Find a nursing home

Home / California / Yucaipa

Cedar Mountain Post Acute

11970 4th St., Yucaipa, CA 92399 · San Bernardino County · (909) 790-2273

99 certified beds, about 94 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555494 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 25, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 23 health citations since December 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.65 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

46.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

CMS links it to Madison Creek Partners, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
21D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 21, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their own policy regarding safety and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a fall incident during a transfer to a shower chair on March 14, 2026. This failure may have potentially contributed to Resident 1 sustaining acute mildly displaced fracture of the proximal tibia and proximal fibular shaft (a recent break in the upper neck of the knee and the thin shin bone).
January 16, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services, which were consistent with the resident's needs and choices, for residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (those needed for self-care and mobility and include activities such as bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, ambulation, toileting, eating, transferring, and communicating) independently for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1, who was dependent for self-care and mobility, was repositioned by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) in bed by himself, dishonoring Resident 1's Wife's preference for Resident 1 for a two-person assist (safe patient handling technique in healthcare where two trained caregivers help someone move, transfer, or perform daily activities when they can't do it alone). [...]
November 25, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment for one of four sampled residents (Resident 12) when the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool) assessment did not reflect the accurate status of Resident 12 who was receiving hospice (end of life care) services. This failure had the potential for unmet services necessary for Resident 12's hospice care.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and person-centered care plans for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25) when:a. There was no care plan addressing anticoagulant (medication that helps prevent blood clots) use for Resident 25.b. The facility did not implement injury prevention interventions identified in Resident 25's fall risk care plan. These failures had the potential to result in complications from anticoagulant therapy and injury from falls for Resident 25.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 17, Resident 22, and Resident 25) were free from accident hazards when:a. The wheelchair arm rests for Resident 22 were peeled off with abrasive fragments and exposed cushion.b. Floor mats were not provided as ordered for injury prevention interventions for Resident 17. c. Floor mats were not provided as ordered for injury prevention interventions for Resident 25. These failures had the potential to compromise the safety of Residents 22, 17, and 25 and result in skin breakdown, accidents, and injuries.
  4. D
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    F790 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services, including the timely provision and replacement of dentures, were provided to one of one sampled resident (Resident 84). This failure had the potential to result in impaired nutrition, oral pain and discomfort, difficulty eating, and decreased quality of life for Resident 84.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of spreadable diseases and infections when:1. One gray basin was found on the bathroom floor containing four food containers and two utensils.2. Respiratory Therapist 1 (RT 1) did not do hand hygiene after stepping out from Resident 58's room and after removing gloves.3. Three resident trash bins were full and overflowing. These deficient practices posed the risk for transmission of communicable diseases and infections to residents in the facility.
October 9, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility staff failed to notify the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 2 had twenty-four episodes of high blood pressure (blood pressure higher than 160) and were not reported to the doctor. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 2 to suffer complications. 2. Resident 2 had eight episodes of high blood sugars and were not reported to the doctor. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 2 to suffer complications.
March 16, 2023Standard inspection · 12 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food safety practices to prevent foodborne illnesses as evidenced by food debris, black grime and dirt were observed under the kitchen stove and griddle. This failure had the potential to result in food contamination and foodborne illnesses to medically compromised population of 71 of 94 residents in the facility.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the status of a pressure injury (a wound developed on bony prominences as a result of prolonged pressure) in the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a computerized clinical assessment) for Resident 31. This failure had the potential to inaccurately reflect Resident 31's status to the oversight agency (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services - CMS), who provides funding for Resident 31.
  3. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to submit an updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal screening requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) after a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person think, feels, and behaves, and is often characterized by symptoms of visual or auditory hallucinations) had been identified after admission for Resident 78. This failure had the potential for Resident 78 not to be accurately assessed by a qualified mental health professional, in order to ensure proper placement related to his mental illness.
  4. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify mental disorders during the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a screening to identify the presence of serious mental illness) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 61). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 61 not to receive specialized mental health services.
  5. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain and improve one of one sampled resident (Resident 36) ability to communicate her needs to the facility staff. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 36's needs to go unmet resulting in frustration, pain, and discomfort.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 36) was repositioned every two hours to promote healing of Resident 36's Stage IV pressure sore (an injury caused by prolonged pressure that is very deep, reaching into muscle and bone). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 36's Stage IV pressure sore to worsen or additional pressure sores to develop.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a valid assistance device (fire extinguisher) to prevent accidents when: 1. Resident 50 was found smoking on the outside patio without one-to-one supervision. This failure had the potential for Resident 50 to have a smoking accident. 2. A fire extinguisher's inspection tag had expired, and the fire extinguisher was mounted in the smoking area for use. This failure had the potential for residents to be exposed to injuries for outdated equipment.
  8. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care when a Physicians order for Oxygen therapy was not followed for one of three residents (Resident 59). This failure had the potential for resident 59 to experience shortness of breath.
  9. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wrote2. During a review of Resident 78's clinical record, the face sheet (contains admission and demographic information) indicated Resident 78 was admitted on [DATE], with current diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, and is often characterized by symptoms of visual or auditory hallucinations). Further review of the clinical record indicated the resident had a current physician's order for Seroquel Oral Tablet 50 mg [milligram - unit of measurement] .Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for schizophrenia m/b [manifested by] auditory hallucinations . During a concurrent observation and interview on March 13, 2023, at 8:22 AM, Resident 78 was observed lying in bed, mumbling, and talking to himself. No one else was at his bedside at the time. [...]
  10. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor antipsychotic medication for effectiveness and adverse [harmful] side effects for one of one sampled resident (Resident 12). This failure had the potential to cause ineffective control of symptoms to go unrecognized and unaddressed. In addition, Resident 12 had the potential to suffer prolonged adverse side effects of the medication.
  11. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist with dental services needed for one of six sampled residents (Resident 196). This failure prevented Resident 196 from obtaining an identified need for dental services.
  12. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to practice infection prevention and control in accordance with their policy for one of six sampled residents (Resident 73) when a foley catheter (a flexible tube that a clinician passes through the bladder) drainage bag was observed touching the floor. This failure had the potential to cause catheter-associated complications including urinary tract infection for Resident 73.
December 6, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an opened bag of carrots in the walk-in refrigerator was dated, labeled, and sealed. This failure had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses for 86 out of 88 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen and were a medically vulnerable resident population.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 11) to address repeated non-compliance with the facility's smoking policy. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 11 placing herself, other residents and staff at risk of injury from a possible fire.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to address one of one sampled resident (Resident 11) repeated non-compliance with the facility's smoking policy. This failure resulted in a risk of fire and had the potential to put residents and staff at risk for harm.

Fire safety inspections

39 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 28, 2026, 5 on November 25, 2025, 17 on March 16, 2023, 13 on December 6, 2019.

Every fire safety citation39 citations
  1. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · July 28, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  2. F
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · July 28, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 28, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  4. D
    Have proper power supply for life support equipment.
    K 915 · July 28, 2026 · Not yet corrected
  5. F
    Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
    K 342 · November 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · November 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · November 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · November 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · November 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. D
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. D
    Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
    K 911 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  21. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  22. C
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  23. C
    Establish policies and procedures for medical documentation.
    E 23 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  24. C
    Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
    E 32 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  25. C
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  26. C
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  27. D
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  28. D
    Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
    E 18 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  29. D
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  30. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  31. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  32. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  33. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  34. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  35. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  36. D
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  37. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  38. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  39. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · December 6, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.654.523.86
Registered nurses0.610.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.434.093.42
Nurse aides2.32
Licensed practical nurses1.72
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)46.5%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover43.8%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.74 on weekdays and 4.43 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.57 in April to June 2025 to 4.65 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.650.614.744.43 2.8%0 of 9094
Oct to Dec 20254.870.544.994.56 4.2%0 of 9291
Jul to Sep 20254.560.484.684.24 0.4%0 of 9293
Apr to Jun 20254.570.544.744.14 3.7%0 of 9196
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Cedar Mountain Post Acute. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.110.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.30.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.01.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.49.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.14.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.412.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
25.022.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.811.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.72.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.31.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cedar Mountain Post Acute's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

47.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

19.1% this home

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CEDAR OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Madison Creek Partners, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Cedar Operations LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%02/13/2015
Christensen, CoveyCorporate officerIndividual02/13/2015
Clegg, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual06/26/2023
Madison Creek Partners LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization02/13/2015
Christensen, CoveyOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/13/2015
Clegg, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/26/2023
Dalton, RobertOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2022
Hage, JeanOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2012
Hopkins, AmberOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2021
Madison Creek Partners LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/28/2025
Christensen, CoveyAdp of the SNFIndividual02/13/2015
Clegg, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual06/26/2023
Dalton, RobertAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2022
Hage, JeanAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2012
Hopkins, AmberAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on April 21, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 25, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 25, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 16, 2023: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in Yucaipa

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its California inspection record.

Assisted living in California

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Cedar Mountain Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Cedar Mountain Post Acute 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Cedar Mountain Post Acute get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 25, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
Has Cedar Mountain Post Acute been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Cedar Mountain Post Acute accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Cedar Mountain Post Acute?
CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Madison Creek Partners. Legal business name: CEDAR OPERATIONS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection