Home / North Carolina / Chapel Hill
750 Weaver Dairy Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 · Orange County · (919) 968-4511
30 certified beds, about 28 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345199 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 26, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 7 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.79 of those hours.
35.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 7 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review the facility failed to submit accurate payroll data, regarding 24-hour licenses nurse coverage, for 9 of 9 days reviewed (10/14/23, 10/28,23, 11/25/23, 11/26/23, 12/9/23, 12/16/23, 12/17/23, 12/23/23, 12/31/23) of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the 1st quarter in fiscal year 2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired food items, and label and date food available for resident use in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and 1 of 4 reach-in coolers in the main kitchen, in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and in 2 of 3 reach-in coolers in building 4 kitchen, and in 2 of 4 nourishment room refrigerators ([NAME] and blue bird pods' refrigerators) in the 3rd floor of building 4 where the nursing home residents resided. These practices had the potential to affect food and beverages served to the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to follow their policy on pneumococcal vaccine and offer up to date pneumonia vaccines to 5 of 5 residents reviewed for immunization status (Resident #3, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #12, and Resident #123).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) database (Resident #1) and failed to electronically transmit to the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System, a 5 day assessment within 14 days of the completion date (Resident #16) for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings Included: a. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. The discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was signed as completed on 3/8/24. The facility's electronic medical record indicated the assessment had been transmitted and accepted to the CMS database. Review of the CMS database on 6/5/24 did not indicate this assessment had been accepted. An interview was conducted on 6/6/24 at 10:22 AM with MDS Nurse #1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan in the area of falls for Resident # 2. This was for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBasedonrecordreviewandstaffinterviews thefacilityfailedtoprovidetheCentersforMedicare& MedicaidServices(CMS NoticeofMedicareNonCoverageLetter(NOMNC CMS10123 form for1 of3 sampledresidentsreviewedforbeneficiaryprotectionnotificationreview(Resident# 73).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility's quality assurance (QA) process failed to implement, monitor, and revise as needed the action plan developed for the recertification surveys dated 10/7/21 in order to achieve and sustain compliance. This was for recited deficiency on a recertification survey on 2/9/23. The deficiency was in the area of Medicaid/Medicare Coverage/Liability Notice. The continued failure during one federal survey of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective quality assurance program.
8 fire safety citations on file: 7 on June 6, 2024, 1 on October 7, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.92 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.79 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.44 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.82 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.31 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.1% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 36.4% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.12 on weekdays and 4.44 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.84 in April to June 2025 to 4.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.92 | 1.79 | 5.12 | 4.44 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 28 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 6.21 | 2.24 | 6.43 | 5.65 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 22 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 6.13 | 1.94 | 6.38 | 5.52 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 22 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.84 | 1.88 | 6.03 | 5.35 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 23 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.6 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.3 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.1 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.2 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Carol Woods's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.4% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 64 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.
73.3% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
88.9% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE CHAPEL HILL RESIDENTIAL RETIREMENT CENTER, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Chapel Hill Residential Retirement Center, Inc. | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 07/12/1972 | |
| Biesecker, Tracy | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.