Find a nursing home

Home / Mississippi / Clarksdale

Clarksdale Nursing Center

1120 Ritchie Ave, Clarksdale, MS 38614 · Coahoma County · (662) 627-2591

60 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 2001

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255267 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 15, 2024, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 19 health citations since February 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,036 in the last three years; the largest was $10,036, and the latest is dated February 6, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.

37.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).

CMS links it to The Beebe Family, an affiliated group of 48 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
June 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify a dialysis clinic of a significant change in a resident's status for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for notification of change (Resident #1).
August 15, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plans related to fluid restriction (Resident #11), nail care (Resident's #24 & #44) and following Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for (Resident #157) for four (4) of 19 care plans reviewed.
  2. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean and trimmed, as evidenced by long and jagged nails with a brown substance under nails for two (2) of eight (8) residents observed.
  3. E
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put in placing following the recertification survey on 4/6/2023 and the complaint survey on 6/26/2024. This was for deficiency recited during a recertification on 8/15/2024 in the area of F677 Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The continued failure of the facility during three State Surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility to sustain an effective QAA program. This was for one (1) of seven (7) deficient practice citations. Findings Included: This citation is cross-referenced to: [...]
  4. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a fluid restriction was followed for one (1) of five (5) residents on fluid restrictions. Resident #11.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for intravenous antibiotic therapy on two (2) of five (5) care area observations requiring enhanced barrier precautions. (Resident # 157).
  6. C
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) for the use of restraints for five (5) of five (5) resident MDS Assessments reviewed for accurate coding of restraints. Resident #5, #18, #25, #33, and #38.
June 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received incontinent care during a night shift for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of a typed statement by the Administrator dated 06/26/24 on Company Letterhead revealed, Clarksdale Nursing Center does not have a policy specific to how frequent ADL (Activities of Daily Living) rounds are made or incontinent care provided. On 06/26/24 at 7:40 AM, an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) revealed her entering Resident #1's room and confirmed that his brief was soaked with urine and that he should have been changed during the Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) last rounds. [...]
February 6, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an elopement/wandering risk plan of care for Resident #1 who had worn a wander guard since 8/9/23. Resident #1 was one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed who wore a wander guard. Resident #1 was missing from the facility for approximately two (2) and a half (1/2) hours - three (3) and a half (1/2) hours prior to discovery. No facility staff saw the resident leave the facility and no facility staff were aware that Resident #1 was missing until approximately 9:30 PM when they received a call that Resident #1 was at a convenience store. It was also determined that Resident #1 was found at a convenience store approximately eight- tenths of a mile from the facility on a busy four (4) lane highway. [...]
  2. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, family interview, observations, facility security camera video review, record reviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had adequate supervision to prevent an elopement from the facility on 01/30/24 and failed to ensure the wander guard system was properly functioning for one (1) of five (5) residents who were elopement risk and wore wander guards. Resident #1. Resident #1 was missing from the facility for approximately two and a half (2 1/2) hours to three (3) and a half (1/2) hours prior to discovery. No facility staff saw the resident leave the facility and no facility staff were aware that Resident #1 was missing until approximately 9:30 PM when they received a call that Resident #1 was at a convenience store. [...]
April 6, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on resident observation and staff interviews the facility failed to promote dignity related to a catheter bag stored without a privacy bag for one (1) of two (2) residents with urinary catheters. Resident # 13.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to honor a resident's choice for showers for one (1) of 20 residents reviewed.
  3. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to submit a Change in Status referral for a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) related to a new diagnosis of Schizophrenia and after a significant change from a psychiatric in-patient stay for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed. Resident # 31.
  4. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to accurately complete a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and failed to identify a mental disorder resulting in no Level II referral for evaluation for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed. Resident # 31.
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, and record review and the facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for residents requiring diabetic nail care and residents who preferred showers for three (3) of 20 residents reviewed. Resident #16, #30 and #42.
  6. D
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    F675 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide proper position a resident, in her wheelchair, who required feeding assistance for one (1) of 13 residents observed during the lunch dining observation. Resident # 46. Resident #46 Review of the facility policy titled, Feeding the Dependent Resident, with a latest revision date of 10/17, revealed Purpose: To ensure adequate nutrition for residents who are unable to feed themselves. 5. Ensure that resident is seated comfortable in upright position. 17. Position resident comfortably. An observation on 4/4/23 at 11:52 AM, of Resident #46 during lunch dining, in the main dining room revealed her sitting in her wheelchair with her upper body and left elbow extended over the left armrest of the wheelchair while being fed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5. [...]
  7. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean and trimmed as evidenced by long and jagged nails with a brown substance under nails for three (3) of 54 residents observed. Resident #14, Resident #16, and Resident #42
February 4, 2021Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to check placement for a Percutaneous Enteral Gastrostomy (PEG) tube for one (1) of two (2) residents observed during administration of medication through a PEG tube (Resident #51).
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed timely to prevent a potential infection for two (2) of five (5) residents with oxygen, failed to adhere to infection control practices related to donning (putting on) and doffing (removing) proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (Residents #23 and 35), failure to disinfect a medication cart prior to removing from the COVID-19 Unit buffering zone for one (1) of four (4) days of observation and failed to administer eye drops in a manner to prevent infection for one (1) of seven (7) residents observed for medication administration ( Resident #1).

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on April 6, 2023.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. D
    Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
    K 753 · April 6, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
February 6, 2024Fine $10,036

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.714.183.86
Registered nurses0.490.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.113.503.42
Nurse aides2.13
Licensed practical nurses1.10
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)37.5%45.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover37.5%38.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.51 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.96 on weekdays and 3.11 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.72 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.710.493.963.11 0.4%0 of 9055
Oct to Dec 20253.540.443.753.01 0.2%0 of 9257
Jul to Sep 20254.120.544.443.32 1.3%0 of 9253
Apr to Jun 20253.720.604.013.00 5.2%0 of 9155
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Mississippi, Jan to Mar 20264.090.604.353.446.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Mississippi

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Mississippi, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$15.15$14.19 to $16.9214,200
LPNs and LVNs$24.14$22.50 to $27.909,850
Registered nurses$37.06$31.22 to $40.6229,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.320.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.41.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.02.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.03.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.82.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.119.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.26.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.921.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.527.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.115.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.02.41.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.12.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Clarksdale Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

53.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

12.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 56 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

34.8% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

5.3% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CARE GIVERS LLC. CMS links this home to The Beebe Family, a group of 48 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Cnc LTC, LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%08/31/2020
Parkinson, ToniCorporate officerIndividual11/15/2015
Account Management Services IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2010
Administrative Systems IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2010
Cnc LTC, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2011
Legacy Management Services, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/01/2023
Provider Professional Services IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2010
Trinity Rehabilitation IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/31/2006
Beebe, HaroldOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2011
Beebe, TracyOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/02/2022
Estes, TimothyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
Mann, KellyOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2021
Parkinson, ToniOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2010
Shields, SybilOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/08/2023
Account Management Services IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2010
Administrative Systems IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2010
Clarksdale Properties LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Elton G Beebe Family Mortage TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Four Generations Holdings LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Legacy Management Services, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization09/01/2003
Linda MaynorAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2011
Nutrition Systems Consulting IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/31/2008
Pharmaceutical Consulting Services of America LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/28/2018
Provider Professional Services IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2010
Trinity Rehabilitation IncAdp of the SNFOrganization12/31/2006
Beebe, HaroldAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2011
Beebe, TracyAdp of the SNFIndividual12/02/2022
Estes, TimothyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Mann, KellyAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2021
Parkinson, ToniAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2010

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2024: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.11 hours per resident per day, below the Mississippi average of 3.50.

Other nursing homes nearby

Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Clarksdale Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Clarksdale Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Clarksdale Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 15, 2024. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
Has Clarksdale Nursing Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,036 in the last three years.
Does Clarksdale Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Clarksdale Nursing Center?
CMS lists 30 owners and managers, and links the home to The Beebe Family. Legal business name: CARE GIVERS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection