69 95 Queens Midtown Expressway, Maspeth, NY 11378 · Queens County · (718) 429-2200
200 certified beds, about 195 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335472 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 4, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 30 health citations since May 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.97 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
36.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 resident reviewed for Dignity out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Infection Control Preventionist was observed using profane language when speaking to Resident #38.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was provided to the residents, and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior were provided to the residents. This was evident on 1 (Unit 5) of 5 units. Specifically, on Rooms 501, 505, 507, 509, and 517, and the general residents' bathroom were observed with air conditioners with dirty and rusty grill covers, mismatched chipped paint in the residents' room, hole in the wall and unclean discolored bathroom heater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility did not ensure that a Comprehensive Care Plan for each resident was developed and implemented consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #82) of 1 resident reviewed for Hospice and End of Life out of 37 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no care plan created that addressed comfort care for Resident #82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 07/28/2025 to 08/04/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident's Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised. This was evident for 1 resident reviewed for Dignity out of 37 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the Comprehensive Care Plans for Mood State, Cognitive Loss/Dementia, Wandering/Elopement, Behavioral Symptoms (Verbally Abusive Behavior), and Behavioral Symptoms were reviewed and revised for Resident #38 after their last quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was completed.
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: 5Number of residents cited: 1 Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that services provided or arranged by the facility as outlined by the Comprehensive Care Plan meet professional standards of quality including current evidence-based practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #14) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Meds, Chemical Restraints/Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review out of 37 sampled residents. Specifically, Licensed Nurses did not inform the Physician or the Physician Assistant when a resident with diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus had elevated blood glucose readings, of inconsistent blood glucose monitoring as per Physician's order of four times a day and of Resident's refusal of treatment as ordered by the Physician. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with goals for care and professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed for Limited Range of Motion out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #6, who had a history of limited neck flexion, and a Physician's order for cervical brace to be worn at all times except for skin check, hygiene, and exercise was observed on several occasions without them.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the Physician reviewed the resident's total program of care at each visit. This was evident for 1 (Resident #14) of 5 resident reviewed for Unnecessary Meds, Chemical Restraints/Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review out of 37 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence the Physician addressed Resident #14's consistently high blood sugars and non-compliance with diabetic management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00339419 and NY00342391), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, and mistreatment, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities). This was evident in three (3) out of five (5) residents sampled (Residents #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3). Specifically, on 04/11/2024 at 12:50 PM, Registered Nurse #1 documented while monitoring residents at the start of their shift 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM, Resident #1 complained of pain in their private area and stated they think someone might have touched their private area because it hurts. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 7/19/2023 to 7/24/2023, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during Kitchen observation. Specifically, cold sandwiches and milks were not maintained at the proper temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey from 7/19/23 to 7/26/23, the facility did not ensure that a resident was cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity. Specifically, a resident was observed on more than one occasion with no clothes on. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Dignity out of a sample of 35 residents. (Resident # 45)
Inspectors wroteResident #168 Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and complaint survey from 7/19/23 to 7/24/23, the facility did not ensure that each resident has the right to make choices about aspects of life that are significant to the resident. This was evident for one (Resident #168) of six residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #168 was was not asked about bathing preferences when their shower schedule was created, and they were informed about their shower schedule.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interviews during the Recertification and abbreviated survey conducted from 7/19/23 to 7/26/25, the facility did not ensure that residents' privacy and confidentiality were maintained. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Privacy out of a total sample of 35 residents (Resident # 15). Specifically, Resident #15's privacy curtain was missing and left the resident exposed to everybody entering the room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a Recertification survey from 07/19/2023 to 07/26/2023, the facility did not ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. This was evident for 1 (2nd Floor) of 5 Units. Specifically, resident rooms were observed with mismatched paint and dry wall patches, clutter including multiple cardboard boxes and food containers, rusty and cracked light fixtures, ripped fall mats, ripped leather on a resident's recliner, and ripped and dirty privacy curtains.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 7/19/2023 to 7/26/2023, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment was completed within 14 days of admission. This was evident for Resident #157 reviewed for Resident Assessment out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #157's admission MDS was not completed within 14 days of their admission to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 07/19/2023 to 07/26/2023, the facility did not ensure the resident and their representatives were provided with a written summary of the baseline care plan (BCP). This was evident for 2 (Resident #43 and #387) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #43's representative was to provide with a copy of the BCP and, 2) Resident #387 was not provided with a copy of their BCP.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 7/19/2023 to 7/24/2023, the facility did not ensure an effective discharge planning process was developed and implemented. This was evident for 1 (Resident #82) of 3 residents reviewed for Discharge out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, documents needed for discharge planning were not submitted to another facility per Resident #82's request.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 07/19/2023 to 07/26/2023, the facility did not provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident for Resident #95 reviewed for Activities out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #95 was not provided with television (TV) stations in their preferred language.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure a Physician order on oxygen tubing was followed to prevent the transmission of infectious disease. This was evident for 1 (Resident #14) of 2 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care out of a total sample of 35 residents. Specifically, Resident #14's oxygen tubing was not changed in accordance with Physician Order (PO).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews conducted during a recertification survey from 7/19/2024 to 7/24/2024, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for 2 (2nd and 3rd Floor) of 3 medication rooms. Specifically, 1) two boxes of expired flu vaccines were observed in the 3rd Floor medication room, and 2) one box of expired covid vaccines was observed in the 2nd Floor medication room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 7/19/2023 to 7/24/2023, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This was evident during kitchen observation. Specifically, the garbage compactor door was observed ajar, and multiple flies were observed flying on top of garbage inside the compactor.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey the facility did not ensure a surety bond was purchased to provide assurance satisfactory to the Secretary, to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. Specifically, the surety bond held by the facility did not cover the total amount of resident personal funds deposited with the facility. This was evident for 100 of 134 residents who maintained personal funds accounts at the facility. The finding is: On 05/20/2021 the facility submitted a document titled Midway Nursing Home Disbursement Worksheet dated 05/19/2021 which showed a total balance of resident's funds in the amount of $327,083,00. The facility presented a surety bond dated 12/20/2020 to 12/20/2021 in the amount of $140,000. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during a Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. Specifically, 1). a care plan was not created for a resident with a diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus, and 2). A care plan was not implemented for a resident on fluid restrictions. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Nutrition and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care and of out of a sample of 27 residents (Resident #7 and Resident #34).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, 1). Physician's order were not implemented for a resident receiving oral chemotherapy anti-hypertensive medications with special order requirements and monitoring and 2). fluid restriction for a resident with edema was not implemented. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care out of a sample of 27 residents. (Resident # 114 and Resident #34).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure each resident or resident representative was given the opportunity to participate in the review and revision of the care plan. Specifically, a resident was not invited to participate in their care plan meeting. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Care Plan out of a sample of 27 residents. (Resident #71).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure that the facility review the resident's total program of care, including medications, and treatments, at each visit. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of medical follow-up for a resident admitted with a diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). This was evidenced for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Nutrition out of a sample of 27 residents (Resident # 7). The finding is: The facility policy dated March 1, 2021 titled Physician Services documented that it is the policy of Midway Nursing Home to provide Physician Services in accordance with State and Federal Regulations. The policy also documented that the physician will review the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure timely identification and removal from current medication supply of medications for disposition. Specifically, an opened bottle of medication was observed in the medication cart past the expiration date. This was evident on 1 of 5 units reviewed for Medication Storage (Unit 3). The facility policy and procedure titled Expired Medication dated 3/20/2015 documented all medication carts, cabinets and refrigerators will be routinely checked by nursing personnel. All expired medications will be removed and discarded. The procedure included on a weekly basis, 11-7 nurse will check all above-mentioned areas for any expired medications. Same will be discarded. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure medication and biologicals drugs were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, 1). the facility did not ensure the multidose medications were properly labeled with opening date and resident name on the bottle and vial, and 2). insulin pens were not stored in a manner to prevent cross-contamination. This was evident on 1 of 5 units reviewed during the Medication Storage and Labeling Task.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interview conducted during a Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure that special eating equipment and utensils were provided for residents who need them. Specifically, during a lunch meal a resident was not provided with an insulated mug with lid that was ordered. This was observed during the Dining Observation Task for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of a sample of 27 residents (Resident #45). The finding is: The facility policy titled Adaptive Feeding Service Program dated February 2019 documented that it is the policy of Midway Nursing Home that residents will be evaluated as needed and will receive necessary adaptive devices for meals to ensure completion of meals and to enhance their quality of life and to reach their highest level of independence. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated survey, the facility did not maintain clinical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurately documented. Specifically, the physician frequently documented an incorrect gender and age of residents in the clinical records. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of a sample of 27 residents. (Residents #5 and 74).
10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 4, 2025, 6 on July 26, 2023, 1 on May 20, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.97 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.66 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.51 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.5% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 43.5% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.85 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.09 on weekdays and 2.66 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.00 in April to June 2025 to 2.97 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.97 | 0.39 | 3.09 | 2.66 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 195 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.02 | 0.37 | 3.15 | 2.70 | 1.9% | 0 of 92 | 193 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.02 | 0.36 | 3.16 | 2.67 | 6.6% | 0 of 92 | 196 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.00 | 0.34 | 3.10 | 2.76 | 15.2% | 0 of 91 | 195 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.1 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.0 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.7 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.7 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Central Queens Rehab & Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (30.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
30.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
11.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 109 eligible stays.
7.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 67 eligible stays.
66.9% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 139 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 235 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 235 residents counted.
86.5% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MIDWAY NURSING HOME, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalter, Moshe | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 46% | 01/05/2009 |
| Strauss, Jeremy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 9% | 01/01/2023 |
| Kalter, Moshe | Corporate director | Individual | 01/05/2009 | |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2022 | |
| Kalter, Moshe | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/05/2009 | |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2022 | |
| Farkas, Levi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/09/2023 | |
| Rayzberg, Leonid | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Strauss, Jeremy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2022 | |
| Younesi, Peyman | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/03/2019 | |
| Farkas, Levi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2023 | |
| Fogel, Aaron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/05/2009 | |
| Kalter, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/05/2009 | |
| Younesi, Peyman | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/03/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.