failed to ensure a system is in place to ensure agency staff are competent in the facility's policies and procedures. This failure has the potential to affect all 87 residents that reside within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's facility assessment was developed with input from the resident's family members; failed to identify staffing needs per unit within the facility; failed to update the facility assessment as new needs arise; and failed to list average daily census. These failures have the potential to affect all 87 residents that reside within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly don PPE (personal protective equipment) upon entering the room of one resident (R71) on isolation precautions, failed to provide waste bins to properly dispose of PPE for 3 residents (R49, R52 and R65) on isolation precautions, and failed to monitor the measures the facility has in place to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the facility's water systems. These failures have the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility reviewed for preventing the spread of microorganisms in the facility when reviewed for infection control.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures for immunization of residents against COVID-19 in accordance with national standards of practice. The facility failed to vaccinate eligible residents with the COVID-19. The facility failed to document the refusal and/or the benefits and side effects in the resident's electronic medical records. This deficient practice affected 3 residents (R1, R17 and R74) reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations in a total sample size of 49 residents and has the potential to affect all eligible residents that reside at the facility. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 87 eligible residents that reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to clean the dryer lint screen thoroughly to provide a safe environment for the residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 87 residents at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two licensed personnel conducted a physical inventory of controlled substances at each change of shift. This failure has the potential to affect 8 residents who are prescribed controlled substances from the 3rd floor medication cart and 6 residents who are prescribed controlled substances from the 4th floor medication cart.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure: three medication carts out of the three medication carts reviewed were free of loose tablets, insulin pens that were dated with an open date and the temperature was properly logged for two of the three medication storage refrigerators reviewed. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 24 residents on the fourth floor, 23 residents on the third floor and 11 residents on the 2nd Floor [NAME] (East Wing) who receive medications from the medication carts and units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly log refrigerator temperatures for resident's personal refrigerators for 6 residents (R11, R42, R49, R56, R57 and R74). This failure has the potential to affect all 6 residents reviewed for safety of personal food items, in a total sample size of 49 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures for immunization of residents against pneumococcal disease in accordance with national standards of practice. The facility failed to vaccinate eligible residents with the pneumococcal vaccine. The facility failed to document the refusal and/or the benefits and side effects in the resident's electronic medical records. This deficient practice affected 3 residents (R1, R17 and R74) reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations in a total sample size of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 resident (R63) and ensure the call light was working properly for 1 resident (R229) out of 49 residents reviewed for call lights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents have a clean, home like environment by providing clean linen for 2 residents (R1 and R54) and clean, home like room for 1 resident (R1). This failure affected 2 residents (R1 and R54), reviewed for resident's rights to enjoy a clean, comfortable, homelike environment, in a total sample of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct care plan conferences that allow the residents to participate in the development and implementation of their plan of care and failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within the required time frame. This failure affects 2 residents (R19, R328) in a sample of 49.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and submit a comprehensive assessment within the required timeframes. This failure has the potential to affect 1 resident (R328) in a sample of 49.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 residents (R1 and R54) who depend on staff assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care and grooming receive nail care and 1 resident (R1) receive hair care. This affects 2 residents (R1 and R54) in the sample of 49 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dressings were changed daily (as per physician order) for one resident (R24) with pressure ulcers, who is also at risk for further pressure ulcers; and failed to have the low air loss mattress at the correct weight settings for one resident (R54) with pressure ulcers, who is also at risk for further pressure ulcers. This failure has the potential to affect two residents (R24 and R54), reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention interventions, in a total sample of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen cylinders were secured and that personal heaters were not in use. This failure has the potential to affect all 87 residents that reside within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a tube feeding syringe was changed daily on 1 resident (R1). These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R1) reviewed for tube feeding management in the total sample of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to secure in a bag the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula when not in use for one resident (R21) and failed to properly date the oxygen tubing, humidifier bottle, and nebulizer tubing for one resident (R11).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff to meet the resident's needs. This failure caused R328 to not have an intravenous antibiotic administered; failed to have an intravenous antibiotic administered timely; failed to have R328's comprehensive assessment completed timely; failed to have R328's plan of care to be developed within the required timeframe. This failure affects 1 (R328) resident in a sample of 49.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications per physician's order for 2 residents (R63 and R379.) The Facility had 2 medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in an 8% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of serious medication errors. This failure affects 1 resident (R328) in a sample of 49.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to maintain air temperatures between 68 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 79 degrees F within resident rooms and common areas in winter months which affected R2 and has the potential to affect all 82 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication cart and treatment carts were locked when not in use and when not in visual proximity of the nurse to prevent tampering and accidental hazard. This failure has the potential to affect all the resident on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd floor of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow current standards of infection control practices on use of gloves. This failure has the potential to affect all the 24-resident residing on the 3rd floor of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that call light is within reach for two residents (R2 and R3) in the sample reviewed for call lights. This failure affected R2 and R3 whose call light were not within reach while in bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that personal hygiene and incontinent care was provided for two residents R2 and R3 who rely on staff assistance with ADLs (Activity of Daily living). This failure affected R2 and R3 who were not rendered incontinent care in a timely manner, and this has the potential to affect all the 20 residents residing on the 4th floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide for pressure redistribution to prevent a resident's (R1) pressure injuries from developing out of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in R1 developed avoidable bilateral buttock pressure injuries identified as facility acquired stage three pressure ulcer (left buttock) and unstageable pressure ulcer (right buttock).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately log dish machine temperatures. This failure has the potential to affect all 66 residents who receive oral nutrition in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to safely self-administer medications and/or treatments. This failure affected 1 (R57) resident reviewed for self-administration of medication and has the potential to affect 7 ambulatory residents on the 2nd floor in the total sample of 41 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that four residents (R5 R6, R7, and R28) who depend on staff assistance for their ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care received shaving. This failure affected four of 41 residents reviewed for ADL care and shaving.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medication carts are secured and locked while unattended. These failures have the potential to affect 46 residents residing on the second and third floors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff donned and doffed appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) prior to entering and before exiting Droplet and Contact Precaution rooms in an effort to prevent the spread of infectious microorganism including COVID-19. This failure affected 2 (R4 and R30) residents reviewed for communicable disease and have the potential to affect all 25 residents on the 3rd floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the call light device was within reach for one resident (R114). This failure has the potential to affect one resident out of a sample size of 41 residents. Findings Include: R114 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Urinary Tract Infection, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Depression, and Abnormalities of Gait. R114 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 99. R114's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents Impairment on both sides for lower extremity. On 1/22/2024 at 10:58am surveyor observed R114 sitting in a chair that was across from his bed where the call light would not reach. Surveyor inquired if R114 could reach the call light and R114 said no. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents lying on a low air loss mattress were not over layered with sheets, incontinence briefs and/or pads for 2 residents (R9 and R41); and failed to ensure the low air loss mattress was set based on the resident weight for 1 resident (R23). These failures affected 3 (R9, R23, and R41) residents reviewed for prevention of pressure injury/ulcer in the total sample of 41 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to check and document the temperatures of residents' personal refrigerators daily and failed to maintain an appropriate temperature in a resident's personal refrigerator. These failures affected 3 (R10, R42 and R57) residents reviewed for personal food in the total sample of 41 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free of expired food products and failed to ensure the kitchen was free from potential contamination. These failures have the potential to effect 71 residents that take food by mouth of 72 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the Covid-19 Vaccine Policy for Staff by not including in the Staff Matrix multiple Certified Nursing Assistants vaccination status working through agency agreement performing direct care to residents. These failures have the potential to affect 72 residents living in the facility in preventing the risk of Covid-19 infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an accurate person-centered care plan for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) related to transfers for 2 out of 19 residents reviewed for accuracy of care plan. This failure has the potential for facility staff to follow incorrect care plan interventions related to transfers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their safety protocols on transfers of 2 out of 4 residents (R63 and R11) of the the total sample of 19 residents reviewed for hazard and accidents transferring 2 residents with mechanical lifts (sit-to-stand and Hoyer) with only 1 person performing the transfers. These failures have resulted in 1 resident (R63) hanging suspended on the sit-to-stand lift complaining of pain; and another resident (R11) having the potential for fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to account for the correct number of narcotics in the residents individual controlled substance record for 1 (R67) out of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services in a sample of 19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure the narcotics in the refrigerator are stored in a separate locked container separate from any non-controlled medications for 2 medication refrigerators reviewed for medication storage and labeling.
40 fire safety citations on file: 16 on January 16, 2025, 10 on January 25, 2024, 14 on March 17, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 6, 2026 | Fine | $44,540 |
| January 16, 2025 | Fine | $19,292 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.74 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.13 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.20 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.82 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.7% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.73 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.99 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.31 in April to June 2025 to 3.74 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.74 | 0.72 | 3.99 | 3.13 | 4.0% | 0 of 90 | 71 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.26 | 0.70 | 4.52 | 3.60 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.13 | 0.82 | 4.37 | 3.49 | 1.8% | 0 of 92 | 77 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.31 | 0.86 | 4.56 | 3.71 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 77 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.8 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.5 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Aperion Care Wesley's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (57.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.5% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 198 eligible stays.
11.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 201 eligible stays.
6.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.
58.6% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.
94.3% this home
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: APERION CARE WESLEY LLC. CMS links this home to Aperion Care, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Meystel Trust | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Joshua Hoffman Trust | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Goldfarb, Brian | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ancona, Cecila | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Campbell, Crystal | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Berkowitz, David | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Frankel, Frederick | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Meystel, Yosef | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Frankel, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Aperion Care Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Allie, Ann | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Campbell, Crystal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Serna, Jeffery | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| 1219 Limted Partnership | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| 257 Limted Partnership | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| 42170 Limted Partnership | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Hamui, Moriel | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/17/2025 | |
| Hoffman, Joshua | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/24/2025 | |
| Meystel, Jay | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/24/2025 | |
| 1415 W Foster Ave LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/2025 | |
| Aperion Care Exec Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Aperion Care Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/2025 | |
| Aperion Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Curis Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| David a Berkowitz Revoc Tr David Berkowitz Ttee | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Joshua Hoffman Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Yosef Meystel Declaration of Tr of Yosef Meystel Ttee | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Allie, Ann | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ancona, Cecila | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Campbell, Crystal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Serna, Jeffery | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.