1345 N Madison Ave, Anderson, IN 46011 · Madison County · (765) 644-2888
200 certified beds, about 128 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155005 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 19, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 41 health citations since April 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,901 in the last three years; the largest was $14,901, and the latest is dated August 1, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.11 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.19 of those hours.
53.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Castle Healthcare, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 41 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Personal Funds Accounts were closed within 30 days of resident's discharge and the funds balances were returned at that time for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for management of resident funds (Residents F and J).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure immediate, individualized fall interventions were developed to mitigate the risk for further falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident C and E)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered medication to increase blood pressure when their blood pressure reading was above physician ordered parameters for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for physician orders. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure implemented fall interventions were in place to mitigate risk for further falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete physician ordered pre-dialysis assessments for 1 of 2 residents (Resident E) and physician ordered post-dialysis assessments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Residents D & E)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary storage of food for resident use in refrigerators on the nursing units for 2 of 3 nursing unit refrigerators observed. (Intermediate and Arcadia)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation was reflected in a resident's clinical records for 2 of 2 records reviewed for dialysis. (Resident D and E)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with bathing per their preference and as scheduled for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents B, C, D, E, F)
Inspectors wroteA. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, serve, and distribute food under safe sanitary conditions regarding food temperatures at the time of service. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 116 of 116 residents who resided in the facility. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitation of cookware in the three-compartment sink. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 116 of 116 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).
Inspectors wroteA. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman of resident transfers to the hospital for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 83, Resident 120, and Resident 44) B. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the transfer/discharge notification and bed hold policy to the resident/representative when the resident was discharged for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 18 and Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of a required Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 6)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed during a dressing change for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for EBP. (Resident 19)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 vaccines per the Center for Disease and Control (CDC) guidance for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 vaccines per the Center for Disease and Control (CDC) guidance for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions of two staff for bed mobility for a dependent resident (Resident B) to prevent a fall from bed when the resident rolled from the bed during care and struck their head on a nightstand, resulting in a major head injury and hospitalization in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). (Resident B) This deficient practice was corrected on 7/29/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide current education on influenza vaccines and to obtain current influenza vaccination consents for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident D, E, G, and H)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift narcotic reconciliation was completed for 6 of 6 carts reviewed for medication storage of 11 total medication and treatment carts. (Rehab cart, Intermediate back cart, 400 hall cart, 500 hall cart, 200 hall cart and 300 hall cart)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to correct identified deficient practices and audits to measure success of Performance Improvement Plans (PIP) as part of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to resolve and respond to resident grievances in a timely manner for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for choices. (Residents 30, 33, and 81)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident abuse to the Indiana State Department of Health (IDOH) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a safety plan (regarding 15 minute monitoring checks) to prevent resident to resident abuse for a resident with a diagnosis of dementia and a history of intrusive wandering. This deficient practice resulted in the resident being hit in the face, choked, and relocated to a new dementia unit. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments every three months for 4 of 4 reviewed for timely assessment. (Residents 22, 35, 60, 73)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely submission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for assessment submission. (Resident 104)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule, hold, and invite resident representatives to care plan meetings, held in conjunction with the assessment process for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for the provision of care plan meetings. (Residents E, F, & 92)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of physician ordered wound care treatments to promote healing of an abrasion for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 83)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care treatment and care as ordered to promote healing of a pressure injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. (Resident 70)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to follow physician orders related to oxygen administration for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 60 and 73)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin (a medication to treat diabetes mellitus) vials were dated when opened and disposed of when expired for 2 of 6 carts reviewed for medication storage. (Rehab hall cart and 400 hall cart)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control procedures during wound care related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) for 2 of 5 resident reviewed for skin impairments. (Residents 70 and 83)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property within required timeframe to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively monitor and treat pain for a resident with severe cognitive impairment with a healing dislocated and fractured left shoulder for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident F) This resulted in Resident F having impaired mobility and poor quality of life as evidenced by not leaving his bed per his usual routine.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and monitor behaviors and develop and implement a plan of care with targeted behavioral interventions for a cognitively impaired resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were competent to perform kitchen essential duties. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 118 of 119 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 118 of 119 residents who recieved meals from the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers according to the resident's preferences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident 26)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving boots were in place as ordered for 1 or 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 85)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was timely communication maintained between the facility and the hospice provider for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice services. (Resident 85)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed hand hygiene during medication administration for 1 of 3 staff observed during medication administration. (QMA 5)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain floors in a clean, well-maintained condition, replace transition threshold strips, maintain paint integrity on door frames and handrails, and ensure wallpaper was affixed to the wall for 6 of 6 halls/units observed (100 Intermediate, 100 medicare, 200, 300, 400 and 500 halls). This deficient practice had the potential to impact 119 of 119 residents.
28 fire safety citations on file: 13 on September 19, 2025, 6 on July 2, 2024, 9 on April 27, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 1, 2025 | Fine | $14,901 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.11 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.19 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.92 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.00 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.4% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.5% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.18 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.11 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.11 | 0.19 | 3.18 | 2.94 | 0.4% | 0 of 90 | 128 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.32 | 0.23 | 3.36 | 3.22 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 119 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.53 | 0.27 | 3.63 | 3.26 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.27 | 3.45 | 3.03 | 0.3% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.5 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.5 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.9 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Beaumont Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Castle Healthcare, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daviess County Hospital | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2016 |
| Anderson Propco LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Conroy, Tracy | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Russell, Randall | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/06/2017 | |
| Settles, April | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Clayshire LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Daviess County Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2016 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Andres, Anthony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Berdugo, Shai | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Pruett, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Settles, April | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Basch, Zissy | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/04/2025 | |
| Davis, Nesanel | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/04/2025 | |
| Neuman, Menashe | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/04/2025 | |
| Strimbu, Tina | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/04/2025 | |
| Singer, Chaya | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Anderson Propco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2021 | |
| Castle Indiana Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Clayshire LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Daviess County Hospital | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2016 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Mrs Hoosier Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/04/2025 | |
| Tsdama in Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/04/2025 | |
| Andres, Anthony | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Berdugo, Shai | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Pruett, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.