Find a nursing home

Home / Michigan / Escanaba

Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens

2900 Third Avenue South, Escanaba, MI 49829 · Delta County · (906) 786-5810

81 certified beds, about 65 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235651 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 29, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).

None of its 23 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.05 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.27 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
5E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 29, 2026Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to report Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) information to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) resulting in inaccurate reporting of staffing levels with the potential to affect all 69 residents.
  2. E
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's) [ C D E and F] of five CNA's reviewed for competencies had the required yearly competency trainings, including demonstration in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents.
  3. E
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    F730 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for three Certified Nurse's Aides (CNA's) out of five reviewed at least every 12 months.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection control program components as evidenced by the failure to:Perform appropriate hand hygiene during water pass,Ensure an ongoing, systematic collection and analysis of infection surveillance data,Properly don personal protective equipment (PPE) and ensure droplet precautions were implemented for Resident #27,Maintain a Resident catheter in a hygienic manner, andEnsure resident care equipment was maintained in a cleanable condition for use. These deficient practices resulted in the potential for the spread of infectious organisms and disease within the facility with the potential to affect all residents within the facility.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to grievances for three Residents (#31, #43 and #52) of eight residents reviewed for grievances.
  6. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice for one Resident (#11) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization.
  7. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter device was medically necessary and physician orders were in place for one Resident (#23) of two residents reviewed for catheters.
  8. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess the risk of entrapment, review bed rail risks and benefits with the resident/resident representative and obtain consent and a physician order prior to the installation of bed rails for 1 Resident (#19) of 1 resident reviewed for bed rail safety. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for bed entrapment and risk of injury and death.
  9. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a narcotic medication was stored and or consumed in a safe and secure manner for one Resident (#23) of seven residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings Include:Resident #23 (R23)On 4/29/26 at 7:30 AM, an observation was made of R23 lying in bed in her room. R23 had an empty medication cup on her floor upside down. R23 had a second medication cup on her bedside table with a small single round white pill inside. R23 was asked about the medication left in the cup and replied, I did not want to take it. I get all bound up if I take my oxycodone. R23 was asked if she was in any pain and what she would like to take for her pain and replied, My pain is at a 4 and I would like some Tylenol. [...]
May 1, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake MI00152541 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one Resident #1 (R1) of one resident reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in R1 leaving the facility unattended with the potential for fall and injury.
March 6, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn by staff as required when caring for 1 Resident (#21) of 3 residents, reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This deficient practice resulted in the potential for infection, communicable disease and multi-drug resistant organism transmission.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident shared equipment was properly cleaned and sanitized.
  3. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessments, physician orders, and medical justification, for restraints that were in place for one Resident (R49) of one resident reviewed for restraints.
  4. D
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a recapitulation of stay was completed for one Resident (#66) out of one resident reviewed for for discharge to the community. Findings Include: Resident #66 (R66) Review of R66's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 1/14/25 for surgical aftercare following an intestinal obstruction. R66 was discharged from the facility on 1/30/25 following a short-term rehabilitation stay. Review of R66's EMR revealed no discharge plan, recapitulation of stay, nor reconciliation of pre- and post-discharge medications. On 3/6/25 at 9:28 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) M regarding discharge expectations. RN M stated each discipline was supposed to include a discharge progress note in the EMR. RN M was unsure why R66 did not have the expected discharge summaries in their EMR. [...]
  5. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary storage and proper cleaning of respiratory equipment for one Resident (#59) of one resident reviewed for respiratory services.
December 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake:MI00147670 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of narcotic medication for one Resident (R1) of six residents reviewed for misappropriation.
March 20, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to ensure that potentially hazardous food was labeled, dated, and cooled according to facility policy and food code guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all the 57 residents in the facility.
  2. F
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    F868 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee met at least quarterly with the required committee members. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for ineffective coordination of medical care and delayed resolution of facility issues, placing all 57 residents in the facility at risk for quality care concerns.
  3. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program to prevent the hospitalization of one Resident (R205) and prevent the spread of infectious organisms for eight Residents (R16, R47, R42, R13, R205, R32, R31, and R33) of eight residents reviewed for infection prevention and control as evidenced by failure to: 1. Post isolation precaution signage timely for residents with indwelling medical devices and/or wounds. 2. Post isolation precautions procedures in accordance with facility policy and/or standards of practice for residents with known contagious illnesses. 3. Post appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) information for residents diagnosed with infectious illnesses. 4. Develop care plans for residents with known contagious, infectious illness. 5. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than 5 percent when eight medication errors were observed out of 25 medication pass opportunities. This deficient practice resulted in a 32 percent medication error rate, the potential for medication to not be administered, and medications provided in a manner that was inconsistent with physician orders.
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were not stored past the 28-day manufacturer storage recommendation in one medication cart out of two carts reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice resulted in the administration of expired insulin, and the potential for reduced effectiveness and elevated blood sugars.
  6. D
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    F849 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure communication/documentation between the facility and the hospice provider occurred to ensure coordination of care for one Resident (R26) of one Resident reviewed for hospice services. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for a lack of coordination of comprehensive services and unmet needs.
December 27, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe wheelchair securement in the transport van for one Resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for safety and supervision. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for injury when resident wheelchairs were not properly secured, per manufacturer's instructions, in the facility transport van. This deficiency has the potential to affect all residents transported via wheelchair in the facility van.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 29, 2026, 3 on March 6, 2025, 5 on March 20, 2024.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · April 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · April 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · March 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · March 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
    K 711 · March 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Meet requirements for outpatient facilities located next to inpatient facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
    K 132 · March 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · March 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · March 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · March 20, 2024 · Waiver
  10. E
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · March 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.053.993.86
Registered nurses1.270.780.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.443.503.42
Nurse aides3.22
Licensed practical nurses0.56
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported44.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported39.2%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.18 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.29 on weekdays and 4.44 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.18 in April to June 2025 to 5.05 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.051.275.294.44 1.4%0 of 9065
Jul to Sep 20254.851.015.094.24 1.0%0 of 9271
Apr to Jun 20255.181.085.384.68 1.1%0 of 9167
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Michigan, Jan to Mar 20263.950.704.143.453.3%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Michigan

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Michigan, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$19.03$18.35 to $21.5943,290
LPNs and LVNs$31.47$29.83 to $35.5210,880
Registered nurses$45.34$39.46 to $49.74104,950
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.310.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.30.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.91.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.63.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.912.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.35.14.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.714.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.824.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
32.811.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.01.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (39.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

39.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

54.2% this home

Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BISHOP NOA HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sisters of St. Paul De Chartres5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/1966
Beckon, SusanManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2019
Berbohm, KarenManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2019
Ferguson, TimothyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2017
Laurin, Mary AnnManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/01/2019
Schultz, GloriaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/13/2009
Theoret, RaymondManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/13/2009
Theoret, RaymondCorporate directorIndividual07/13/2009
Beckon, SusanCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2019
Berbohm, KarenCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2019
Ferguson, TimothyCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2017
Lafave, JamieCorporate officerIndividual12/31/2018
Laurin, Mary AnnCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2019
Schultz, GloriaCorporate officerIndividual07/13/2009
Lafave, JamieOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/31/2018
Linder, NicoleOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2024
Lafave, JamieAdp of the SNFIndividual09/22/2025
Linder, NicoleAdp of the SNFIndividual09/22/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
  2. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility."

Other nursing homes nearby

Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens get at its last inspection?
9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 29, 2026. The Michigan average is 9.9.
Has Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens?
CMS lists 18 owners and managers. Legal business name: BISHOP NOA HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection