150 North 27th Street, Belleville, IL 62226 · St. Clair County · (618) 235-6600
140 certified beds, about 111 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145668 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 15, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 66 health citations since April 2023, 12 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 8 fines totaling $334,247 in the last three years; the largest was $65,484, and the latest is dated January 27, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
53.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Bria Health Services, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 66 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its residents were treated with dignity/respect and failed to answer their call lights in 5 of 6 residents (R29, R63, R68, R79, and R100) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 49. Findings Include: 1) On 6/23/26 at 11:20 AM R29 stated it depends on who is working, it happens mostly during the evening time, it takes a long time to get care, get his call light answered, and the staff aren't rough with care but are rude. R29's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/8/26, documents that R29 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 14, indicating R29 is cognitively intact. 2) On 6/23/26 at 10:42 AM R63 stated the attitudes of some staff are terrible. R63 stated some staff don't like him and have an attitude with him. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in mild soft tissue swelling of R2's left hand and mental anguish, fear, agitation, irritation, or confusion, occurring for any reasonable person. This Past Non-Compliance occurred from 4/16/26 through 4/16/26.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified existence in 2 of 5 residents (R8, R9) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 11. Findings Include:On 6/11/26 at 8:00 AM, R8 stated the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are on their phones 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, they're on their phone while in providing care to her or they will stand outside her room, talking on the phone and won't come in to assist her until they are finished with their phone call. R8 stated when they are on their phones, sometimes they are disrespectful or cursing on the phone, and she feels that is disrespectful to her too because she doesn't want to hear that. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain temperatures and palatability of the food in 2 of 4 residents (R8, R9) reviewed for dietary services in the sample of 9. Findings Include: On 6/11/26 at 8:00 AM, R8 stated the food is horrible, sometimes she isn't sure what it is, it's over seasoned and tastes bad. R8 stated if she asks for something different to eat, they get her grilled cheese but it's so greasy she can't eat it. R8 stated if she goes to the dining room the food is warm, if she gets it in her room, as long as it is passed right away, it's warm, if not it's cold. R8 stated the kitchen is trying to find out what they like and don't like but there haven't been any improvements yet. On 6/11/26 at 8:15 AM, R9 stated she doesn't eat hamburger or turkey, the kitchen knows that and it's on her diet card, but they send it to her anyway. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record resident review, the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan for Leave of Absence for care plans for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R3 R4 and R6) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure critical sign-out procedures were implemented and followed for 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for elopement in the sample of 5. R2 had expressed his desire to leave the facility. This failure resulted in R2 leaving the facility on 5/3/2026 around 6 PM, without proper authorization and staff thinking R2 would be returning to the facility, and nothing was reported until the following day at 6 PM on 5/4/2026. This failure resulted in a delay in reporting and as of 5/27/2026, R2 still has not been found, and remains missing. This past non-compliance occurred from 5/3/2026 to 5/6/2026.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure no medication was left unattended on a bedside table for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for unattended medicine in the sample of 8. This past non-compliance occurred from 5/3/2026 to 5/6/2026.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to honor resident rights for 2 (R4, R13) of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 21. Findings Include:1. R4's Undated Face Sheet documents R4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a medical diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Lack of Coordination, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and End Stage Renal Disease. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is cognitively intact. On 4/3/2026 at 8:24 AM R4 stated the facility loses his clothing all the time and his sister brings in receipts to be reimbursed for his clothing. R4 stated he will get his clothing from Good Will because the facility tends to lose it.2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse in 1 (R13) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 21. Findings Include:R13's Undated Face Sheet documents R13 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a medical diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Hypertension, Spinal Stenosis Cervical Region, Cervicalgia, and End Stage Renal Disease. R13's Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R13 is cognitively intact, using a motorized wheelchair and/or scooter, and has an upper and lower extremity impairment on both sides. R13's Care Plan Last Reviewed 2/2/2026 documents Abuse: R13 is at risk for abuse and neglect related currently in long term care facility, 3/20/26: Allegation of abuse. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to appropriately document the administration of an opioid medication for 1 (R5) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete indwelling urinary catheter changes as ordered, failed to follow urology physician orders as directed, and failed to verify hospital discharge orders for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R2 developing a urinary tract infection with sepsis that required hospitalization and IV (intravenous) antibiotics. Findings Include:R2's admission Record, print date of 1/22/26, documented R2 has diagnoses including cerebral infarction, osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, urinary tract infection, dysuria, stage 4 pressure ulcer, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetic polyneuropathy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide housekeeping services for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for physical environment in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of funds for two (R1 and R2) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of funds in a sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate services to 1 of 1 (R6) resident investigated for dementia care in a sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to call emergency medical services, EMS, in a timely manner for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for delay in treatment in the sample of 10. This delay in treatment resulted in R2 experiencing a low oxygen level and later expiring at the the hospital from an unknown cause. Findings Include: R2's Face sheet documents an admission date of 7/30/2025. Diagnosis include Multiple Fractures of Ribs, Right Side, Wedge Compression Fracture of T11-T12 Vertebrae, Dysphagia, Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Acute Thrombosis of Left Femoral Artery. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents R2 is cognitively impaired. R2's care plan dated 7/31/2025 documents R2 is at risk for altered nutrition and hydration related to diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism, Fracture of Thoracic Vertebra, Lumbar Fracture, Hyperlipidemia, Dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure physical abuse did not occur for 2 of 3 residents (R1) and R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. 1-R1's Physician Order Sheet for August 2025 documents a diagnosis of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, mucopurulent chronic bronchitis, weakness, major depression disorder, acute diastolic heart failure, pleurisy, anxiety disorder and spinal stenosis of the cervical region. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] document R1 was cognitively intact for decision making of activities of daily living. No impairments on the upper or lower extremities and independent on most tasks and does not need assistance with some tasks. R1's Initial Incident Report dated 8/21/2025 at approximately 1:35 PM, there was an altercation between (R1) and (R3). There was no injury to either resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to turn and reposition 1 (R14) of 8 residents investigated for pressure ulcers in the sample of 38. This failure resulted in R14 having re-opened pressure ulcers and new in house acquired pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow and implement progressive interventions and perform appropriate supervision to prevent falls for 1 (R24) of 6 residents in the sample of 38. This failure resulted R24 falling and R24 sustaining a fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in a manner that prevents foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 108 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse in 1 of 3 residents (R31), reviewed for abuse in the sample of 38.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin in 1 of 3 residents (R61), reviewed for abuse in the sample of 38.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin in 1 of 3 residents (R61), reviewed for abuse in the sample of 38.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to revise and updated care plans with progressive interventions following falls for 1 of 6 (R57) residents investigated for accidents in a sample of 38.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate and collaborate with the outpatient dialysis center and monitor the dialysis access site for 1 of 3 residents (R318) reviewed for hemodialysis in the sample of 38.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates food allergies for 1 of 2 residents (R95) reviewed for food and nutrition services in the sample of 38.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and observation the facility failed to display clearly and in a visible place for residents, staff, and visitors the daily nurse staffing information. This failure has the potential to affect the entire facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to administer a seizure medication for 1 of 8 residents (R7) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in R7 having multiple seizures, requiring hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility allowed its staff to use cell phones in the resident areas, resulting in an un-homelike environment for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable food at an acceptable temperature for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R5) reviewed for food provided at a preferred temperature in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nourishing snacks between meals or at bedtime for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R5) reviewed for snacks in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers and incontinent care to 3 of 5 residents (R1, R2, and R5) reviewed for care provided to dependent residents in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the Facility failed to assess, monitor, and perform vital signs for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change of condition in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2's low oxygen saturation level, hospitalization, and being put on a ventilator, unable to return to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the Facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change of condition in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and transfer a resident to the hospital in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change in condition and complete treatments as ordered for 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6) reviewed for wounds in a sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 being admitted to the hospital with the diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection) and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change of condition in a sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to protect residents' clothing from loss for 4 of 16 residents (R7, R10, R15, R16) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 16.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain steam table holding temperatures before and during meal service and to maintain food at the proper temperatures while preparing and serving meal trays to residents. This has the potential to affect all 121 residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and treat pressure ulcers for 2 of 4 (R3, R6) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R7) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse/neglect, failed to ensure residents felt safe, and failed to ensure residents needs were met in a dignified manner in the facility for 2 of 24 residents (R16, R99) in the sample of 44. This failure resulted in R16 feeling sexually assaulted and fearful to endure a similar situation from occurring again.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed follow their Abuse Policy and Prevention Program by ensuring residents were free from abuse/neglect as well as felt safe and needs were met in a dignified manner in the facility for 2 of 24 residents (R16, R99) in the sample of 44. This failure resulted in R16 feeling sexually assaulted and fearful to endure a similar situation occurring again.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper wound care, and to turn and reposition a resident, for 1 of 1 resident (R270) reviewed for treatments and care to prevent pressure ulcers in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to serve meals at regular times in a manner that meets the resident's needs and per posted scheduled mealtimes. This has the potential to affect all 117 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure mechanical lift transfers were provided in a safe manner and care plan interventions were followed to prevent falls for 4 of 4 residents (R65, R78, R90, R91) reviewed for transfers and falls in a sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove expired stock medications from the front hall medication room and from 2 medication carts. This failure has the potential to affect 54 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are offered and receive if wanted the pneumococcal vaccination in accordance with Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendation for 5 of 6 residents (R6, R9, R48, R82 and R91) reviewed for pneumonia vaccinations in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure 2 residents (R58, R99) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), were assisted with their needs, in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure treatments prescribed daily by a physician were completed for four consecutive days for 1 of 24 residents (R9) reviewed for Quality of Care in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a timely manner and to do complete incontinent care for 3 of 5 residents (R58, R78, R91) reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 44. 1. R78's Face Sheet, print date of 05/15/24, documented R78 has diagnoses of but not limited to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and Hypertension (HTN). R78's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R78 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and she is dependent on staff for bed mobility, dressing, transferring, and she is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications according to the physician order for 1 of 4 residents (R54) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide appetizing/palliative meals for 2 of 24 residents (R57, R99) reviewed for Dietary Services in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and cleanse multi-use resident equipment to prevent the spread of infection for 4 of 6 residents (R32, R49, R78 and R91) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review staff failed to administer several significant medications for 1 of 1 resident (R4) during a scheduled medication pass.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor the administration of medications as ordered by the physician for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R9, R10, R11) reviewed for medications in a sample of 11. This resulted in residents receiving medications that were not prescribed for them or a delay in receiving prescribed medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure food was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 7 residents (R1, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8) reviewed for food in the sample of 40.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a communication system was working for all residents. This system relays directly to a staff member or to a centralized work area for 30 of 31 residents (R1, R8, R11, R12, R13,R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R39 and R40) reviewed for working communication systems in the sample of 40.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error did not occur for 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, safe and homelike environment for 2 of 5 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for physical environment in the sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and progressive interventions for 1 of 3 (R2) residents investigated for falls. This failure resulted in R2 having multiple falls and sustaining a Closed displaced fracture of medial malleolus of right tibia and closed avulsion fracture of lateral malleolus of right fibula.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies related to staff donning and the utilization of appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while caring for residents, failed to perform hand hygiene before and after resident care, and failed to disinfect shared medical equipment taken out of an isolation room for 2 (R1, R3) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored food in a manner which prevents potential contamination and food borne illness. This has the potential to affect all 113 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately develop an ongoing infection control program that adequately collects data to calculate and analyze infections. This has the potential to affect all 113 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an adequate amount of linen for the residents for (R6, R9, R32, R48, R93) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve palatable meals and follow the menu for 8 of 9 residents (R6, R9, R14, R48, R58, R69, R90, R93) reviewed for food in the sample of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the antibiotics prescribed are effective in treating residents' infections for 4 of 4 residents (R41, R72, R82, R317) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 48.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision and allowed a resident to have access to food items which could cause potential choking hazards for one of one resident (R95) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents in the sample of 48. Findings Include: R95's undated face sheet, documents R95 has diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis and Dysphagia Oropharyngeal Phase. R95's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R95 is cognitively intact. R95's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 3/15/23 documents R95 is to receive nothing by mouth (NPO) diet, NPO texture, NPO consistency. R95's Care Plans dated 1/14/23 and 4/19/23 both document (R95) is NPO and receives all nutrition and medication through his gastrostomy tube (g-tube). [...]
14 fire safety citations on file: 5 on May 15, 2025, 4 on May 16, 2024, 5 on April 21, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 27, 2026 | Fine | $40,222 |
| October 8, 2025 | Fine | $35,913 |
| May 15, 2025 | Fine | $35,133 |
| January 29, 2025 | Fine | $32,786 |
| October 9, 2024 | Fine | $43,121 |
| September 12, 2024 | Fine | $65,484 |
| May 16, 2024 | Fine | $41,405 |
| November 28, 2023 | Fine | $40,183 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.27 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.41 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.70 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.01 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.4% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.08 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.62 on weekdays and 3.41 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 20.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.15 in April to June 2025 to 4.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.27 | 0.55 | 4.62 | 3.41 | 20.2% | 0 of 90 | 111 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.01 | 0.48 | 4.32 | 3.20 | 16.3% | 1 of 92 | 115 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.94 | 0.46 | 4.30 | 3.03 | 12.5% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.15 | 0.43 | 4.52 | 3.21 | 8.2% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.5 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.5 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bria of Belleville's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (29.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
29.0% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 77 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
3.1% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
2.2% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BELLEVILLE HEALTHCARE & REHAB CENTER. CMS links this home to Bria Health Services, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 1.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koenig, Suzanne | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 9% | 01/13/2010 |
| Weintraub, Gary | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 14% | 01/01/2010 |
| Weiss, Martin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 51% | 06/13/2019 |
| Weiss, Natan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 01/01/2024 |
| Finn, Illana | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2010 | |
| Weiss, Martin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/13/2010 | |
| Weinfeld, Avrum | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2015 | |
| Dhaliwal, Navdeep | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Weiss, Natan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Dhaliwal, Navdeep | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Merritt, Amy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Weinfeld, Avrum | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.