Home / Mississippi / Clarksdale
340 Desoto Ave Extended, Clarksdale, MS 38614 · Coahoma County · (662) 627-3486
60 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255294 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since January 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $15,185 in the last three years; the largest was $10,185, and the latest is dated January 8, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
53.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).
CMS links it to Consulate Health Care/Independence Living Centers/Nspire Healthcare/Raydiant Health Care, an affiliated group of 11 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans to address residents identified Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and skin integrity needs. The facility failed to develop a care plan related to nail care for (Residents #2, #21, and #24); failed to implement the care plan related to grooming and dressing (Resident #21); and failed to develop a care plan related to pressure ulcer prevention (Resident #4) for four (4) of 21 resident care plans reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure the prevention of an avoidable pressure injury for one (1) of seven (7) residents with pressure ulcers, (Resident #4), and delayed treatment for one (1) of seven (7) residents with pressure ulcers. (Resident #58)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 50 residents was treated with dignity when staff allowed the resident to remain in the dining room awaiting the lunch meal without adequate clothing coverage, resulting in exposure of bare skin in a public area. (Resident #31)Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, with a review date of 11/7/2025, revealed, Policy: It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity. On 1/5/2026 at 11:45 AM, Resident #31 was observed sitting in the dining room waiting for lunch to be served. The resident's pants were down underneath her buttocks, and her bare skin was exposed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays for two (2) of 17 residents who attended the Resident Council meeting. (Residents #7 and #8)
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident trust fund withdrawals were safeguarded from misappropriation, when resident funds were withdrawn without documentation verifying goods or services were provided, for two (2) of 40 residents with trust fund accounts. (Residents #5 and #49). Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Resident # 5 An interview with Resident #5 on 1/6/26 at 9:02 AM, she stated that $700.00 was taken out of her trust fund account in May of 2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure required Ombudsman notification was completed and documented when a resident was transferred to the hospital for one (1) of three (3) transfers/discharges reviewed. Resident #55. Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy Transfer and Discharge [including Against Medical Advice (AMA)] revealed 9. Non-Emergency Transfers or Discharges .d. The facility will provide transfer/discharge notice to the resident/representative and Ombudsman as indicated. Record review of a Progress Note for Resident #55 revealed that he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/7/26 at 1:00 PM she stated that there was no documentation of Ombudsman notification of the resident's transfer on 11/25/25 because it was not sent. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance received grooming and personal hygiene, including nail care (Resident #2, 21 and 24) and cleanliness of clothing (Resident #21) for three (3) of 50 residents observed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), with a review date of 11/7/2025, revealed, .Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. Resident #2 During initial rounds on 1/5/2026 at 11:05 AM, Resident #2 was observed lying in bed wearing a hospital gown with approximately one-half of an inch (1/2) in length nails with jagged edges and a thick, brown substance underneath. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident responsible party interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary care and treatment to maintain the highest practicable level of well-being by failing to obtain physician orders for wound dressings identified upon admission (Resident #16) for one (1) of 21 residents reviewed for skin and wound concerns. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Provision of Quality Care with no revision date revealed, Each resident will be provided care and services to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident # 16 Observation on 01/05/26 at 11:45 AM revealed the Resident #16 had an undated dressing located on the left upper arm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to accurately monitor and document fluid intake for one (1) of seven (7) residents on fluid restrictions. Resident #7. Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy titled Fluid Restriction date reviewed 11/5/25 revealed It is the policy of this facility to ensure that fluid restrictions will be followed in accordance to physician's orders . Record review of the Order Summary Report for Resident # 7 revealed an active order, dated 7/11/2025 for fluid restriction 1000 cubic centimeters (CC). Total nursing 300cc nursing days, 120cc evening, 90cc night. Total dietary 700cc breakfast, 340cc lunch, 120cc supper -240cc. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure newly prescribed medications were accurately transcribed onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure resulted in the resident's antipsychotic medication being abruptly discontinued for 12 consecutive days. (Resident #21)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices to prevent the transmission of infections. The facility failed to ensure that staff used Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during medication administration and failed to ensure oxygen delivery devices and wash basins were stored in a sanitary manner when not in use during three (3) of nine (9) resident care opportunities. (Residents #5, #9 and #21) Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration with a review date of 11/7/2025, revealed, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines. Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) with a review date of 11/13/2025, revealed, Policy: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to put safety measures in place to prevent an accident during van transport for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of Instructions for loading and unloading a resident with a wheelchair lift on a transport vehicle, provided by the Administrator, revealed Securing the resident in the vehicle. Secure vehicle supplied safety seat belt around the resident. Interview with the Staff Development Nurse on 5/21/25 at 12:15 PM, she verified that the facility did not have a policy on accident prevention or van transport. Record review of the facility investigation revealed on 5/2/25, during transportation to a physician's appointment Resident #1 fell from the wheelchair on to the van floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for seven (7) of 30 residents reviewed. Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, titled Administering Medications with a revision date of 04/2019 revealed Policy Statement, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed . Record review of a facility investigation revealed that on 2/20/25 Registered Nurse (RN) #1 notified the Director of Nursing (DON) that she had not given medication to seven (7) of the residents she was assigned to for the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift. The DON conducted an audit and verified that seven (7) out of 30 residents RN #1 was assigned to for the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift had not received their scheduled medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed the required training for the Infection Preventionist role for three (3) of three (3) survey days observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy during a bed bath for one (1) of 17 residents sampled. Resident #33 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Privacy with an effective date of 11/30/14 and no revision date revealed, Policy .It is the policy of The Company to give all residents the opportunity for privacy .Procedure: #2 Residents privacy will always be respected. An observation on 06/03/24 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #33 lying in bed uncovered with only a brief on and the privacy curtain was not pulled between her and Unsampled Resident #40 (roommate). Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #2 was at the resident's bedside and did not announce patient care when the State Agent (SA) knocked on the resident's room door for entry. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a resident with a wheelchair in good repair as evidenced by torn and tattered arm rest and a broken wheelchair brake for one (1) of 17 sampled residents. Resident #16 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Maintenance with an effective date of 11/30/2014 revealed, Policy: The facility's physical plant and equipment will be maintained through a program of preventative maintenance and prompt action to identify areas/items in need of repair .Procedure: All employees will report physical plant areas or equipment in need of repair or service to their supervisor . An observation and interview with Resident #16 on 6/3/2024 at 10:39 AM, revealed him sitting in a wheelchair in his room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice for salt with meals for one (1) of twenty-four residents included in the initial pool. Resident #45 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights with an effective date of 11/30/2014 revealed, Policy: The facility will ensure that the resident is not deprived of his/her rights An observation and interview with Resident #45 on 6/3/2024 at 10:46 AM, revealed him lying in bed. The resident voiced that he had asked staff several times for salt with his meals, but they would not allow it because he had high blood pressure. He revealed he could not eat the food without some salt for flavor. Record review of Resident #45's Order Summary revealed an order, NAS (No Added Salt) diet . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Advanced Directive for code status preference was discussed and completed by the resident's representative for one (1) of 24 residents in initial pool.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan regarding turning and repositioning for a resident that was dependent on staff for one (1) of seventeen care plans reviewed. Resident #18 Findings Include Cross Reference F684 Record review of the facility policy titled, Plans of Care with a revision date of 09/25/17 revealed, Procedure .Develop a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was clean and dry for one (1) of seventeen sampled residents. Resident #45 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living revealed under, Policy: To encourage resident choice and participation in activities of daily living (ADL) and provide oversight, cuing and assistance as necessary. ADLs include bathing, dressing, grooming, hygiene, toileting and eating. An observation on 6/4/2024 at 12:31 PM, revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #5 entered Resident #45's room and delivered a lunch tray, then exited the room. An observation and interview with Resident #45 on 6/4/2024 at 12:32 PM, revealed him lying in bed with his lunch tray sitting on top of the overbed table covered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to turn or reposition a resident that was dependent on staff for one (1) of eight (8) residents reviewed that were dependent on staff. Resident #18 Findings Include: Cross Reference to F726 and F656 Record review of the facility policy titled, Contractures, Prevention with a revision date of 8/22/17 revealed Positioning .Residents who are unable to move themselves should be repositioned frequently, at least every two hours, when in bed or when sitting in the chair. On 06/04/24 at 08:15 AM, observation revealed Resident #18 was lying in bed with the head of bed (HOB) at 90 degrees while a staff member was feeding the resident breakfast. On 6/4/24 at 9:00 AM, 10:30 AM, 11:15 AM and 12:30 PM, observations revealed Resident #18 in the same position, lying in bed with the HOB at 90 degrees. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed an orientation competency check off prior to caring for residents for one (1) of six (6) staff personnel files reviewed. CNA #1 Findings Include: Cross Reference F684 Record review of the facilities policy titled, New Hire Orientation with a revision date of 8/17/21 revealed under Policy .It is the policy of the Company to orient each new employee upon hire by providing the employee with general and job specific information regarding the mission and values of the Company, policies and procedures, job duties, benefits and safety regulations. Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1's personnel record revealed there was no skills competency check off completed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for three (3) of 22 residents care plans reviewed. Resident's #7, #22, and #32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to promote healing of pressures ulcers and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) of five (5)residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, Resident #22. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Skin and Wound with a revision date of 01/24/22 revealed under Policy .To promote a system for identifying risk, and implementing resident centered interventions to promote skin health, prevention and healing of pressure injuries. This review revealed under Process: Pressure Injury Prevention .#3 Nurse to complete skin evaluation weekly and prior to transfer/discharge and document in the medical record and under Skin Impairment Identification #1. Document presence of skin impairment(s)/new skin impairment(s), when observed and weekly until resolved. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that there were sufficient nursing staff in the facility to provide adequate care and assistance for residents for three (3) of four (4) days of survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide showers, shaving and nail care for six (6) of 54 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Resident # 7, Resident # 13, Resident #32, Resident # 37, Resident # 156, Resident # 157
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to follow the approved resident menu for one (1) of nine (9) meals observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan for a resident admitted to the nursing facility with a Stage II Sacrum/Coccyx Wound and failed to update the Baseline Care Plan for a resident with a new order for positioning related to the care of a Left Lower Leg Wound. Resident #156 and Resident #157.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews and record review, the facility failed to position a resident as ordered by the physician for one (1) of four (4) residents with positioning devices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent a resident from obtaining a urinary catheter without a physician's order for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 8, 2026 | Fine | $5,000 |
| January 8, 2026 | Fine | $10,185 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.58 | 4.18 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.10 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.12 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.6% | 45.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 38.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.15 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.78 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 1.12 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.37 | 3.78 | 3.08 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 55 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.42 | 0.41 | 3.57 | 3.01 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 55 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.46 | 0.40 | 3.66 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 1.12 | 0.11 | 1.17 | 1.02 | 0.0% | 61 of 91 | 56 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Mississippi, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.60 | 4.35 | 3.44 | 6.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $15.15 | $14.19 to $16.92 | 14,200 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $24.14 | $22.50 to $27.90 | 9,850 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $31.22 to $40.62 | 29,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.8 | 20.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 19.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.9 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Greenbough Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 22 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
70.3% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
3.1% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 340 DESOTO AVENUE EXT OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Consulate Health Care/Independence Living Centers/Nspire Healthcare/Raydiant Health Care, a group of 11 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fglfc Holdco, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Fc Investors Xxi LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Lavie Holdco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Lv Investment LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Nspr Care Centers, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Nspr Operations I, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Nspr Operations II, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Thomas, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Buckner, Irene | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Conrad, Kathy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/12/2026 | |
| Thomas, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Winkle, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/10/2024 | |
| SNF Mgr LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/07/2026 | |
| Buckner, Irene | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Conrad, Kathy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/12/2026 | |
| Hoback, Tiffany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Thomas, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Winkle, Ashley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.