Find a nursing home

Home / Connecticut / Waterbury

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill

2817 North Main Street, Waterbury, CT 06704 · Naugatuck Vly County · (203) 757-0731

90 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1999

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075418 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 6, 2024, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 24 health citations since November 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.

39.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).

CMS links it to Autumn Lake Healthcare, an affiliated group of 59 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
19D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
December 6, 2024Standard inspection · 12 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, facility documentation, and facility policy during a tour of the Food Services Department, the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were maintained according to the manufacturer's requirement to adequately sanitize dishware.
  2. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility documentation, interviews, and facility policy , the facility failed to ensure resident food was served at a safe temperature and was appetizing.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews for the only sampled resident, (Resident #329), reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure the advance directives consent was signed and available.
  4. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of clinical record, and facility policy for the only sampled resident, (Resident #27), reviewed for personal property, the facility failed to report the loss of a resident's personal belonging to the State Agency within the 24-hour time requirement.
  5. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and review of the clinical record for the only sampled resident, (Resident #44), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), the facility failed to prevent a decline in transfer and ambulation (walking) abilities.
  6. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and the interview for the only sampled resident (Resident #22) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to maintain clean and trimmed fingernails.
  7. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #5) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to follow a hospital discharge order for specialist consultation.
  8. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #39) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin checks (body audits) were conducted per the physician orders, and failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) assessment was conducted for a resident who was readmitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer.
  9. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policies and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #22) reviewed for positioning and mobility, the facility failed to apply a left wrist hand splint as ordered.
  10. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of the clinical record, and review of facility policy for 2 of 5 sampled residents, (Resident #44 and Resident #281), reviewed for nutrition/hydration status, for Resident #44 the facility failed to weigh the resident monthly, failed to reweigh the resident after a 5 pound weight loss, and failed to ensure the dietician re-evaluated the resident after a weight loss and per the physician's order, and for Resident #281 failed to complete and appropriately document weights for a resident who was newly admitted , underweight and malnourished.
  11. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #41 and Resident #59) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use during high contact care for residents who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).
  12. B
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews for 1 of 2 tub rooms, the facility failed to provide a homelike, sanitary, and safe environment.
May 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 24, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure a follow-up specialist appointment was scheduled timely after a new admission, and failed to ensure timely notification to the dialysis center of physician orders for medication administration at the dialysis center.
November 15, 2023Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had poor decision-making skills regarding tasks of daily life, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney at the time the resident experienced a change in condition, and a new medication and laboratory blood work were recommended by a medical provider.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, policy, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had potential for impairment to skin integrity, the facility failed to conduct and document an initial wound assessment when blisters were identified.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, policy, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had potential for impairment to skin integrity, the facility failed to conduct and document weekly skin assessments in accordance with the physician's order.
  4. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to follow the physician's order and obtain the laboratory blood work that was ordered.
August 22, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 29, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to respond to resident council concerns.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 29, 2022
    Inspectors wroteObservations on 8/15/22 of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and the [NAME] unit shower room identified the following: • Dust build up on the surfaces surrounding the TV • Overflowing garbage container that appear to not have been emptied • The bathroom was noted to have debris on the floor • A small amount of brown buildup was noted on the bathroom door jamb • There appeared to be heavy dust buildup that hung from the bathroom ceiling • There were a large number of dead insects observed in the clear glass overhead light in the bathroom. • The shower seat located in the shower room had brownish colored buildup along the sides of the shower seat. An interview on 8/15/22 at 10:50 AM with Resident #6 (alert and oriented) identified that the housekeeping staff did not clean the bedroom, bathroom, and shower room on a regular basis. [...]
  3. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 29, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for two of four sampled residents (Residents #25 and #67) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) the facility failed to ensure the MDS was coded to indicate the residents had a serious mental illness.
  4. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 29, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #78) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete.
November 15, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for Pneumococcal immunization (Resident #4, Resident #18, Resident #34 and Resident #37), the facility failed to offer/administer the Pneumococcal vaccine according to Centers for Disease Control guidelines.
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of one sampled resident reviewed for an allegation of abuse (Resident #225), the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation prior to determining the allegation to be unsubstantiated.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of nine sampled residents reviewed for dining (Resident #55), the facility failed to follow the Resident Care Plan (RCP) regarding the removal of a left half lap tray during meals.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on December 6, 2024, 3 on August 22, 2022, 4 on November 15, 2019.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 6, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · August 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · August 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
    E 13 · November 15, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.
    E 20 · November 15, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · November 15, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
    K 711 · November 15, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.233.733.86
Registered nurses0.460.690.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.943.373.42
Nurse aides1.85
Licensed practical nurses0.92
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)39.1%37.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover53.8%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.10 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.34 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.230.463.342.94 0.1%0 of 9085
Oct to Dec 20253.260.493.392.92 0.2%0 of 9284
Jul to Sep 20253.290.463.383.06 0.1%0 of 9286
Apr to Jun 20253.290.483.403.01 0.1%0 of 9185
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Connecticut, Jan to Mar 20263.660.613.803.316.0%1.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Connecticut

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Connecticut, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.53$20.14 to $22.6821,380
LPNs and LVNs$35.43$32.05 to $36.948,540
Registered nurses$49.39$41.40 to $58.5840,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.117.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.13.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.516.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.04.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.817.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
20.524.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.310.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.62.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.41.51.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

57.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 149 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 145 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

79.8% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 114 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.7% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 155 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.7% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 155 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 97 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BUCKS HILL OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Autumn Lake Healthcare, a group of 59 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bucks Hill Parent LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2015
Bucks Hill Realty LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization01/01/2015
Schwartz, MarkCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2025
Raad, MarcOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2015
Schwartz, MarkOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2015
Wagner, KristaOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/27/2015
Bucks Hill Parent LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2015
Bucks Hill Realty LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2015
Raad, MarcAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2015
Stern, AryehAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2015
Wagner, KristaAdp of the SNFIndividual11/27/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on December 6, 2024: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 6, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 15, 2023: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 6, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.94 hours per resident per day, below the Connecticut average of 3.37.

Other nursing homes nearby

Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill get at its last inspection?
12 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 6, 2024. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
Has Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bucks Hill?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Autumn Lake Healthcare. Legal business name: BUCKS HILL OPERATIONS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection