Find a nursing home

Home / Alabama / Birmingham

Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

1020 Tuscaloosa Avenue, Sw, Birmingham, AL 35211 · Jefferson County · (205) 788-6330

117 certified beds, about 108 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015153 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 1, 2021, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 11 health citations since March 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.35 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.

40.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).

CMS links it to Ball Healthcare Services, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
0E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 22, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    F740 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 28, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and the facility's policy titled Behavior Management Program the facility failed to ensure staff implemented Resident Identifier (RI) #3's behavioral care plan approaches. RI #3 had care planned behaviors of being combative and resisting care with an approach to leave the resident alone and return later when the resident resisted care. On 03/31/2023 staff continued to provide care to RI #3 after staff observed the resident was agitated and the resident asked to be left alone. This deficient practice affected RI #3, one of 12 sampled residents whose plan of care was reviewed.
April 1, 2021Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's status on the completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for three (3) residents (Resident #21, #25 and #94) out of 21 sampled residents.
  2. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately document the code status of two (2) out of 24 sampled residents (Resident #17 and #94). The facility failed to properly transcribe the correct code status of Resident #17 and #94 to the Physician's Order.
March 21, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Resident Privacy, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #147's Foley catheter bag was in a privacy bag and not visible from the hallway on 03/21/19. This deficient practice affected RI #147, one of two residents sampled with a Foley catheter. Findings Include: A facility policy titled, Resident Privacy, dated 12/04, revealed the following: It is the policy of Ball HealthCare Services, Inc. (BHS) . that all residents have the right to personal privacy, including privacy in . medical treatment . RI #147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Hypertension and Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Unspecified Stage. On 03/21/19 at 9:11 a.m., the surveyor observed RI #147's Foley catheter bag did not have a covering and could be seen from the hallway. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #146 had a Physician's Order for the use of Oxygen and suctioning. RI #146 was observed utilizing Oxygen at 2 liters via (by way of) nasal cannula and having suction set up at the bedside on three of four days of the survey. This deficient practice affected RI #146, one of 37 sampled residents whose Physician Orders were reviewed. Findings Include: RI #146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of Personal History of Recurrent Pneumonia. RI #146's Problem/Need care plan titled, (RI #1) is at risk for difficulty breathing related to HX (history) of Pneumonia and diagnosis Asthma with a Problem Onset date of 03/07/19, revealed the following approaches: . * O2 (Oxygen) per NC (Nasal Cannula) as ordered *Suction as ordered . [...]
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #146's suction machine and Yankauer (oral suctioning tool) were covered while not in use on three of four days of the survey. This deficient practice affected RI #146, one of three residents sampled requiring suctioning. Findings Include: RI #146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of Personal History of Recurrent Pneumonia. On 03/19/19 at 2:27 p.m., the surveyor observed a suction machine on top of RI #146's dresser. A Yankauer, which was connected to the suction machine was observed to be lying on the inside of the dresser drawer. Neither the suction machine nor Yankauer were in a covering. On 03/20/19 at 9:23 a.m., RI #146's suction machine and Yankauer, which remained on the insider of the dresser drawer, remained uncovered. [...]
March 15, 2018Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, the 2013 Food Code, and the facility's policy on Waste Disposal, the facility failed to ensure the area around the outside oil refuse receptacle was free from food related garbage and trash, so as to discourage attracting vermin. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, 109 of 109 residents. Findings Include: 2013 Food Code by the United States Public Health Service and Food and Drug Administration documented the following: . 5-501.15 Outside Receptacles. (B) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE . shall be installed so that accumulation of debris and insect and rodent attraction and harborage are minimized and effective cleaning is facilitated around and . under the unit. 5-501.115 Maintaining Refuse Areas and Enclosures. A storage area . for REFUSE . shall be maintained free of unnecessary items, as specified under . [...]
  2. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review and review of a facility policy titled, Resident Privacy, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff provided privacy during suctioning and Tracheostomy care for Resident Identifier (RI) #89. This deficient practice affected RI #89, one of one resident observed during Tracheostomy care. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Privacy, revealed: It is the policy .that all residents have the right to personal privacy, including privacy in accommodations, medical treatment . RI #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Respiratory Failure Unspecified With Hypoxia or Hypercapnia and Tracheostomy Status. On 03/15/18 at 10:45 a.m., Employee Identifier (EI) #2, a Respiratory Therapist, was observed suctioning and providing Tracheostomy care for RI #89. [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, medical record review, and review of facility documents titled, ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for the use of a psychoactive medication for Resident Identifier (RI) #16. This deficient practice affected one of 28 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings Include: A review of a facility document titled, ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY with a revised date of 09/2009, revealed: SUBJECT: Care Plans PURPOSE: Plans of Care are developed . to coordinate and communicate the plan of care for the resident. A review of a facility document titled, ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY with a revised date of 02/2013, revealed: SUBJECT: Psychoactive Medications . PROCESS: I. Unnecessary Drugs . (f)Nursing service, social service and other members of the interdisciplinary team will address behavior symptoms . in the plan of care . [...]
  4. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, review of a facility policy titled, Oral and Nasal Inhalation Administration and Fundamentals of Nursing the facility failed to ensure: 1.) a Licensed Nurse remained with Resident Identifier (RI) #53 during administration of a nebulizer treatment, and 2.) Licensed Nurses followed physician's orders for flushes between medications for Resident Identifier (RI) #3 and RI #25. These deficient practices affected RI #53, RI #3 and RI #25, three of eight residents and three of seven nurses observed during medication administration observation. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Oral and Nasal Inhalation Administration, dated 8-2007 revealed: PURPOSE: To administer oral, nasal and aerosol inhalation medications in a safe and accurate manner. .III. Aerosol/Hand Held/Mask Nebulizer Therapy .d. [...]
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2018
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, medical record reviews and review of a facility document titled, Standard Precautions, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff: 1. changed gloves after gastrostomy tube medication administration for Resident Identifier (RI) #3 before rinsing, drying and storing RI #3's syringe, 2. did not manipulate a paper towel dispenser lever while wearing gloves during RI #3's medication administration, and 3. rinsed and dried both pieces of RI #25's piston syringe before storing them in a plastic bag, These deficient practices affected RI #3 and RI #25, two of eight residents and two of seven nurses observed during medication pass observations. Findings Include: A review of a facility document titled, Standard Precautions revised 12/2009 revealed: [...]

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on March 15, 2018.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · March 15, 2018 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.353.883.86
Registered nurses0.460.650.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.953.263.42
Nurse aides2.15
Licensed practical nurses0.73
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)40.4%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover21.4%39.5%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 4.32 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.51 on weekdays and 2.95 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.22 in April to June 2025 to 3.35 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.350.463.512.95 0.0%0 of 90108
Oct to Dec 20253.520.503.713.06 0.0%0 of 92106
Jul to Sep 20253.630.523.783.24 0.7%0 of 92106
Apr to Jun 20253.220.443.382.81 0.9%0 of 91113
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Alabama, Jan to Mar 20263.880.634.133.270.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Alabama

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Alabama, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$16.41$14.45 to $17.4925,250
LPNs and LVNs$27.42$23.15 to $29.7111,580
Registered nurses$37.06$30.53 to $40.0954,340
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeAlabamaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.812.013.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.70.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.42.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.23.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.82.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.112.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.05.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.221.215.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
20.224.823.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
6.611.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.02.01.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.41.71.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

37.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Alabama: 41 better, 10 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Alabama: 1 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 70 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Alabama: 0 better, 1 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

35.9% this home

Median of homes: Alabama50.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.8% this home

Median of homes: Alabama0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 106 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

9.1% this home

Median of homes: Alabama2.1% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 106 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Alabama100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ARLINGTON REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Ball Healthcare Services, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ball, Clarence5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual100%07/01/2003
Ball, ClarenceCorporate directorIndividual07/11/2003
Hall, MatthewCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2014
Almonte Sencion, MarcosOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2024
Hollis, VerlisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/03/2024
Upshaw, BrandonOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/23/2019
Ball Healthcare - Mountainview, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization07/01/2003
Ball Healthcare Service, IncAdp of the SNFOrganization04/11/2025
Almonte Sencion, MarcosAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2024
Hall, MatthewAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2014
Upshaw, BrandonAdp of the SNFIndividual04/14/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2021: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2019: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2019: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on February 22, 2024: "Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.95 hours per resident per day, below the Alabama average of 3.26.

Other nursing homes nearby

Alabama contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 1, 2021. The Alabama average is 4.
Has Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Arlington Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Ball Healthcare Services. Legal business name: ARLINGTON REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection