7630 E 86th St., Indianapolis, IN 46256 · Marion County · (317) 845-0032
109 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155245 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 23, 2025, inspectors cited 24 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 59 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
67.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 59 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents reviewed for receipt of medications routinely received their physician-ordered medications and the medication receipt was documented in each resident's clinical record to reflect the receipt of the medications for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents B, C, D and E)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for 3 of 3 residents reviewed. Narcotic pain medication was missing, and extra doses were documented as given. (LPN 2, Resident B, Resident C, Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report two allegations of misappropriation of the residents' narcotic pain medications with complete and accurate information and within the appropriate time frames for 2 of 3 incidents reviewed for reporting.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a comprehensive person-centered discharge care plan in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were reconciled accurately during delivery for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect related to speaking to residents in a respectful way, providing services timely, answering call lights timely, and providing privacy for 10 of 14 residents reviewed for dignity ( Residents B, C, D, E, H, J, K, L, M, and T).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was shaved and that a resident received toileting care timely for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. (Resident J and Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for developing pressure ulcers and identified with redness to the right heel upon admission to the facility, had thoroughly completed skin assessments and identification of risk factors to where the resident (Resident BB) complained of pain and was identified with a stage (3) three pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss, penetrated through the top two layers of skin and into the fatty tissue beneath) that required ongoing treatment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident BB)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were respected and their dignity was maintained for 15 of 71 residents reviewed for resident rights (Residents' B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, N, Q, T, V, FF, and ZZ).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain blood sugar readings and administer insulin as ordered by the physician, monitor the effectiveness of an as needed anti-anxiety medication, ensure a narcotic pain medication was administered as ordered, to timely address a dosage for an antidepressant medication that was not available from the pharmacy, and administer a resident's eye medication, as ordered, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for discharge, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for vision services. (Resident 2, Resident S, Resident V, and Resident 64).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication storage rooms did not contain expired medication and supplies and failed to ensure medication was stored appropriately and not left unsupervised during the observation of 1 of 2 medication storage rooms and observation of medication administration of 1 of 3 residents. (Resident 80)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection control program that consisted of surveillance and tracking of infections for 6 out of 12 months reviewed, failed to ensure infection control was maintained by a resident's central catheter/PICC (a tube inserted into a vein near the heart) missing the needless connector for 1 of 1 random observation of a resident's central catheter, and failed to ensure linen was properly stored on a hallway linen cart with the potential to affect 18 of 71 residents residing at the facility. (Resident W)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff remained at bedside while administration of a narcotic medication to a resident as ordered for 1 of 1 random observation of a resident receiving his medications. (Resident X)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for call devices in reach. (Resident N)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' preferences were honored for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident T and Resident V)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to receive personal funds when requested for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for personal funds. (Resident Z)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for homelike environment. (Resident BB and Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete a Significant Change of Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident who discontinued dialysis services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were held timely for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care plan meetings. (Resident N)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facial hair trimming and nail care was provided for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Residents Q and W)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided and urine outputs were recorded every shift for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter care. (Resident T and Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was delivered to a resident, as ordered by the physician, and to ensure a resident who was receiving oxygen therapy had a physician's order for oxygen for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. (Resident 2 and Resident 55)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with chronic pain and polyosteoarthritis had a care plan to address her pain; administer as needed pain medication timely; and document vital signs and non-pharmacological interventions for as needed pain medication administrations, as ordered, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident N and Resident BB)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident on dialysis received pre/post assessments that included vital signs and obtaining weights that were consistent and documentation of dialysis refusals and confirmed dialysis appointments were included in the electronic health record (EHR) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for death. (Resident P)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ancillary services were consented to and provided timely for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dental services and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for vision services (Resident T and Resident R).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system of records for facility staff signing-on and signing-off regarding controlled medications being accounted for was maintained regarding 3 of 5 narcotic logs reviewed. (Facility)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician included rationales for declining pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 2)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a resident's medication as ordered that resulted in a resident receiving their medication in an excessive dosage for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 68)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding was stopped prior and after an anticonvulsant medication was administered as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents medical records were accurately documented for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident V and Resident 2)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumococcal immunizations were offered and administered upon consent for approval for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 7, Resident 9, and Resident 35)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure floors were clean as evidenced by spillage of unknown substances on the floors for 1 of 5 units and 14 of 14 residents reviewed for environment. (Shoreline Unit, Resident B, Resident C, Resident E, Resident J, Resident M, Resident N, Resident O, Resident P, Resident Q, Resident R, Resident S, Resident T, Resident U, and Resident V).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by a resident-to-resident altercation for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents CC and Resident J)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of missing funds to the Indiana Department of Health for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the disposition of a resident's Percocet (oxycodone-acetaminophen) medication was handled securely; which included ensuring staff were implementing accurate monitoring, tracking and timely destroying a not needed narcotic medication. This resulted in the facility missing 44 white tablets of 10-325 milligram tablets of Percocet medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for narcotic medications. (Resident L)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform post fall assessments timely, obtain blood sugar readings and administer insulin as ordered by the physician, and timely update physician's orders for a diabetic foot ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls and 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident B, Resident F, and Resident H)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services timely for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall, notification of physician of the fall, and notification of the responsible party of the fall were documented in the clinical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident H).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the disposition of a resident's oxycodone-acetaminophen medication that had been delivered by pharmacy was handled and stored securely; resulting in missing 60 tablets of a resident's narcotic medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication reconciliation. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained clean and in good repair; the food was stored with a label and dated; the water temperatures were monitored for the dishwasher; and the kitchen staff did not store personal drinks in the walk-in-refrigerator. This had a potential to affect 52 of 53 residents that consume food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program to ensure infections involving antibiotic usage in the facility were tracked and monitored. This had a potential to affect 53 of 53 residents that reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an insulin flex pen was primed prior to administration of an insulin dosage for 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident 104)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely develop and implement an individualized behavior plan of care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for behaviors (Resident 15).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood pressure was within the parameter to administer midodrine (a medication to treat low blood pressure) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 16)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented during a wound dressing change for 1 of 2 residents observed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 25)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment changes for a pressure ulcer were implemented for Residents B and C and ensure a treatment for an identified pressure ulcer was initiated for Resident C.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed: to provide routine suprapubic catheter care and to provide routine nephrostomy tube care to a resident, resulting in a hospitalization for sepsis, acute kidney injury, and UTI (urinary tract infection) associated with his nephrostomy catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care (Resident 36); and ensure the residents' medications were administered as ordered for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 23 and Resident 32).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store foods in the kitchen. This affected 38 of 41 residents in the facility who eat food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were addressed and followed up timely for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for grievances and 12 of 12 residents attended in a resident council meeting. (Residents' 3, 7, 8, 9, 14, 18, 19, 23, 25, 31, 32, 39)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of a thorough investigation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident 41)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was initiated for a resident who was totally dependent on the assistance of others for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for 1 of 16 care plans reviewed. (Resident 12)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were conducted for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. (Resident 26)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living by not ensuring twice weekly showers/complete bed baths for 2 of 3 residents and at least weekly hair washing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents 12 and 26 )
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a resident's MAR (medication administration record) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice (Resident D) and 2 of 6 residents reveiwed for unnecessary medications (Resident 23 and Resident 32).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate the provision of a medication with hospice to ensure administration, as ordered, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained during tracheostomy care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tracheostomy (artificial airway in neck) (Resident 14); and maintain an infection prevention and control program by staff touching the insides of medication cups, not performing hand hygiene at appropriate times, mixing contents of a medication cup with a gloved finger for 1 of 4 reviewed for medication administration (Resident 12).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe comfortable environment for 2 of 4 resident rooms reviewed for environment and 1 of 2 facility dryers reviewed for environment. (Resident 5 and 26).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have written procedures for investigating abuse, neglect, misappropriation, and exploitation that included providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. This affected 41 of 41 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately post the actual hours worked by direct care staff with the potential to affect 41 of 41 residents residing at the facility.
23 fire safety citations on file: 5 on September 23, 2025, 14 on September 13, 2024, 4 on September 29, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 23, 2025 | Payment Denial | 18 days from October 22, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.28 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.94 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.04 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 67.8% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 81.8% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 5.43 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.41 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.19 in April to June 2025 to 3.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.28 | 0.30 | 3.41 | 2.94 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 80 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.32 | 0.34 | 3.45 | 2.99 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.24 | 0.36 | 3.35 | 2.95 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.19 | 0.44 | 3.31 | 2.89 | 0.8% | 0 of 91 | 72 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.1 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.7 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.9 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Castleton Health Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
3.9% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7630 E 86th Street in LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Frontier Realty Investors LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Gibraltar Trust | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Scooper Realty, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Windsor Square Realty, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Engels, Erin | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 10/22/2012 | |
| Oregon Realty, LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Engels, Erin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/12/2012 | |
| Fenoughty, Deanna | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/10/2023 | |
| Gentry, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/12/2022 | |
| Starkey, Tyler | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Waite, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Whicker, Timothy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/12/2022 | |
| Engels, Erin | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2013 | |
| Gentry, Mark | Corporate director | Individual | 01/12/2022 | |
| Starkey, Tyler | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Waite, John | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Whicker, Timothy | Corporate director | Individual | 01/12/2022 | |
| Fenoughty, Deanna | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/10/2023 | |
| Azalea Investors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Castleton Care Center, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Crossroads Senior Living Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| LTC Consulting Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Opco Ca Skilled Mgmt Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Pease Bell Cpas LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/14/2018 | |
| Fenoughty, Deanna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/10/2023 | |
| Garetz, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Johnson, Anita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/09/2026 | |
| Kaplan, Mosha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Pike, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Gurwitz, Solomon | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/20/2026 | |
| Kaplan, Esther | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2026 | |
| Sternshein, Jennifer | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/20/2026 | |
| Unger, Jeffrey | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/20/2026 | |
| Zimmerman, Caroline | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/20/2026 | |
| Engels, Erin | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 10/12/2012 | |
| Fenoughty, Deanna | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 07/10/2023 | |
| Gentry, Mark | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/12/2022 | |
| Starkey, Tyler | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Waite, John | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Whicker, Timothy | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/12/2022 | |
| 7630 E 86th Street in LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Azalea Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Castleton Care Center, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Crossroads Senior Living Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Esdov Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Frontier Realty Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Gibraltar Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Jubilee Master Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| LTC Consulting Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Magnolia Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Millennial Acquisitions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Opco Ca Skilled Mgmt Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Opco in Skilled Mgmt LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Oregon Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Pease Bell Cpas LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/14/2018 | |
| Scooper Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Windsor Square Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Garetz, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Kaplan, Mosha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Pike, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.