1600 Saint Paris Pike, Springfield, OH 45504 · Clark County · (937) 399-8131
46 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365527 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 27, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since November 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $18,000 in the last three years; the largest was $18,000, and the latest is dated November 19, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.05 of those hours.
47.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Arbors at Ohio, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, hospital documentation review, staff interviews, policy review, and review of facility initiated corrective action, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and care was provided to prevent a pressure wound from worsening. This resulted in actual harm when Former Resident (FR #35) sustained an unstageable pressure wound from a fracture boot that required debridement and developed an infection. This affected one (FR #35) of four residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (#33) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during a dressing change. This affected one (#7) resident of one resident observed for wound care. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning technique for safe bed mobility was implemented which resulted in a major fall with injury. The facility also failed to ensure a fall investigation was completed that included root cause analysis. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #30, who was severely cognitively impaired, at risk for falls and dependent on staff for turning and repositioning sustained a fall when two staff members were providing incontinent care and the resident fell to the floor face first due to improper positioning technique. This affected one (Resident #30) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 33.
Inspectors wrote6. Review of medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 03/29/23. The most recent MDS assessment was completed on 07/10/24. Review of the Care Conference Summaries revealed the last care conference held was on 01/31/24. 7. Review of medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 11/19/20. The most recent MDS assessment was completed on 07/26/24. Review of Care Conference Summaries revealed the last care conference was held on 02/21/23. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 4:00 P.M., SSD #80 stated they did not hold a care conference for Resident #12 due to the resident has a court appointed guardian and the guardian did not want to be included in any care conferences. SSD #80 was not aware that a care conference with the interdisciplinary team should be held quarterly even if the guardian did not want to attend. 8. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received podiatry services and failed to ensure baths and showers were provided to residents. This affected two (Residents #13 and #3) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the tube feeding bag and syringe was changed per the physician order. This affected two (Residents #34 and #191) of three residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a narcotic medication was given to a resident on hospice care in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #13) of one residents reviewed for Oxycodone administration. The census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to discontinue a medication as ordered. This affected one (Resident #8) of six residents reviewed for medications. The census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed timely by the physician resulting in extended duplicate selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) therapy. This affected one (Resident #28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory values as planned by the practitioner. This affected one (Resident #141) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 33.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the facility incident log, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an intravenous (IV) medication was administered as ordered. This affected one (#31) resident out of the three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 36.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and review of staff schedules, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet residents needs. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents of the facility. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: Interview on 12/19/23 at 4:25 P.M. with Resident #41 revealed he did not feel the facility had enough staff. Resident #41 stated there were long call light response times and they were longer on the three days per week the facility provided dialysis services. Resident #41 stated there was usually one nurse and one State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) on each of the two halls. Interview on 12/19/23 at 4:50 P.M. with Resident #15 revealed he only received bed baths once a week and was scheduled to receive showers twice a week. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of Resident Council meeting minutes and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had appropriately fitted wheelchairs. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Additionally, the facility failed to timely respond to call lights. This directly affected one (#22) resident, with the potential to affect all 40 residents of the facility. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 and a readmission date of 08/03/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of shower schedules and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were dependent for care, received showers as scheduled. This affected two (#15 and #21) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 40. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 and a readmission date of 08/03/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure transportation was arranged for scheduled outside appointments, resulting in missed appointments. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for transportation needs. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 and a readmission date of 08/03/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of a medication error investigation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 40. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/21/23 and a readmission date of 08/03/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the performance evaluations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide annual evaluations for two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) potentially affecting all residents. The finding potentially affected all 37 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a care plan for antipsychotic medications, dialysis, feeding tubes, activities of daily living, anticoagulant medications and infection control isolation. This affected seven (#1, #6, #8, #14, #19, #20, and #24) out of fifteen residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 37.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean ice machine and clean scoop with container. The finding potentially affected all residents except for three (#16, #24 and #284) who did not consume ice from this machine. The census was 37 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of a resident's discharge from the facility. This affected two (#16 and #24) out of five residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 37.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to give notice of bed hold. This affected one (#24) out of five residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 37.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, medical record review and policy review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for two (Resident #1 and #8) out of 15 residents sampled for care plans. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 37.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the proper care and services to a resident with a feeding tube. This affected one (#19) out of two residents reviewed for feeding tubes. The facility census was 37.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct ongoing assessment of a resident for dialysis related complications prior to and post dialysis. The facility also failed to communicate the resident's vital signs and medical status with the dialysis center. This affected the one (Resident #20) out of the two residents who were reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 37.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure an intravenous antibiotic medication was provided for Resident #286 based on physician orders from an Infectious Disease physician. This affected one (Resident #286) out of four residents looked at for medication errors. The facility census was 37.
23 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 27, 2026, 2 on October 24, 2024, 17 on November 9, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 19, 2025 | Fine | $18,000 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.28 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.05 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.20 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.94 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.28 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.9% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 6.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.71 on weekdays and 4.20 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.35 in April to June 2025 to 5.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.28 | 1.05 | 5.71 | 4.20 | 0.7% | 0 of 90 | 32 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.09 | 1.31 | 5.46 | 4.13 | 2.2% | 0 of 92 | 34 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.35 | 1.31 | 5.70 | 4.47 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 33 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.35 | 1.22 | 5.80 | 4.23 | 1.9% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Arbors at Springfield's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (40.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
40.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SPRINGFIELD OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Arbors at Ohio, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ark Opco Group, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2015 |
| B&y Healthcare S Corp | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| B&y Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Cody Healthcare S Corp | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Craig Flashner 2007 Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Norcross, Robert | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Rogers, Stacey | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Kirk, Kristine | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2016 | |
| Flashner, Craig | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Perlstein, Yitzchok | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Noble Healthcare Management, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2015 | |
| Prestige Administrative Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2016 | |
| Flashner, Craig | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| Perlstein, Yitzchok | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.