100 Rorer Street, Chatham, VA 24531 · Pittsylvania County · (434) 432-0471
85 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495399 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 21, 2024, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since December 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated June 11, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
39.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 6 sampled residents resulting in a transfer to a higher level of care (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 3 medication errors in 34 opportunities for a medication error rate of 8.82%. These medication errors affected Resident #3 and #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease or infections on 1 of 2 resident care units (200 Hall).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 5 closed record reviews, Resident #80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 18 residents in the survey sample, resident # 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents requiring dialysis services receive care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 18 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 15 residents in the survey sample, Residents #13 and #11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide necessary pressure ulcer treatment consistent with medical provider orders to promote healing for 2 of 15 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 and #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents are free of significant medication errors, for 1 of 11 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 15 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on one of two resident care units, Hall 200.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the correct code status for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #39. For Resident #39, the facility staff failed to carry out the resident's and family's decision to change their code status to do not resuscitate (DNR).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 2 of 19 residents, Resident #59 and Resident #68. For Resident #59 the facility staff failed to notify the physician when the resident's blood sugars were outside of the ordered parameters. For Resident #68 the facility staff failed to administer the medication, Keflex as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #39. For Resident #39, the facility staff failed to follow the wound care physician's treatment plan for pressure areas to the left and right buttocks.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained in acceptable parameters to decrease the risk of resident injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide oxygen therapy according to the physician's order and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #53. For Resident #53, the facility staff failed follow the physician's order for oxygen administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to inspect the bed frame, mattress, and the bed rails for the risk of entrapment prior to resident use and failed to assess for the safe use of side rails and risk of entrapment following an incidence of entrapment for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #372. For Resident #372, the facility staff failed to assess the resident for the safe use of side rails and risk of entrapment following an incident where the resident's neck became stuck between the bed and bed rail. Facility staff was unable to provide evidence of a bed safety inspection for Resident #372's bed prior to the incident.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 of 19 residents, Resident #59. For Resident #59 the facility staff failed to ensure the medication Neurontin was available for administration for 5 consecutive doses. Neurontin (gabapentin) is a medication used in the treatment of neuropathy and seizures.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to act upon drug regimen review recommendations for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #53. For Resident #53, the facility staff failed to carry out a physician approved, drug regimen review recommendation for Alprazolam, a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety and panic disorders.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 19 residents, Resident #6, was free of significant medication errors. Resident #6 did not receive their insulin per provider orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation the facility staff failed to properly store and/or label medications. For medication cart A, the facility staff failed to discard expired medication, failed to ensure an insulin pen had a label, failed to ensure medication label contained an expiration date, and failed to place an opened on/use by date on 13 opened insulin pens. For medication cart B, the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure food was prepared and stored under safe and sanitary conditions in the kitchen and 2 of 2 nourishment rooms. A dietary aide was observed working in the kitchen without a hair restraint, the refrigerators in each nourishment room contained unlabeled and undated items, the 400 Hall nourishment room contained outdated juice, and the 400 Hall ice chest contained an insect within the ice.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 19 residents, Resident #59. For Resident #59 the facility staff failed to record the resident's blood sugar and failed to document medications as administered on the medication administration record.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #372. For Resident #372, the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order for contact precautions following a report of bed bugs in the resident's room.
21 fire safety citations on file: 6 on March 21, 2024, 11 on July 27, 2022, 4 on December 5, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 11, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.59 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.18 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.01 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.1% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 36.4% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.18 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.40 in April to June 2025 to 3.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.52 | 3.75 | 3.18 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 81 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.41 | 0.52 | 3.50 | 3.19 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 82 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.47 | 0.47 | 3.52 | 3.35 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.40 | 0.49 | 3.51 | 3.12 | 0.2% | 0 of 91 | 79 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.4 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.7 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.9 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.2 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chatham Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 105 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 106 eligible stays.
8.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
56.6% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 76 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 76 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHATHAM HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Piedmont Healthcare Group Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2009 |
| Wwbv Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/30/2019 |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Isabelle, Chad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/23/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.