Home / Tennessee / Mount Juliet
2650 North Mt Juliet Road, Mount Juliet, TN 37122 · Wilson County · (615) 758-4100
106 certified beds, about 92 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 445439 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 30, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Tennessee average is 4.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since March 2020, 11 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (11 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $211,244 in the last three years; the largest was $211,244, and the latest is dated April 11, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.95 hours per resident per day, against 3.80 across Tennessee and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
67.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Tennessee average 48.9%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on the policy review, observation, interview, and product information sheets, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 1of 4 common hallways (200 hall) when the facility left a bleach germicidal spray cleaner and a disinfectant spray easily accessible to residents on the 200 hall, and when unsecured sharps were observed in 5 of 52 (Resident #2, #75, #76, #88, and 90) resident rooms observed for accident hazards. There were 5 residents with wandering behaviors in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, resident fund statement review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative when the amount in the residents' account exceeded the eligibility limit for 4 of 37 residents (Resident #45, #59, #86, and #87) and when the facility failed to refund the resident's funds within 30 days of death or discharge for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #103) reviewed for personal fund account statements.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to follow physician orders to meet professional standards of practice for 7 of 21 (Resident #3, #6, #7, #11, #12, #14 and #45) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to prevent the spread of infection when 2 of 4 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B and D) staff failed to perform hand hygiene for 3 of 9 (Resident #1, #18 and #75) residents, 2 of 4 (LPN B and Registered Nurse (RN) C) nurses failed to clean reusable equipment between residents for 2 of 9 (Resident #18 and #45) during medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 2 of 53 (Resident #5, #46, #55, and #93) shared resident bathrooms, and for 2 of 53 (Resident #64, #76, and #92) shared resident rooms observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health, Police Incident Report dated [DATE] review, facility investigation review, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse/sexual for 6 of 9 (Residents #3, #7, #9, #11, #14, and #15) sampled residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. On [DATE] during group activities Resident #11, who had a BIMS of 12, approached Resident #15, who had a BIMS of 4, began to rub across her shoulders and back, and then tried to kiss her. Resident #15 told Resident #11 to stop and pushed him away. Resident #11 then put some money on the table in front of Resident #15 and pushed it towards her while saying, If this isn't enough, let me know. On [DATE] Resident #11 approached Resident #15 during activities and pulled up his shirt and began rubbing his nipples. Resident #15 pushed him away from her. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, (Named Glucometer- a device used to check blood sugar levels with the use of a blood sample) User's Guide review, Guidelines for General Use of (Named germicidal cloth) wipes used by the facility review, DME (Durable Medical Equipment) supplier recommendation letter review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when a multi-use blood glucose meter was not cleaned and disinfected with facility required cleansing wipes to prevent cross-contamination of bloodborne pathogens for 2 of 11 (Residents #17 and Resident #18) sampled residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify and consult the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) of a change in condition related to falls 1 of 6 (Resident #7) sampled residents reviewed for change in condition. On [DATE], Resident #7 had an unwitnessed fall and was found on the floor with his head under the bed. Resident #7 hit his head while being placed back in bed by staff. The Physician/NP was not notified of Resident #7's unwitnessed fall on [DATE], and on [DATE], Resident #7 experienced a change in mental status. The NP was notified on [DATE] (1 day after the change in mental status and 4 days after the unwitnessed fall) of Resident #7's change in condition and again, was not notified of the unwitnessed fall the resident sustained on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate information for transfer or discharge was communicated to the receiving healthcare facility or provider for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) sampled residents reviewed. Resident #7 was transferred to Hospital #1 Emergency Department (ED) on 1/29/2024 for evaluation of a change in mental status. Facility nursing staff failed to communicate information related to Resident #7's unwitnessed fall on 1/25/2024 on the written report to Hospital #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 (Resident #3, Resident #10, and Resident #15) of 20 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess after a fall, care for a resident after a fall, and monitor after a fall for 1 of 6 (Resident #7) sampled residents reviewed for falls. On [DATE] at 5:30 PM, Resident #7, known to have a history of falls with injury, was found on the floor following an unwitnessed fall from bed. There was no documentation to show a post-fall assessment was completed prior to moving Resident #7 from the floor to the bed. There was no documentation to show neuro checks were conducted. There was no incident report or investigation documented following the unwitnessed fall to determine the root cause. There were no immediate interventions documented following the fall. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment that is free from accident hazards for 1 of 6 (Resident #7) sampled residents reviewed for falls. On [DATE] at 5:30 PM, Resident #7, known to have a history of falls with injury, was found on the floor following an unwitnessed fall from bed. LPN G documented staff (CNA AA and CNA CC) assisted Resident #7 off the floor and Resident #7 hit his head on the bed. CNA AA and CNA CC then placed Resident #7 back in bed. There was no documentation to show a post-fall assessment was completed prior to moving Resident #7 from the floor to the bed. There was no documentation to show neuro checks were conducted. There was no incident report or investigation documented following the unwitnessed fall to determine the root cause. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, documentation review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a nourishing snack at bedtime between the evening and breakfast meal which was 15 hours affecting 84 of the 90 resident census.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 observations in the dietary department.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to handle soiled Transmission Based Precaution linen in a manner to prevent spread of infection and the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was kept off the floor for Residents #70 and #79.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure positioning needs were in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #45) reviewed. The facility failed to follow Physician's Orders for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #381) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to change the humidifier bottle weekly for 2 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #29 and Resident #38) and failed to change oxygen tubing weekly for 3 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #29, Resident #38, and Resident #70) and failed to store a nebulizer mask in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #79) reviewed receiving respiratory treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, facility documentation review, and interview, the facility failed to have eight hours of consecutive Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for four days out of eighteen months reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on Manufacturer Guidelines, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to perform an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Assessment (AIMS) for the use of Reglan for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #45) reviewed for unneccessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a duration for the use of PRN (as needed) psychotropic (chemical substance that alters perception, mood, consciousness, cognition or behavior) medication for 3 of 61 sampled residents (#28, #32, and #36) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Review of the facility policy Use of Psychotropic Drugs Policy, dated 5/1/2017 and revised on 6/8/2021, revealed .PRN orders for psychotropic drugs shall be used only when the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record, and for a limited duration (i.e. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assure drugs and biologicals were properly labeled, were stored in sanitary conditions, were not expired and were stored in a locked compartment for 1 of 5 medication carts. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #45 and #74) receiving enteral feeding. Review of the facility policy titled, Housekeeping-Cleaning and Disinfection, dated 11/30/2018 and revised 7/12/2021, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible .Routine cleaning of environmental surfaces and non-critical resident care items shall be performed according to a predetermined schedule to keep surfaces clean and dust free .Horizontal surfaces with infrequent hand contact .in routine resident-care areas should be cleaned: a. On a regular basis b. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 of 38 residents (Resident #33) was free from abuse placing the resident in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) when Resident #33 sustained a left humerus (long bone that extends from the shoulder to the elbow) fracture during an attempted transfer, without a mechanical lift, on 10/22/2019. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to report an abuse allegation to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #33) reviewed or abuse. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Nurse Consultants were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 3/3/2020 at 7:31 PM in the Administrator's office. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-609. The facility was cited at F-609 at a scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed onsite and was effective from 10/2/2019 through 3/5/2020. An Immediate Action Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy was received on 3/6/2020 at 2:55 PM. The corrective actions were validated onsite by the surveyors on 3/6/2020. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate an abuse allegation for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for abuse. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-610. The facility was cited at F-610 at a scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed onsite and was effective from 10/2/2019 through 3/5/2020. An Immediate Action Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy was received on 3/6/2020 at 2:55 PM. The corrective actions were validated onsite by the surveyors on 3/6/2020. The facility's noncompliance at F-610 continues a a scope and severity of, D for monitoring of the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan with interventions related to blood sugar monitoring and tube feeding residual to prevent hypoglycemia for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for implementation of care plans placing Resident #77 in Immediate Jeopardy (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) when Resident #77 became unresponsive, hypoglycemic, and required emergent hospitalization. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 3/5/2020 at 3:50 PM in the Administrators office. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-656. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's Advance Directive preference was accurately reflected in the medical record for 2 of 91 residents (Resident #49 and #6) reviewed for Advance Directives, placing the residents in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The facility's failure to follow their procedures for processing Advance Directives, had the potential for staff not intervening with life saving measures, (CPR [Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation]) for Resident #49 when Resident #49 wanted CPR and intervening with life saving measures (CPR) for Resident #6, when Resident #6 wanted to be a DNR [Do Not Resuscitate]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the prescribed tube feeding formula was available for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for tube feedings when Resident #77's prescribed tube feeding was substituted with a tube feeding formula that required an increase in rate to equal the nutritional value. The increase in the tube feeding rate resulted in Resident #77's increased residuals, tube feedings held frequently, and rate had to be decreased, so the resident was not provided the required caloric intake to sustain him in his severely malnourished state, which resulted in unresponsiveness, hypoglycemia, and emergent hospitalization. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Nurse Consultants were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 3/3/2020 at 7:31 PM in the Administrator's office. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, facility documentation review, medical record review, and interview facility administration failed to recognize, report, and investigate an abuse allegation for 1 resident (Resident #33) reviewed for reporting an abuse allegation and failed to ensure the residents' Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms for 2 residents (Resident #6 and #49) reviewed for Advance Directives were accurately reflected in the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) regarding the residents' Code status preferences, and failed to implement a Comprehensive care plan for hypoglycemia for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for Comprehensive care plans. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan review, policy review, medical record review, and interview, the QAPI committee failed to identify deficient practice for investigating allegations of abuse for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for abuse; failed to identify no person centered care plan was implemented for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for care plan implementation and interventions; and failed to identify the prescribed tube feeding formula was unavailable for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for tube feedings which resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to change, date, and initial a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) (a form of intravenous access that can be used for prolonged period of time) line dressing for 3 (Resident #58, #68, and #135) of 5 residents reviewed with PICC lines.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain dignity for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #18) reviewed who required an indwelling urinary catheter.
10 fire safety citations on file: 8 on July 30, 2025, 1 on December 15, 2021, 1 on March 10, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 11, 2024 | Fine | $211,244 |
| April 11, 2024 | Payment Denial | 8 days from April 17, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.95 | 3.80 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.92 | 3.31 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.56 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 67.0% | 48.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.5% | 43.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.97 on weekdays and 4.92 on weekends, 1% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 40.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.71 in April to June 2025 to 4.95 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.95 | 0.39 | 4.97 | 4.92 | 40.9% | 0 of 90 | 92 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.28 | 0.60 | 4.54 | 3.62 | 23.6% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.95 | 0.45 | 4.29 | 3.08 | 32.6% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.71 | 0.60 | 3.97 | 3.06 | 24.3% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Tennessee, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.56 | 3.95 | 3.27 | 4.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.09 to $19.66 | 27,040 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.31 | $23.64 to $30.12 | 20,830 |
| Registered nurses | $39.18 | $36.28 to $45.79 | 72,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.6 | 14.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.3 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.5 | 16.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.4 | 22.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.4 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cedar Creek Post Acute's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Tennessee: 62 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
8.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Tennessee: 1 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 68 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Tennessee: 2 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
53.9% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee58.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee0.8% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 78 residents counted.
2.5% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 78 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee98.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Tennessee. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.