6700 E 45th Street North, Bel Aire, KS 67226 · Sedgwick County · (316) 744-2020
159 certified beds, about 153 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175410 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 4, 2024, inspectors cited 16 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 38 health citations since June 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,733 in the last three years; the largest was $15,733, and the latest is dated November 18, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.28 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
57.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 1's responsible party of a medication error that may have affected R1's physical health and may have required medical intervention.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free of significant medication errors when on 04/22/26, Licensed Nurse (LN) G prepared medications administered the wrong medications and five units of regular insulin (a vital hormone produced by the pancreas that regulates blood sugar levels by enabling cells to use glucose for energy) to R1.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 155 residents and 61 residents with full code status (decision to receive resuscitative measures). The sample included three residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) to Resident (R) 1, who had a documented desire for full resuscitative measures. On [DATE] at 04:30 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O observed R1 in his bed not breathing and CNA O immediately reported this to Licensed Nurse (LN) G. LN G assessed R1, then went to the nurse station to verify R1's code status in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and advised CNA O that R1's hospice providers would take care of the rest. At 04:42 AM LN G called R1's hospice provider to report the event. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 147 residents with four residents in the sample for indwelling catheter care. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 received appropriate catheter care when staff inserted the wrong-sized suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for pain and catheter-related complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 147 residents; four residents were sampled. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing indwelling suprapubic catheter care (a tube inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). Additionally, staff failed to disinfect the Hoyer lift (full-body mechanical lift) after use. This placed the residents at risk for infections.
Inspectors wrote- R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- an elevated blood pressure), and absence of the left and right leg above the knee. R32's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 09/14/24 documented R32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R32 required partial assistance for rolling left and right, substantial to maximal assistance for sitting to lying, and was dependent on staff for transfers. R32 had not had any falls since the prior assessment. R32's Cognition Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 09/19/24 documented he had a BIMS score of 11 and had mild cognitive impairment. Staff would assist and anticipate the resident's needs. R32 needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), transfers, hygiene, dressing, and bathing. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The facility identified 41 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and four residents on contact precautions (safeguards designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms by direct or indirect contact). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff had received the required resident rights. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 75's right to be treated with respect, and dignity when her clothing protector was not removed after the meal was finished. The facility also failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for R13 when staff stood over him instead of sitting beside him. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes and decreased dignity.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with one reviewed for notification of changes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)13's guardian of changes related to the addition of psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. This deficient practice placed R13 at risk for uninformed care choices or inability to consent or decline treatment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments and timing. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R) 16 was accurately coded as required by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. This placed R16 at risk for an inaccurate care plan and unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with Resident (R) 93 reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate and safe assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) to R93 during a transfer which resulted in bruises to both R93's arms. This deficient practice placed R93 at risk of decreased ADL ability, pain, and psychosocial distress.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with seven residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and/or heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 22's heels were offloaded either by boots or a pillow and further failed to ensure R13 was provided a pressure-reducing cushion for his wheelchair. This placed R22 and R13 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development and delayed healing. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 52's physician-ordered supplemental oxygen supply was turned on. The facility failed to ensure R109's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) was stored appropriately when not in use. This placed R52 and R109 at risk of respiratory complications and possible infection.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with three residents reviewed for hemodialysis (a procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 80's access site for complications at least daily and document the arteriovenous (AV-a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein used for hemodialysis) fistula for the thrill (palpable vibration) and bruit (an audible vascular sound associated with turbulent blood flow usually heard with a stethoscope that may occasionally also be palpated as a thrill) every day. This deficient practice placed R80 at risk of adverse outcomes and physical complications related to dialysis.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two residents reviewed for trauma-informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R) 75's and R107 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R75 and R107 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with two reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the facility failed to provide dementia-related behavioral services for Resident (R)30 to promote her highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R30 at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations were acknowledged and/or acted upon for Resident (R) 75. This deficient practice placed R75 at risk for unnecessary medication use and possible adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow instructions related to medication monitoring when staff administered Resident (R)303's anti-hypertensive (class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medications outside the physician-ordered parameters. This deficient practice placed R303 at increased risk for unnecessary medication and side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the as-needed (PRN) psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication had a 14-day stop date or a specified duration with supporting physician documentation for Resident (R) 75's and R13's PRN psychotropic medications. This placed these residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 147 residents. The sample included 29 residents with Resident (R) 93 reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure collaboration of care between R93's hospice provider and the facility. This placed R93 at risk of inadequate end-of-life care.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity during the dining experience for residents in two of three dining rooms when staff scraped off soiled plates next to residents who were still eating and nursing staff administered eye drops and nasal spray medications in the dining room in front of other residents. The facility further failed to ensure a dignity cover for R21's urinary drainage bag. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for impaired dignity and embarrassment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide three sampled residents, Resident (R)13, R38 and R189 (or their representative) the completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) form 10055, (CMS) Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services which placed them at risk to make uninformed decisions about their skilled care
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review or revise the care plan to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 19 after three of her falls. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for further falls and injury.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, including bathing for one of the six reviewed for ADLs, Resident (R)33. This placed the resident at risk for poor personal hygiene and infection.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and implement meaningful, resident-centered interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 19 and failed to complete ongoing monitoring for fall related injuries after falls. This deficient practice placed R19 at risk for further falls or injury.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for pain. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a medication error when pain medications were not administered as ordered by the physician for Resident (R) 19. This deficient practice place R19 at risk to potentially receive harmful amounts of her pain medication.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication for Resident (R) 5 was labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards. This deficient practice placed R5 at risk for medication errors.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 89 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) or urinary tract infection (UTI). Based on observation, record review and interview the facility staff failed to change gloves when providing Resident (R) 18 incontinent cares and continued to provide care with the same soiled gloves. This placed the resident at risk for infection.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents. The facility had one main kitchen with five satellite kitchens. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sanitary use of gloves while preparing and serving food to residents in one of five satellite kitchens on the 200 Hall. Twenty-six residents resided on 200 Hall.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents included in the sample and two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 274 and his representative written notice of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents included in the sample and two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 274 and his representative with a bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to update Resident (R)98's care plan with care and maintenance of the Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP- machine that uses pressure to push air into the lungs, opening the lungs and improving the level of oxygen in the blood and decreasing the carbon dioxide) equipment and supplies.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities for Daily Living) received assistance from staff for grooming as evidenced by Resident (R) 103 was unshaven and had fingernails that needed to be trimmed.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents with 27 residents in the sample with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)98's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP- machine that uses pressure to push air into the lungs, opening the lungs and improving the level of oxygen in the blood and decreasing the carbon dioxide) was maintained and stored in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete physician orders in response to the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) from the consultant pharmacist for Resident (R) 60 for the addition of an end date for the resident's PRN psychotropic medication and correction to the antipsychotic medication diagnosis.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor Resident (R)60's effectiveness of Lasix (diuretic, medication used to promote the excretion of fluids) as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 135 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate doctor's orders to limit the time frame of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication and obtain an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication for Resident (R) 60.
42 fire safety citations on file: 23 on December 4, 2024, 12 on February 27, 2023, 7 on June 28, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 18, 2025 | Fine | $15,733 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.28 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.85 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.1% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.9% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.45 on weekdays and 3.85 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.50 in April to June 2025 to 4.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.28 | 0.59 | 4.45 | 3.85 | 16.4% | 0 of 90 | 153 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.40 | 0.57 | 4.57 | 3.96 | 15.0% | 0 of 92 | 148 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.52 | 0.62 | 4.72 | 4.03 | 16.3% | 0 of 92 | 149 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.50 | 0.45 | 4.68 | 4.04 | 10.3% | 0 of 91 | 149 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.3 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.4 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.6 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Catholic Care Center, Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (67.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
67.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 270 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 280 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 191 eligible stays.
58.6% this home
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 169 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 256 residents counted.
3.4% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 256 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CATHOLIC CARE CENTER INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catholic Diocese of Wichita Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2020 |
| Burrus, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Campbell, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Etheredge, Wesley | Corporate director | Individual | 04/09/2024 | |
| Hampel, Melicia | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Hoffman, Mark | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Lafleur, Cynthia | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2016 | |
| Lazar, Jerald | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Macias, Jean | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Meier, Connor | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Oblinger, Warren | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Pool, Susan | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Schumer, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Strecker, Kevin | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Tran, Dan | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| York, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 07/02/2020 | |
| Bretton, Angelica | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/04/2022 | |
| Davis, Brenda | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/19/2020 | |
| Dehass, Brenda | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2015 | |
| Funk, Jonathan | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/11/2024 | |
| Guthrie, George | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/29/2013 | |
| Hajdukovich, Suzanne | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Hiebert, Devon | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/23/2024 | |
| Lafleur, Cynthia | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2016 | |
| Meier-McFerren, Shawn | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/19/2019 | |
| Ramirez, Monica | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/25/2025 | |
| Sanders, Jennifer | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/16/2008 | |
| Shaddox, Ashleigh | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/21/2025 | |
| Foreman, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/08/2024 | |
| Hiebert, Devon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/18/2021 | |
| Ramirez, Monica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/25/2025 | |
| Solomon, Levette | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/27/1998 | |
| Tran, Dan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Williams, Necol | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/21/2022 | |
| Bretton, Angelica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2022 | |
| Dehass, Brenda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2015 | |
| Funk, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/11/2024 | |
| Guthrie, George | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/29/2013 | |
| Hajdukovich, Suzanne | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Hiebert, Devon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/18/2021 | |
| Lafleur, Cynthia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2016 | |
| Meier-McFerren, Shawn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/19/2019 | |
| Ramirez, Monica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/25/2025 | |
| Shaddox, Ashleigh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/21/2025 | |
| Solomon, Levette | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/27/1998 | |
| Tran, Dan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/05/2022 | |
| Williams, Necol | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/02/1971 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.